[BadAshly]

Which means children, that since it's not "through the skin" the veins would be red, and therefor are likely coloured to produce effect. The wound may be real.

[BadmouthBetty]

Originally Posted by rheedork ↗

I call bullshit. Veins are never blue, that's just common knowledge.

Omg, seriously?

common knowledge he/she says....

[Desensitisation]

It's either real, which I believe, or an extremely well done photoshop which looks perfectly real to me.

[HairyGrape]

Originally Posted by BadmouthBetty ↗

Omg, seriously?

common knowledge he/she says....

Betty!!!!! <3

[Trocar7]

That be real

[Akkeri]

real. it's a cut from an extremely sharp obsidian blade

[rheedork]

Originally Posted by BadAshly ↗

Google is also common knowledge:

"Blood is always red, veins appear blue due to light wavelengths being filtered differently by the skin. Blood is always red, actually. Veins look blue because light has to penetrate the skin to illuminate them, blue and red light (being of different wavelengths) penetrate with different degrees of success." Oct 16, 2012

Blood and veins are both red, veins appear blue ONLY when viewed THROUGH the skin.

Geniuses everywhere these days

And? Veins are blue when viewed through the skin, but does it make them blue altogether? No. That's my point, so I don't get your problem.

[BadmouthBetty]

Originally Posted by HairyGrape ↗

Betty!!!!! <3

Hello there my n. cage loving grape with hair! How you been lovely?

[chuck Dean]

Yes blood is red, it doesn't mean veins are transparent. It looks real, the prints match.

[neilwatt]

It's not fake