[TheCruxofBag]

A man and a teenager died inside a car, parked in the garage of a house, in the city center of Campo Alegre de Lourdes, in the North region of Bahia state, Brazil. The case happened on Tuesday (16) and the police are treating it as an accident.

The victims were identified as J.L.d.S., 33 years old, and C.F.d.S., 17 years old. According to the municipal police station, they were last seen alive entering the garage.

The owner of the garage, who was a friend of J., alerted police when she couldn't get a hold of him. J.'s body was found shirtless, and C.'s body was found without shorts. The car was turned off, and the key was in the ignition.

A report from the IML confirmed that death was caused by asphyxiation by carbon monoxide.

[SimoneFlen']

Poor kid. No sympathy for the nonce though.

[lovelylucinda]

Brilliant post thank youit has me very intrigued as to how it was an accident? If so what caused the carbon monoxide? Did they lose consciousness before they realised anything was amiss? So many questions

[Yoloman]

Looks like they didn't get to what they were there for. Disappointing end to life.

[William May]

Probably had the air conditioner running with the car on, and were getting ready for sex, but got overcome by CO, and died. Maybe no money for a motel room.

Why do you consider him a nonce? Looks to me like just 2 people planning on fucking. Part of the empowerment of girls is their responsibility to decide if they want to fuck or not. You either want equality, or not. But you can't have it both ways.

Read Chrissy Hind's book about her career. She tells about EVERY notable sex event, but NOT ONCE DOES SHE EVER CLAIM TO HAVE BEEN RAPED. She states she was ALWAYS there BY HER OWN CHOICE, AND THEREFORE HAD TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR HER OWN CONDUCT. She doesn't mention the word "rape" EVEN ONCE in the entire book. (Even the time she had to blow 5 bikers at an abandoned house, she ascribes to her own poor judgment and desire to get drugs.)

Just like with men, you EITHER WANT TO FUCK, OR YOU DON'T. Don't blame others for the decision YOU made!

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by William May ↗

Why do you consider him a nonce?

He was a 33 year old man in a relationship with a 17 year old child. That's fucking disgusting.

[William May]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

He was a 33 year old man in a relationship with a 17 year old child. That's fucking disgusting.

Sorry, but PURE BS! A 17 year old is old enough to know if they want to fuck or not. That's what it comes down to.

12-13, you are right. But by 17, you will be lucky to find someone who's still a virgin. In fact, you'd probably be lucky to find a 15 year old who's a virgin. Just the hard facts. Sorry about reality.

[Annihilator]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

He was a 33 year old man in a relationship with a 17 year old child. That's fucking disgusting.

I could have suggested that the girl was a prostitute (no.1 reason why a young girl would fuck a man twice his age). Or maybe the girl saw his Volkswagen on the street and climaxed for his wealth.

But without any evidence, let just assume they had sex due to pure love. We gotta think positive, right?

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by William May ↗

Sorry, but PURE BS! A 17 year old is old enough to know if they want to fuck or not. That's what it comes down to.

12-13, you are right. But by 17, you will be lucky to find someone who's still a virgin. In fact, you'd probably be lucky to find a 15 year old who's a virgin. Just the hard facts. Sorry about reality.

I'm not disputing that teenagers have sexual urges (I myself was an overly horny teen back in the 90s!). My issue is a grown man, in his 30s, having relations with a child. If you, or anyone else, can't see a problem with that, then that's on you.

[William May]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

I'm not disputing that teenagers have sexual urges (I myself was an overly horny teen back in the 90s!). My issue is a grown man, in his 30s, having relations with a child. If you, or anyone else, can't see a problem with that, then that's on you.

Sorry, but my sympathies pretty much ended during the "Me Too" movement. They interviewed some girl who, at the time of the event, was 16 years old, was riding in a limousine with half her clothes off, drinking champagne, and en-route to the Playboy mansion to join a party.

That was when my moral compass got dislodged. If a girl is THAT STUPID, then she shouldn't even be out in public. If she's NOT THAT STUPID, then she is responsible for her own situation, (Just like Chrissy Hind noted in her biography) These chicks are not being tied down and having their clothes cut off. They are willingly discarding them so they can have sex. PERIOD.

If someone is flying you in their private jet to their private beach, THEY ARE NOT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF YOU. THEY ARE ACCEPTING WHAT YOU ARE OFFERING.

If someone just picked you up in a limousine, and is taking you somewhere so you can join a party. you should accept that the fact is you are there as a sexual item. You are NOT riding in the limousine because your grasp of geography is so stunning.

You can always say NO.

But if you say YES, then you have forfeited the right to alter history afterwards.

Accept your responsibilities as a free and independent woman, making your own decisions, and live with them. JUST LIKE EVERYONE ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE.

Please go read Chrissy Hind's biography. It will straighten you out on your misguided moral judgements regarding females having sex. Just like men are expected to "grow a pair of balls!", women need to "Grow a pair of ovaries!" Just like guys, when you make a bad decision, YOU LIVE WITH IT AND LEARN FROM IT!

They KNOW perfectly well what they are DOING. They were NOT loaded on those private jets at gunpoint. They were asked if they wanted to go to a private island and party, and THEY SAID YES. If they are now so horrified by it, WHY DID THEY GO ON THESE TRIPS 10-30 TIMES OVER A COUPLE YEAR PERIOD?

If you took these trips more than once, then your claims of rape are totally suspect. Not only that, but you totally negate and tarnish LEGITIMATE RAPE CLAIMS by women who ACTUALLY WERE VICTIMIZED. Who does that serve?

I'm sorry, Simone, but in this case you don't know what you are talking about.