[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by GreenTsamurai ↗

Idc how much of a reliable contributor a person is. No info in any objective standard is bad report

This ain't mainstream fuckin news. Our standards here for information are lower. Do we prefer it? Of course. And soares often provides it. But sometimes with photos of this nature, it simply IS NOT available. And in those instances, we (and by we I mean the Staff here at DR) prefer to have photos without concrete info to no photos at all. Especially in slow news months like this one.

A lot of the stuff Soares contributes here comes directly from social media leaks provided from people on site at the crime scene and not from police reports or professional reporting. His geographic location gives him better access than ANY of our other contributors can provide to some of these scenes, both because the social media groups themselves are local and because his command of the language is vastly superior to many of us.

He does the best that he can and sometimes that simply results in very fresh, un-replicated photos with a dearth of concrete information and we accept that.

Cut him some slack or go do the damned research yourself.

[Kelseecat65]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

Because a name and a location are often all that are needed to obtain antemortem images from social media and we do not typically publish names/specific locations here.

In this particular instance, we know the photos are 'fucken related' because they were posted by a reliable, frequent contributor with good access to a certain area.

I love how you never fail to amuse!!