|
#581
●
10-07-2015, 09:30 AM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:5607 Male Join Date: Oct 2015 Posts: 44 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 11 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Reporter, Cameraman Shot Dead on Live TV in Virginia
No way, it's been all over the damn news! However...don't get me wrong, I do NOT believe everything I see on the news. But this is one is reality. |
|
#584
●
10-07-2015, 11:30 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:8523 Join Date: May 2013 Posts: 20 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 2 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Reporter, Cameraman Shot Dead on Live TV in Virginia
Thanks Kel007....hope its real. Good Ol Enquirer.
 · |
|
#588
●
10-10-2015, 12:34 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:17573 Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 4 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 2 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Reporter, Cameraman Shot Dead on Live TV in Virginia
There is actually a video on youtube diagramming the two videos, I can't remember the name of the vid, but if you watch both POV and Cameramans POV, the reporter made a gesture on POV where in the cameramans point of view she did not. At slowmo, there is a delayed reaction, if you also look at the gun and the aim which he would be firing, that lady would not have time to run let alone scream after being shot either in the heart or the lungs. Where is the blood splatter? The time that elapsed between the two videos are also been reported significantly different, so intitally there were two takes. It is fake guys, do some research. |
|
#590
●
10-10-2015, 08:28 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:8521 Join Date: Apr 2013 Posts: 20 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 6 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Reporter, Cameraman Shot Dead on Live TV in Virginia
Zaredth, Honest question, maybe the guy I asked before thought I was just trying to be a dick. A guy can point out all sorts of things to me but If he can't explain these things to me: three dead bodies, coroners & families making IDs and burying their loved ones (including the shitty ones), one live patient treated for real wounds and seen by who knows how many people then that sort of blows the whole theory then doesn't it? These things are dispositive. In other words, all else is simply irrelevant until these things can be explained. If all of these things are somehow faked or are part of the conspiracy then there's a whole list of things after that including hundreds of people that all have to be in on it with zero uniting motive to explain their involvement. Occam's razor, my friend. Back to the questions I'm honestly interested in hearing explained: Who killed Parker, Ward and Flanagan and who shot Vicki Gardner in the back? |
