[Vedderman]

Fucking watermarks. Always this same guy, too, who watermarks his pics so badly they're rarely worth the bother. I'm only putting them up here because mother-daughter double executions are fairly rare and because it is my hope that someone with more time or sources than myself can find clean images.

Unlikely, though. This photographer has been pretty much the premiere rojas journalist in Guerrero for over a decade now (as long as I have been collecting Mexi-gore anyway) and he always gets the best quality shots, with the most access while other scrub-ass shutterbugs are shooting with cell phones from 50 yards away. I have found more than 20 articles on this murder, but every single one of them except these were taken from outside the room and didnt even show the bodies.

But those fucking watermarks. Ah well.
Better than nothing.

Mom was 38 and is the frizzy-haired face-down corpse.

Daughter was 17 and is the head-shot corpse lying on her back with a random bra tangled up around her leg. Great fucking housekeepers, this pair. Clearly not moonlighting as maids.

[txtrucker79]

That's overkill in watermarks

[SimoneFlen']

Same bloody prick who ruined the photos I put on a thread. The photos were really crisp + clear but got ruined by the obnoxious watermarks: https://www.documentingreality.com/f...kplace-186028/

[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by Dahlia_Neda ↗

Same bloody prick who ruined the photos I put on a thread. The photos were really crisp + clear but got ruined by the obnoxious watermarks: https://www.documentingreality.com/f...kplace-186028/

Problem is, he's the photographer and head honcho at the site. It means the photos (which are ALWAYS better than any other photos from Guerrero) are actually his property. He watermarks them to protect that fact. I can't really fault him for protecting his work.

I just wish he'd actually respond to the multiple offers of money I have made to him in order to license unwatermarked (or smaller watermarks anyway) copies.

But he takes the photos and he publishes the photos, so it really is his legal and ethical right to handle them as he sees fit.

[FrankRagsdale]

Looks like she watermarked her shorts.

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

Problem is, he's the photographer and head honcho at the site. It means the photos (which are ALWAYS better than any other photos from Guerrero) are actually his property. He watermarks them to protect that fact. I can't really fault him for protecting his work.

I just wish he'd actually respond to the multiple offers of money I have made to him in order to license unwatermarked (or smaller watermarks anyway) copies.

But he takes the photos and he publishes the photos, so it really is his legal and ethical right to handle them as he sees fit.

Ah ok, I didn't realise that the photos were his, I thought he was just one of those pricks who take photos from other sources + slaps on those watermarks.

Still, some great photos have been ruined.

[ViraA]

Small consolation, but at least they died together.