[scorpion9]

Originally Posted by Pokemon ↗

Why is not this putlers pigs
blocked??!!

Well, he is behaving now. Decent video descriptions and all, plus, its important to see footage from both sides.

[WhiskeyOutpost]

✅ A couple dead Rus, one got shredded by artillery/mortar. Work of 37th Marine Brigade, somewhere in the south

✅ RU T-72B3 tank complete with a camouflaged cope cage + engine fire

✅ Ukrainian drone records Russian on Russian violence

✅ Russians are targeted with AGS fire. UA 36th Marine Brigade

#deadru #artillerymortar #t72 #friendlyfire (? ) #ags

[tryder055]

Azov storm a russian position of the 57th motorized rifle brigade elimination of the Russian commander with a shot from a meter, more new 200s, the escape of personnel, the capture of prisoners

#fpv #closecombat #droneviewassault #rupow #artillerymortar #deadru #surrender

[WhiskeyOutpost]

✅ Reportedly Wagner vehicles (with civilians around) targeted by Russian airstrike in Veronezh, Russia

✅ UA "Ochi" air reconnaissance unit targets Russian tanks in the Kurdyumivka area, south of Bakhmut.

✅ "Magyar" from UA 59th Brigade shows the work of an R-18 heavy drone on Russian BMP-1's and a Ural truck
-repost removed: https://www.documentingreality.com/f...ml#post7974586

#russiancivilwar #civilian #apcifv #donetsk #dronefpv

[Faust]

Originally Posted by ljubodrag ↗

■ Orekhov area, June 26. The UA losses from a recent battle, up to 23 armored vehicles can be seen throughout the video.

■ 11 minutes of dystopian footage. No gore and not much blood. Aftermath of the first big scale fight of the NATO trained and equipped 47th OMBr.

■ Ghanimini.

We see a Ukrainian soldier jumping on a landmine, that was pretty gory IMO.

[luc21]

Russian soldiers reportedly slice one of their ex comrades throats after he allegedly pledged alliance to Wagner PMC during the failed possibly 'scripted' 'Russian Rebellion'This footage has not been verified.

#warexecution #questionable

[WhiskeyOutpost]

✅ "An artillery strike on a Russian supply column near the settlement of Novohorivka, which is located along the highway between Vasylivka and Tokmak (Zaporizhia oblast). Our fighters successfully destroyed 7 KamAZ-5350 trucks, which were accumulated by the occupiers near the road."

✅ Captured/surrendered Russians being transported. "In the southern direction, the fighters of the 18th battalion of the 35th separate brigade of marines deliver a fresh batch of captured invaders with a breeze."

✅ Some UA forces on counterattack in the Bakhmut area found some long dead Russians. According to them Russians simply left them to rot.

#artillerymortar #convoy #zaporizhzhia #rupow #fpv #deadru #cookoff #bakhmut

[AmigoBandar]

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

Ukrainian drone records Russian on Russian violence

Not a very happy camper.

[WonderMomma]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

Your video has a different aspect ratio as it is edited; the Russian MOD logo is cut off from it. The Russian MOD posted it hours before your sources edited the video and attached their own story to it. Compare the videos and you will see it, better yet post them here for everybody to compare and see

Jesus christ Faust.

1. Your video and my video side by side. Yours on the left, mine on the right. Yours in open in VLC and mine is open in Windows media player. Everything within the video is the same except the watermarks. The same two lines of dragons teeth, the same line of buildings/houses near the top. The same divisions in the field to the left. Everything in the end of the video is the same as well. They're both 45 seconds long. It has not been edited beyond the cut to the different perspective at the end, nor has it been cropped. As far as we know, your watermark was slapped on after the fact. My source shared the SAME video without it and it wasn't cropped out, which tells me your logo was added after the fact. Watermarks in a video don't mean shit for the origin of a video unless they have been cropped out. Which is not the case here.


2. Your video has been compressed slightly but that doesn't matter. It only affects the quality and file size. Your video is 11483a and mine is 11483. 350p (normally 360p is standard) vs. 480p. So your source compressed the video.



3. Technically, the logo on your video is the state run TV channel which is owned by the Russian MoD. Not the Russian MoD itself. This, in and of itself, makes it more questionable unless you're trying to argue that the Russian government doesn't ever put fake shit out, which given you argue that RT news is COMPLETELY trustworthy, wouldn't surprise me.



4. I repeat... there is NO CONTINUOUS AMMO COOKOFF that you would expect to see. It's more consistent to other videos of other piles of mines exploding than it is with an ammo stash cooking off.

5. The video is questionable on both ends but Russian sources have more of a history of lying and faking footage. When there is questionable evidence about a video and I have alternative information, I'm going to share it. I know what I believe, and I know what you believe... but this footage is still questionable regardless. Until more information or verification is found, this remains undetermined. End of discussion.

#questionable

[Faust]

Originally Posted by WonderMomma ↗

Jesus christ Faust.

1. Your video and my video side by side. Yours on the left, mine on the right. Yours in open in VLC and mine is open in Windows media player. Everything within the video is the same except the watermarks. The same two lines of dragons teeth, the same line of buildings/houses near the top. The same divisions in the field to the left. Everything in the end of the video is the same as well. They're both 45 seconds long. It has not been edited beyond the cut to the different perspective at the end, nor has it been cropped. As far as we know, your watermark was slapped on after the fact. My source shared the SAME video without it and it wasn't cropped out, which tells me your logo was added after the fact. Watermarks in a video don't mean shit for the origin of a video unless they have been cropped out. Which is not the case here.
Attachment 1191253

2. Your video has been compressed slightly but that doesn't matter. It only affects the quality and file size. Your video is 11483a and mine is 11483. 350p (normally 360p is standard) vs. 480p. So your source compressed the video.
Attachment 1191254
Attachment 1191255

3. Technically, the logo on your video is the state run TV channel which is owned by the Russian MoD. Not the Russian MoD itself. This, in and of itself, makes it more questionable unless you're trying to argue that the Russian government doesn't ever put fake shit out, which given you argue that RT news is COMPLETELY trustworthy, wouldn't surprise me.
Attachment 1191259
Attachment 1191260

4. I repeat... there is NO CONTINUOUS AMMO COOKOFF that you would expect to see. It's more consistent to other videos of other piles of mines exploding than it is with an ammo stash cooking off.

5. The video is questionable on both ends but Russian sources have more of a history of lying and faking footage. When there is questionable evidence about a video and I have alternative information, I'm going to share it. I know what I believe, and I know what you believe... but this footage is still questionable regardless. Until more information or verification is found, this remains undetermined. End of discussion.

#questionable

Sorry with the Russian MOD video I meant this one;
(Which is the one I assumed I uploaded). I never saw your video but I imagined it would have been cropped if uploaded at a later date and with another watermark. The Russian MOD ones are always very solid but if there exist multiple versions all with the same aspect ratio then the original file must have been circulating (you can remove watermarks but I didn’t study the footage). Also the fact that the MOD one is 720P / larger does not really say anything as it could have easily been rendered like that after the logo was added. So I agree with your questionable statement; I assumed the MOD one was the original one as it was uploaded earlier, but we now have 3 different logo files so I am guessing one exists without the watermark but yeah, I’ll agree with your sentiment on this one!