|
#21
●
11-18-2010, 08:02 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:1944 male Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 259 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 5 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Anatomical Crucifixion
Yes exactly, as the argument was valid and interesting(I thought anyway)clearly they were not just some morbid idiots(like me) who were bored, they had a lot of taboos going on here. Most would not approve to say the least. It took some balls to do this,its controversial even by today's standards and open minded interpretation. In 1801? Man forget about it! But do you think its art? It definitely makes you think.  |
|
#23
●
11-21-2010, 09:28 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:9378 o3<= Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 16 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 6 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Anatomical Crucifixion
That's Gunther von Hagens. He "plastinates" whole bodies and parts of bodies of dead people and animals. The exhibition is called "Körperwelten". His exhibit of a copulating couple caused the biggest waves lately: |
|
#26
●
03-29-2013, 09:14 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:173 Imma Girl=Wills Babygirl✿☠ Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 8,888 Mentioned: 7 Post(s) Quoted: 775 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Anatomical Crucifixion
They shouldve done it when he was Live not Memorex His mere wieght wouldve pulled his hands and feet from those nail/bolts. Nail him in the wrists between the bones...he wouldve stayed up for days. Just saying  |
