[Heavy]

Tried to leave a third world country only to have it sneak in with ya

[Deastergard]

Originally Posted by Kurlis ↗

Vehicle control is coming. Authoritarian progressives feel strongly they must regulate our lives. Because they claim to know what's best for us better than we do.

They’ve already started that too my friend. V8 vehicles are pretty much discontinued. Most cars aren’t as punchy as they used to be. They’re getting slower, less powerful, and more computers are being implemented in the build. Somebody, somewhere can shut down most any car made after 2010. Pretty convenient for somehow who wanted to control movement in mass. I don’t think most people realize how badly they’re being encroached on. Or they just plug their ears and close their eyes and pretend it isn’t happening.

[vulturedoors]

Originally Posted by sirjokalot ↗

lol Don't argue against low IQ racists/low intellect fools on this site. You wont get through to them.

It's not them I'm speaking to.

I think there's always value in presenting a rational argument for the benefit of the silent lurkers, both online and in real life. And to make sure everyone knows that there are people around them who do not agree with whatever happens to be the loudest bullshit in the vicinity.

[vulturedoors]

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

I'm sorry to be put in a position to disappoint you and deflate your most ardent hopes—but the man (assuming he actually existed) has been dead for circa 2,000 years; insofar as his being the protagonist mythological figure within the Christian death-cult, he is, of course, entirely factitious and imaginary—the ersatz creation of the diseased minds of schizophrenics and temporal lobe epileptics who wrote all those phantasmagorical stories in the Bible.

He, himself, was a paranoid schizophrenic afflicted with delusions of grandeur and suffering from a fixation with suicide by proxy, antisocial personality disorder, Geschwind syndrome, hyperreligiosity and religious paranoia—among other comorbidities.

Let the man rest in peace; Invoking his memory, when real people are dying now, and there isn't one smidgen he can do about it to make a difference (since he is imaginary)—is truly obscene and reprehensible.

Put the tired, dusty demigod out to good pasture, Monsieur.

It's about time.

Go back to bed, bro. You're drunk twelve.

[Vash_227]

[Killgaad]

Originally Posted by vulturedoors ↗

Go back to bed, bro. You're drunk twelve.

I am certainly NOT twelve—but you evidently write like a six-year-old.

Besides, I can't go to bed, BRO, because you keep snoring.

When you are able to make a single cogent point, then try defending your Hebrew master in a professional debate—against an interlocutor who actually possesses the capacity to reason.

And don't give me "Because the Bible says so!" That means diddly-squat, BRO.

To castigate you properly, I shall now chastise you with Hitchens's razor:

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."

I am not your bro, BRO.

Now skirt-skirt.

P.S. Since you seem to be female, I wouldn't normally be an asshole to you, but if there's anything that truly annoys me, is people who do not write in a literary fashion, and who do not have enough self-respect to support their argument with evidence and proper reasoning—choosing to instead resort to Ad Hominem attacks—which are never acceptable—especially if they're deployed when discussing a trenchant cogitation on such a salient subject.

Ta-ta.

[SamuraiDes]

Is this in Mexico why none speaks English

[rick7022]

I live close to Brownsville. Poor victims.

[vulturedoors]

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

I am certainly NOT twelve—but you evidently write like a six-year-old.

Besides, I can't go to bed, BRO, because you keep snoring.

When you are able to make a single cogent point, then try defending your Hebrew master in a professional debate—against an interlocutor who actually possesses the capacity to reason.

And don't give me "Because the Bible says so!" That means diddly-squat, BRO.

To castigate you properly, I shall now chastise you with Hitchens's razor:

"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."

I am not your bro, BRO.

Now skirt-skirt.

P.S. Since you seem to be female, I wouldn't normally be an asshole to you, but if there's anything that truly annoys me, is people who do not write in a literary fashion, and who do not have enough self-respect to support their argument with evidence and proper reasoning—choosing to instead resort to Ad Hominem attacks—which are never acceptable—especially if they're deployed when discussing a trenchant cogitation on such a salient subject.

Ta-ta.

U mad bro?