[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by bigbob2010 ↗

I don't know about the first one, but I have seen the full set on the second one, and I assure you, she's dead as a door nail.

So put your money where your mouth is and post the set. I'm sure that would clear up any confusion.

[bigbob2010]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

So put your money where your mouth is and post the set. I'm sure that would clear up any confusion.

OK, will do;
These are from a while back, so I apologize if they're re-posts.

[bigbob2010]

Oops, forgot one:

[Vedderman]

Well, you put up, at least, so I give you credit for that.

Here's my problem with the authenticity of the photos. Look at the background. Leaves. Curb. Pavement. Shopping bags. Random detritus. That's someone's back yard. Or front yard. But yard regardless.

In the autopsy photo, a single vertical incision has obviously just been made (this is an uncommon incision in western forensic pathology, but not unheard of so it could be legit), but she's sitting on a rusted-ass gurney out in the middle of the yard?

I can't say conclusively that these images are real or fake. It is certainly possible to doctor a photo to look opened up, but I can't spot any obvious triggers.

Except for the aforementioned. I don't care what country you're in or how underpaid your hillbilly ME might be, nowhere in the world do they just conduct full autopsies on women out in the middle of the yard. It defies all reason and all sense. Even if she were nude when they wheeled her in from the scene of death, they sure as hell wouldn't start making autopsy incisions out in the great wide open. Where are they supposed to put the organs once removed? In that bucket-style ashtray full of sand over in the corner?

[Kelseecat65]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

I can't tell you what chinese fetish site produced them, but I can tell you with almost 100% certainty that they are fake as fuck. If somoene wants to prove me wrong, please do. But I really don't think the chick in this photo is dead.

post #644 is a perfect example!

[Kelseecat65]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

Well, you put up, at least, so I give you credit for that.

Here's my problem with the authenticity of the photos. Look at the background. Leaves. Curb. Pavement. Shopping bags. Random detritus. That's someone's back yard. Or front yard. But yard regardless.

In the autopsy photo, a single vertical incision has obviously just been made (this is an uncommon incision, but not unheard of so it could be legit), but she's sitting on a rusted-ass gurney out in the middle of the yard?

I can't say conclusively that these images are real or fake. It is certainly possible to doctor a photo to look opened up, but I can't spot any obvious triggers.

Except for the aforementioned. I don't care what country you're in or how underpaid your hillbilly ME might be, nowhere in the world do they just conduct full autopsies on women out in the middle of the yard. It defies all reason and all sense. Even if she were nude when they wheeled her in from the scene of death, they sure as hell wouldn't start making autopsy incisions out in the great wide open. Where are they supposed to put the organs once removed? In that bucket-style ashtray full of sand over in the corner?

The setting with the leaves, etc almost makes it look like a backyard Halloween display!

[cadaverlover]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

Well, you put up, at least, so I give you credit for that.

Here's my problem with the authenticity of the photos. Look at the background. Leaves. Curb. Pavement. Shopping bags. Random detritus. That's someone's back yard. Or front yard. But yard regardless.

In the autopsy photo, a single vertical incision has obviously just been made (this is an uncommon incision in western forensic pathology, but not unheard of so it could be legit), but she's sitting on a rusted-ass gurney out in the middle of the yard?

I can't say conclusively that these images are real or fake. It is certainly possible to doctor a photo to look opened up, but I can't spot any obvious triggers.

Except for the aforementioned. I don't care what country you're in or how underpaid your hillbilly ME might be, nowhere in the world do they just conduct full autopsies on women out in the middle of the yard. It defies all reason and all sense. Even if she were nude when they wheeled her in from the scene of death, they sure as hell wouldn't start making autopsy incisions out in the great wide open. Where are they supposed to put the organs once removed? In that bucket-style ashtray full of sand over in the corner?

Lol @ "hillbilly ME" but I think you hit it right on the mark...you see although China is the 2nd largest economy in the world doesn't mean all of their morgues get the biggest of budgets...this is most likely a "hillbilly" morgue located in a very rural village...hence the shitty environment and poor ME skills (no Y-incision)...In major cities in China like Shanghai and Hong Kong you will see the fancy morgues (if you will) and you will not see these type of primitive practices...

[coco-noptik]

possible sexual attack victim

[meh_]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

Well, you put up, at least, so I give you credit for that.

Here's my problem with the authenticity of the photos. Look at the background. Leaves. Curb. Pavement. Shopping bags. Random detritus. That's someone's back yard. Or front yard. But yard regardless.

In the autopsy photo, a single vertical incision has obviously just been made (this is an uncommon incision in western forensic pathology, but not unheard of so it could be legit), but she's sitting on a rusted-ass gurney out in the middle of the yard?

I can't say conclusively that these images are real or fake. It is certainly possible to doctor a photo to look opened up, but I can't spot any obvious triggers.

Except for the aforementioned. I don't care what country you're in or how underpaid your hillbilly ME might be, nowhere in the world do they just conduct full autopsies on women out in the middle of the yard. It defies all reason and all sense. Even if she were nude when they wheeled her in from the scene of death, they sure as hell wouldn't start making autopsy incisions out in the great wide open. Where are they supposed to put the organs once removed? In that bucket-style ashtray full of sand over in the corner?

I've looked over these set a millions times, it really doesn't make any sense but I can't find any flaws or signs of photo manip.

If you take a look at the up close face photo, try getting your eyes to close that tight and have them not flutter like crazy then have one almost shut tight while looking upward, I tried and couldn't do it. Her eyes seem to be like that through the entire series. If it is a fake it's a very good one, good details from the twisted and stiff looking right ankle to the top lip in the one where she's cut open.

[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by meh_ ↗

I've looked over these set a millions times, it really doesn't make any sense but I can't find any flaws or signs of photo manip.

If you take a look at the up close face photo, try getting your eyes to close that tight and have them not flutter like crazy then have one almost shut tight while looking upward, I tried and couldn't do it. Her eyes seem to be like that through the entire series. If it is a fake it's a very good one, good details from the twisted and stiff looking right ankle to the top lip in the one where she's cut open.

I know. I couldn't find the hallmarks of photoshopping on that set either (unlike many of the 'naked chinese girl' sets where it is plainly obvious), but I still don't buy the 'outdoor autopsy' scenario.

Even backwoods, impoverished villages in China wouldn't be doing a goddam autopsy in the middle of a parking lot or back yard and then digitally photographing in high resolution just to post on goresites.

There's a reason that China has billions of people but we see VERY few detailed images from there on sites like this. Because the shit is regulated and hard to find. I've got contacts in China. Several of them. And they bust ass to find me good material to post here. Yet years later, all I tend to get is heavily-censored news footage and 30 year old execution stills.

Yet somehow some backwoods coroner who can't even afford rust-cleaner for his gurney or curbside trash pickup is taking dozens of hi-res photos and posting them online just for kicks?

The details on the body itself look legit. But the entire scenario is so implausible and ridiculous to any experienced 'gore searcher' that it invites incredulity and begs criticism. I'd like to see some provenance on these images, at least.