[Rfneimad]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

So anyone can win any conflict if they shuffle some units around? But this seems interesting, however, it does not take into account the US providing better quality satellite footage of enemy positions. Also the US weapons could have better accuracy, and there are other factors.

It seems a bit like boxing, if the other one has a longer reach then if all things are equal, he can keep punching the opponent. If the opponent has better leg work and can move around faster in the ring, the longer reach is not that dangerous.

I am not saying your side is winning or losing, just stating the facts

Well either way Nazis are winning or losing depending on what side you are on, so we all win!

[duntez]

Originally Posted by Rfneimad ↗

Are you still sleeping on the couch?

Hey google won't translate this, I wonder what does it say?

Nah, next day by observing an enemy position from a safe distance I came to a conclusion that the best D is and O and took over her position when she was not there, then she just had to deal with it

“Whiskey and intersect - gaybitches which making orgies with other guy”

[Rfneimad]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

Nah, next day by observing an enemy position from a safe distance I came to a conclusion that the best D is and O and took over her position when she was not there, then she just had to deal with it



“Whiskey and intersect - gaybitches which making orgies with other guy”

[Faust]

Great that everybody is well again

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

Nah, next day by observing an enemy position from a safe distance I came to a conclusion that the best D is and O and took over her position when she was not there, then she just had to deal with it

“Whiskey and intersect - gaybitches which making orgies with other guy”

I prefer squinty Slavic looking girls.

[WhiskeyOutpost]

-

[Faust]

Originally Posted by WhiskeyOutpost ↗

I prefer squinty Slavic looking girls.

That UKR woman in charge…

If I was 15 years older, I’d be on her side (s)

[Rfneimad]

https://kenigtiger.livejournal.com

He has a very interesting entry up regarding civilian deaths.

[Faust]

Originally Posted by Rfneimad ↗

https://kenigtiger.livejournal.com

He has a very interesting entry up regarding civilian deaths.

They are saying something about Minsk so they will probably be biased against Ukraine. That does not make it lies it’s just: how objective are you when some of your family members or villagers have been killed by an army?

Still, interesting source will try and read through it later!

[Rfneimad]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

They are saying something about Minsk so they will probably be biased against Ukraine. That does not make it lies it’s just: how objective are you when some of your family members or villagers have been killed by an army?

Still, interesting source will try and read through it later!

Well its interesting he talks about the allies in WWII having higher civ casualties, yet neglects to mention they seem to have been working on reducing civ casualties ever since then with all the magic ordinance. I can see he is genuinely distraught by the dills shelling Donetsk and Luhansk since 2014.

I have never felt the urge to go fight somewhere because civilians are killed on my "side". Even 9/11 just made me scratch my head and wonder how the fuck we pissed them off and fucked our security up so bad.

I have met so many people from all over the world and most are nice ordinary people, our real enemy are the douchebags in our own societies. But douchebags make great soldiers so yeah they kill civilians if not supervised. Also douchebags make great charasmatic leaders I've noticed.