|
#44
●
08-26-2011, 03:04 PM
|
|
Re: Arsonist Sets Himself On Fire Trying To Bomb A Bank
It was at 2 in the morning so no one should have been in there and as shown in the clip it was not exactly a bomb of provo preportions. I am a advocate of direct action and considering all the suffering people face everyday (alot seen on this site) and the damage the financial industry has done to the world I have no problem with a bank being attacked. It is clear that the intention was not to kill or maim but make a statement through property damage (propaganda by deed). Yes I feel sorry for him and wish him a speedy recouparation. HOWEVER I do think that this type of action should be frowned apon. What info was there to say the building was empty? It probably had a security guard (low paid working man/woman). What if people had been walking past when it went off? I does not bare thinking about. |
|
#45
●
08-26-2011, 03:28 PM
|
|
Re: Arsonist Sets Himself On Fire Trying To Bomb A Bank
HOWEVER I do think that this type of action should be frowned apon. What info was there to say the building was empty? It probably had a security guard (low paid working man/woman). What if people had been walking past when it went off? I does not bare thinking about. That's my point DO NOT feel sorry for a guy that would have hurt you or me to make a point, what if you're kid walked passed that when it went off?, if it blew his hands off it was a bomb plain and simple, I have no good will towards him, and besides we do not know what his intentions really were, fuck him let him live in misery because I am sure his intended victims would have. |
|
#46
●
08-26-2011, 05:35 PM
|
|
Re: Arsonist Sets Himself On Fire Trying To Bomb A Bank
Man, that's rough. I remember when this came out a while back and I read somewhere that he COULDN'T drop the backpack because it had exploded and fused with his skin. That makes it really, really horrific if it's true.
|