[Laurisa]

Great job!!!

[Spiffyfable]

Hope he wasn't done in for some porn and looking creepy.

If he was a baby molester... then I got NO Sympathy

[Cancun78]

Originally Posted by Ugly ↗

those pics don't look like children to me, they look older then i am, plus he's got a magazine there.. would a magazine post pics of nude children? maybe he like 20 year olds and someone thought that not right him bieng 60 and them being 20, yea its a 40 year age difference but they aint chillun's

That was my first thought!!!!!!!!!!!


Then i remember the man that molested me had porn images of adult women all over the walls of his home. That was a long time ago. Never thought about that really. But i know he stuck his fingers up inside me in the barn across from my home and then later that day asked me if i wanted to have sex (using dirty hand motion).

Maybe a crime of opportunity? I know some guys who claim they "cant jack off". Something to talk about.

[K53]

Next Door Neighbor from Hell

[chewbacca]

This should be the end of all pedos. 90% of them can't be reformed and there are plenty predators who are opportunists. They will commit crimes against children if and when the opportunity arises. I like a one strike law on pedos. U screw up, your choice, life in prison or castration whichever you prefer.

[Drowningturnsmeon]

People being falsely accused of being pedophiles happens constantly, it's bound to when people get dangerously wound-up at the mere suggestion and fail to use logic.
Such as recently in Australia when some stupid mother posted a picture on Facebook of a man she thought was taking pictures of her children, when in reality he was taking a selfie with a statue. So for the next week or so he was constantly getting death threats and maybe if he didn't have police protection some violent idiot might have killed him without any more proof than the others accusation (which she later did retract, but too late).

And that's the key problem here, what did the neighbors base this off?
Cold hard proof or just mere suggestion? Some rumor?
I think you're worse than being a pedo if you think it's okay to go around brutally murdering people at the mere suggestion of someone being something.
Let's not forget this kind of shit has happened throughout history to other minorities, which most of us look back on now has horrible yet at the time was considered a good thing by many.
This is why vigilantly justice is never okay.
The real justice system gets it wrong sometimes even with due-process, random civilians have a dramatically increased rate of getting it wrong.

Of course I understand on a website dedicated to fetisihing death and gore that the idea that brutal murder being bad would be controversial.
But if the only proof you have to go off is another random persons word and you think that's enough to kill a guy over? You're messed up.