[sunairco]

The recent botched or "difficult" executions begs for a better and humane method. There's so many better ways even with the gurney to eterinity to leave this plane of existance.

Personally, I'm against execution. I'd rather as a taxpayer to fund the miserable, conteplative existance of an individual for a capital crime rather then have the blood of another human being on my hands.

Yet, there's several uneplored options that would be relatively painless. My dad related how many servicemen he served with in Korea that literally went to sleep comfortablly and froze to death. A heavily sedated condemed could be placed in a freezing chamber and literally come out a "stiff". I doubt the public would accept a method like that, but it is viable.

Inert gasses that displace oxygen would be another. A nitrogen chamber would almost be ideal. The person would probably not even notice it.

We're far from the barbaric societies like the mideast. We'd be better off with permanant incarceration.

Yet, there should be a better way if extermination by judicial decree needs to continue.

If this about a need for a victim's family for closure and they need the spectacle of the trangressor's death being witnessed, Nitrogen is the way to go.

Anyone with a better idea?

[spudigitti]

bullet....

[jackhunter21]

Originally Posted by sunairco ↗

The recent botched or "difficult" executions begs for a better and humane method. There's so many better ways even with the gurney to eterinity to leave this plane of existance.

Personally, I'm against execution. I'd rather as a taxpayer to fund the miserable, conteplative existance of an individual for a capital crime rather then have the blood of another human being on my hands.

Supporting the "miserable" "existence of an individual for a capital crime" does still leave blood on your hands. The only people who have a right to punish another are the victims and their families. Third parties who weren't wronged by another have no right punishing that person. I understand that for the safety of individuals and their property certain people need to be confined (some for a while and some forever) for real crime (murder, rape, habitual theft) but that does not mean they should be treated poorly and made miserable. They should be treated well.

Personally I have no problem with a victim or a victim's family punishing a perpetrator as long as it is fully verified the guy did it. If a father does something to a guy who did something horrible to his wife, son or daughter I would vote not guilty on jury. But as soon as third parties get involved those third parties become perpetrators themselves if they mistreat and subject to poor miserable conditions those who they hold captive.

[jackhunter21]

Anyway, I don't think the government should be deciding who lives and who dies.

[The Krokodil]

If I could choose a way to die I would OD myslelf by getting drunk as shit and popping different pills. I would pass out first like any drunk and then never wake up!

[rapeWhistle]

I say we let the family of the victim(s) choose the punishment.

[oldnorseman]

The cruelest punishment would be to force a person to sit through an entire Barbra Streisand movie.

[Oswald2001]

Drop them in a live volcano.

[Desensitisation]

Guillotine. Seriously. It's quick, minimal maintenance except a bit of grease and sharpening the blade.

[-NocturnalPulse-]

Originally Posted by The Krokodil ↗

If I could choose a way to die I would OD myslelf by getting drunk as shit and popping different pills. I would pass out first like any drunk and then never wake up!

Or just shoot up a shit ton of heroin. How my dad did it. Didn't seem like he suffered at all just passed out and never woke up..