JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat 

Current Rating:

Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Thread Tools
  #1  
12-21-2012, 04:15 PM
Sharon's Avatar
Sharon
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:34
Female
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 43,403
Contributions: 204
 
Mentioned: 95 Post(s)
Quoted: 2281 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss43403
Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

That was very sad and eerie
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Real Car Crashes & Car Accident Videos
View Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #2  
12-22-2012, 01:50 AM
Hangman's Avatar
Hangman
Offline:
★ Legacy Member ★
Poster Rank:135
I Have 2 Heads
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 12,093
 
Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Quoted: 4672 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss12093
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat


Awesome.
  #3  
12-25-2012, 12:28 AM
LadyCPlum's Avatar
LadyCPlum
Offline:
★ Legacy Member ★
Poster Rank:192
All woman
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 7,782
 
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Quoted: 1420 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss7782
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

I always despair over the fact that the "first responders" weren't told about the radiation levels, so they were the first to die after those killed in the initial explosion. Cancers and behavioral problems are still on the rise in children born near the Pripyat area. There's actually a UNICEF center in Kiev that cares for children who have been affected by the meltdown. And it'll be hundreds of years before the area is anywhere near habitable again. (Although.....it always confused me that Hiroshima and Nagasaki appear to be fine, I haven't heard much about any rise in cancers or other diseases due to the radiation there, and if I'm not mistaken far more radioactive materials were used in the bombs, so why isn't Chernobyl safe yet?)
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
Bletch
  #4  
12-26-2012, 12:44 AM
5umguy24's Avatar
5umguy24
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2708
Male
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 152
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss152
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/QuweBEy0NG4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Never thought I see a fan of S.T.A.L.K.E.R. in DR.
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
mp5sd
  #5  
12-26-2012, 01:07 AM
Eskimo Aids's Avatar
Eskimo Aids
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:3114
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 123
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss123
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

I always despair over the fact that the "first responders" weren't told about the radiation levels, so they were the first to die after those killed in the initial explosion. Cancers and behavioral problems are still on the rise in children born near the Pripyat area. There's actually a UNICEF center in Kiev that cares for children who have been affected by the meltdown. And it'll be hundreds of years before the area is anywhere near habitable again. (Although.....it always confused me that Hiroshima and Nagasaki appear to be fine, I haven't heard much about any rise in cancers or other diseases due to the radiation there, and if I'm not mistaken far more radioactive materials were used in the bombs, so why isn't Chernobyl safe yet?)
that's because the bomb was detonate thousands of feet in the air as opposed to Chernobyl wear it leaked/ blew up at ground level. Also the amount of radioactivity In the bombs dropped over nagaski and Hiroshima were minsucle in comparison to the Chernobyl reactor.
  #6  
12-26-2012, 04:12 AM
bombed's Avatar
bombed
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1806
Female
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 285
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss285
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

Thanks for posting! That was a really cool movie . I'm honestly quite surprised that these guys went into the city and that highly radioactive room in the end.
  #7  
01-05-2013, 11:29 AM
Faline's Avatar
Faline
Offline:
My Rank: MAJOR
Poster Rank:11
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 93,130
Contributions: 226
 
Mentioned: 91 Post(s)
Quoted: 2009 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss93130
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

  #8  
01-06-2013, 11:50 AM
b0g's Avatar
b0g
Offline:
My Rank: MASTER SERGEANT
Poster Rank:563
mc²
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,724
 
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 299 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1724
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

I always despair over the fact that the "first responders" weren't told about the radiation levels, so they were the first to die after those killed in the initial explosion. Cancers and behavioral problems are still on the rise in children born near the Pripyat area. There's actually a UNICEF center in Kiev that cares for children who have been affected by the meltdown. And it'll be hundreds of years before the area is anywhere near habitable again. (Although.....it always confused me that Hiroshima and Nagasaki appear to be fine, I haven't heard much about any rise in cancers or other diseases due to the radiation there, and if I'm not mistaken far more radioactive materials were used in the bombs, so why isn't Chernobyl safe yet?)
I must disagree with the explanation about the different radiation levels. Do you really think that the fall out pattern of a sky detonation (about 50-100 meters about the ground at Hiroshima) is very different than a explosion (due to extreme heat) of a reactor dome on a windy day????
This confusion of fact and fantasy reminds me of the Fukushima directors who neglected the Japanese engineers warning that a 6 meter high tsunami dike is not enough.

the Uranium of H and N was pure high enriched U. the first ever produced. It never was in a reactor, so not contaminated by side products as Plutonium which most reactors produced at 86.
The half life times of the Plutonium decay products (in fact series) are broader in range, which means longer and shorter. The longer decay times , 50 - 2000+ years, are the trouble in the Pripiat region.
  #9  
04-24-2013, 01:08 AM
PreciousFox15's Avatar
PreciousFox15
Offline:
My Rank: CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1669
Female
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 325
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss325
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

Thank you very much. Extremly interesting
  #10  
06-01-2013, 10:38 AM
Bletch's Avatar
Bletch
Offline:
My Rank: MAJOR
Poster Rank:118
Male
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 13,427
 
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Quoted: 3534 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 17/20
Today Posts
1/11 ssss13427
Re: Inside Cernobyl/Pripyat

Thanks for this top class post! Very interesting and eerie. The radiation levels on the firemen's clothing are astounding! Horrible, the amount the men received themselves :-(


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO