|
#12
●
05-05-2011, 03:25 AM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: SERGEANT MAJOR Poster Rank:275 Male Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 4,688 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 18 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Infant Victims of the Afghan War *Child Warning*
Eh, I made the same mistake my first week here, turns out I was completely wrong, snowbun will put ya in place about each and EVERY defect and its cause.
|
|
#15
●
05-06-2011, 06:08 PM
| ||||||||
 Narcissist Psycho ****** Poster Rank:7 Supreme Queer Overlord Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 101,166
Contributions: 2
Mentioned: 199 Post(s) Quoted: 50371 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Infant Victims of the Afghan War *Child Warning*
None of those deformities are results from radiation. Also, uranium is not used in any of our weapons over there. Not even depleted uranium is used. Anti-US propaganda. All false. |
|
#20
●
06-25-2011, 02:15 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:8054 female. Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 22 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 3 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Infant Victims of the Afghan War *Child Warning*
Yeah..this doctor is an idiot. Ive seen most of these exact pix before, and none of them had to do with radiation. Birth defects, yeah, particularly Harlequin's disease, and some chromosomal defect that I cant remember.
|
