[SinisterNm]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

Don’t know if you mean those but damn those were great/amazing


Those soldier videos will boost morale which is great. Didn’t know there were that many American mercenaries (they all appear to be American) there, enough to form a group at least

yes exactly. i think they scrubbed the net of the best one. "Heh Heh i drove a Lincoln before they paid me to do it"
the vibe and that music. vids have been fairly comical this month, the Russians acting like babies after the nade drops are the most odd. almost as odd as the way you spelled volunteer, lol

[Faust]

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

Energodar. I'm sure these two Chechens with Kalashnikovs are only there for the security of the referendum "collectors".

I believe this is how people often vote in areas where there was civil war, let alone terrorist attacks on ‘collaborators’ (even teachers), not to mention in this case also threats of the previous government of up to 15 years jail time for actually voting.

I cannot post them here because I don’t want to draw too much parallels to previous conflicts, but if you google image this you will see it is not uncommon to see a voting process protected by AKs or M4 rifles. Sometimes even both together in 1 photo.

In conclusion: weapons are often used to provide security and allow for safe elections with less chance of terrorist attacks.

[duntez]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

I believe this is how people often vote in areas where there was civil war, let alone terrorist attacks on ‘collaborators’ (even teachers), not to mention in this case also threats of the previous government of up to 15 years jail time for actually voting.

I cannot post them here because I don’t want to draw too much parallels to previous conflicts, but if you google image this you will see it is not uncommon to see a voting process protected by AKs or M4 rifles. Sometimes even both together in 1 photo.

In conclusion: weapons are often used to provide security and allow for safe elections with less chance of terrorist attacks.

He intentionally doesn’t want look at it like that, unfortunately. Even though it makes a perfect sense.

[Faust]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

He intentionally doesn’t want look at it like that, unfortunately. Even though it makes a perfect sense.

In all fairness, would you answer your door to people carrying assault rifles?
(Not even talking about potential jail time if you do)

I’d count all non voters as a “no” -vote personally btw

[Boneface]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

Boneface would you be willing to post the Zelensky-clip here? I cannot find it on YouTube and thus cannot download it. Also I don’t want to take the credit for it but I think it could be an interesting point of discussion

Fazzam.

[duntez]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

In all fairness, would you answer your door to people carrying assault rifles?
(Not even talking about potential jail time if you do)

I’d count all non voters as a “no” -vote personally btw

If I was there now? Absolutely, because I know they are not a threat by any mean.

Even after a person voted, they fold the paper and drop it in, those guards wouldn’t even see it what they answered, like if it’s a NO they going to draw a gun at them?

The same was in Krimea and everything was fine.

[AnonX93]

Don’t be so naive…even if they aren’t pointing their weapons at the citizenry forcing them to vote yes…it’s the implication that it could happen that makes people vote yes.

[Faust]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

If I was there now? Absolutely, because I know they are not a threat by any mean.

Even after a person voted, they fold the paper and drop it in, those guards wouldn’t even see it what they answered, like if it’s a NO they going to draw a gun at them?

The same was in Krimea and everything was fine.

I agree 100%, but still, try and see this from a more western perspective;
The ‘casted’ votes in the box are probably all blanks. They have a person vote and put it in the ballot box. Then they could open it and easily see what the person voted; if they voted “NO” they get deported to a concentration camp or gulag or tortured killed and put in a mass grave. So that is why the results can never be trusted because people are too scared to even vote

[Faust]

Originally Posted by Boneface ↗

Fazzam.

So much gold in the video!

The guy Zelensky mentions is this motherf-

https://www.timesofisrael.com/contro...anned-from-us/

Kolomoisky actually paid for the Zelensky campaigns and TV series! Also he paid for Azov if you can believe that

“ Even though the Azov Battalion was co-founded by Biletsky, who previously led the radical right group Patriot of Ukraine, the group was armed by the state and partly funded by local oligarchs in eastern Ukraine. That funding included money from the Jewish tycoon Ihor Kolomoisky, Ritzmann said. The US State Department sanctioned Kolomoisky in March 2021. The previous year, the US Justice Department placed him under investigation on accusations of embezzlement and fraud. ”

https://edition.cnn.com/2022/03/29/e...cmd/index.html

Of course there are even more points in that video but for now I think this is interesting to discuss

[duntez]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

I agree 100%, but still, try and see this from a more western perspective;
The ‘casted’ votes in the box are probably all blanks. They have a person vote and put it in the ballot box. Then they could open it and easily see what the person voted; if they voted “NO” they get deported to a concentration camp or gulag or tortured killed and put in a mass grave. So that is why the results can never be trusted because people are too scared to even vote