|
#1
●
06-12-2025, 08:34 PM
|
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2540 Join Date: Dec 2022 Posts: 171 171Posts 715Thanked 91Quoted 0Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Amputation of the Lower Leg (1903)
I don't even know how to comment on this. Maybe just how lucky I am to live in this time and that infection control exists. |
|
#2
●
06-12-2025, 09:13 PM
|
 ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:254 Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 5,528
Contributions: 18
5,528Posts 7,003Thanked 1,200Quoted 3Mentioned 18Contrib. |
|
Re: Amputation of the Lower Leg (1903)
No gloves, no masks and no antibiotics.
|
|
#5
●
06-13-2025, 12:24 AM
|
 ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:120 Happy Happy Happy Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 13,433 13,433Posts 25,811Thanked 4,382Quoted 26Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Re: Amputation of the Lower Leg (1903)
In case YouTube decides this is "inappropriate" some day
|
|
#6
●
06-13-2025, 12:31 AM
|
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:108 Secret Agent Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 15,050 15,050Posts 49,978Thanked 3,088Quoted 6Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Re: Amputation of the Lower Leg (1903)
Amazing post. Scary shit. Nice when he poked his finger in between the two bones.  |
|
#8
●
06-13-2025, 03:49 AM
|
 ✝Mudderator from Hell✝ Poster Rank:10 e-mail Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 96,934
Contributions: 904
96,934Posts 545,271Thanked 10,399Quoted 481Mentioned 904Contrib. |
|
Re: Amputation of the Lower Leg (1903)
Up to 80% of surgical patients died due to infection, blood loss, or complications in the early 1900's.  |
