|
#133
●
11-20-2016, 12:28 AM
|
|
Re: 2 Women Butchering a Tied Up Man
He might have deserved it, it's not as though any of us know really what the guy did. What we do know is two empty evil fucks butchered a man in the street and laughed about the horror before them. I can understand wanting to do this if he say, raped and killed my daughter, but I wouldn't be laughing about it in the process. Also, wanting to do something and doing something are different things. This man was going to get his moment of truth one way or another. Life is cheap to some people. Ironically, they'll likely pay the most. |
|
#134
●
11-22-2016, 05:11 AM
|
|
Re: 2 Women Butchering a Tied Up Man
There is 0 evidence to support the claim the victim was a rapist/murderer/whatever you think deserves to be butchered like that. I know you guys like to push a certain narrative where only people who committed the worst of crimes are killed in manners such as those, but I can assure you if you ran afoul with those women, they'll have no qualms killing you the same way. Those women are simply sick in the head, no mentally sane individual would laugh while killing someone like that. That is undisputed, hell with those stoic cartel types killing is like filing paperwork, you see no emotion from them. It's a 9-5 thing I would wager, but in this case they were enjoying every single moment in it. Don't buy the rapist angle. At all. |
|
#140
●
11-26-2016, 08:23 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT Poster Rank:697 Male Join Date: Jun 2010 Posts: 1,219 Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Quoted: 257 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: 2 Women Butchering a Tied Up Man
Rapist or not, you don't do things like this to another human being(or any animal). 1. It won't deter others. 2. It actually sends a message that it's OK to do shit like this to people in the first place...so why shouldn't I go do what I want to someone because I really really feel it's a good idea? They sneezed without covering their mouth, they deserve to be raped after all. 3. In the classic Nature or Nurture debate, nobody ever seems to argue for "neither" because everything we do is implicitly understood to be based on antecedent causes. Pepople will object to this, but when asked why they did something, they’re stuck in a corner. They can say it was random, but that’s not free will. Alternatively, they can say, "I did it because…" and fill in the blank. That’s fine, but whatever reason they give will be an example of causality, by definition. That’s the meaning of the word "because." It doesn’t even matter what they put at the end of the phrase – it’s still a cause. Saying "I did it just because I wanted to," or "I did it just because I chose to," doesn’t help. It only pushes the question back a step, without answering it. Why did they want to? Why did they choose to? Again, they can either claim it was random, or they can give a cause. But neither option offers the free will needed to condemn the guy in this video, or the people doing it. What matters is that we try to correct the problem and revenge doesn't help that. Understanding the problem to be solved does. |