[lobo221]

A declassified report by a CIA spy contains so-far-unknown claims that Soviets carried out mass killings of their own citizens in Poland soon after the end of World War II, the niezalezna.pl website has reported.

The report, dated 10 October 1952, contains shocking claims about the activities of Soviet forces occupying Poland following the end of the war, the Reporters.pl website added.
Reporters.pl cited the CIA agent as saying in his report: “A Polish eyewitness told me that in the forest of Witomin [near the Polish port city of Gdynia] over 10,000 Soviets are buried in mass graves.
“They were shot by the Soviets themselves just after World War II. They were Soviet workers who had been repatriated from Germany.”
The next sentence in the report has been deleted.
The CIA agent’s report does not give more details but, amid a mass of information about military deployments and the social and economic situation in Polish coastal areas at the time, in another section mentions other crimes by Soviet soldiers.
The agent reported that Soviet infantry, armoured forces and anti-aircraft guns, around a division in terms of strength, were stationed in a forest near the Baltic Sea city of Kołobrzeg, according to niezalezna.pl
“The morale and discipline of these troops has deteriorated considerably,” the agent is quoted as saying.
“Cases of Soviet soldiers attacking Polish girls are more and more frequent. In certain cases, women have been murdered, to liquidate all traces. These cases are, of course, never mentioned publicly.”
(pk)
Source: niezalezna.pl, reporters.pl

Source

[William May]

When Soviet troops who had been captured by the Germans were repatriated at the end of the war, they got their "Victory Return" parade in Moscow, and at the end of the parade, they were all shipped off to labor camps for 25 year terms. Stalin felt any Soviet who had surrendered was probably a foreign agent. Even the resistance communists who stayed in German occupied territory and did spying and made partisan attacks on the Germans, were arrested and sent to camps. It was pretty bad.

[FunkPumpkin]

That reminds me of an old Pollock joke:

Q: What do you call 10,000 Pollocks at the bottom of a mass grave?

A: Um, proof that Stalin was a mass murderer that has never been judged comparable to Adolf Hitler, which he was. *rim-shot* *crickets*

[bob351]

Originally Posted by FunkPumpkin ↗

That reminds me of an old Pollock joke:

Q: What do you call 10,000 Pollocks at the bottom of a mass grave?

A: Um, proof that Stalin was a mass murderer that has never been judged comparable to Adolf Hitler, which he was. *rim-shot* *crickets*

Pollock is a fish.


Its Polack.




Not sure where you went to school but stalin is far from a good guy in anything I learnt. Both quite evil and had armies of loyal evil men working for them "following orders".

That being said stalin helped the west beat hitler, so he wins a few brownie points in the records of history, arguing who is worse is debatable and depends on your unit of measure, I've had this debate in university, made for an interesting class to say the least. Sheer numbers, mao wins. Personally there is much more to it than just a body count.

[FunkPumpkin]

Originally Posted by bob351 ↗

Pollock is a fish.

Its Polack.

Not sure where you went to school but stalin is far from a good guy in anything I learnt. Both quite evil and had armies of loyal evil men working for them "following orders".

That being said stalin helped the west beat hitler, so he wins a few brownie points in the records of history, arguing who is worse is debatable and depends on your unit of measure, I've had this debate in university, made for an interesting class to say the least. Sheer numbers, mao wins. Personally there is much more to it than just a body count.

You might be right. please accept my apologies... it's been several decades since I heard a Pollock/Polack joke. I grew up in a US steel town, but my upbringing did not end up there.

But unless you know what a "Stosh" is, you haven't owned my steel-town-ass yet.

[Steve]

Originally Posted by bob351 ↗

Pollock is a fish.


Its Polack.




Not sure where you went to school but stalin is far from a good guy in anything I learnt. Both quite evil and had armies of loyal evil men working for them "following orders".

That being said stalin helped the west beat hitler, so he wins a few brownie points in the records of history, arguing who is worse is debatable and depends on your unit of measure, I've had this debate in university, made for an interesting class to say the least. Sheer numbers, mao wins. Personally there is much more to it than just a body count.

Stalin was much much worse than Hitler could ever be, that seems to get swept under the rug because of his involvement in winning the war. He killed his own people mostly by starvation when he took away their land and sold of their crops abroad. Even Hitler wouldn't have gone that far.

[TheVrist]

Lenin-Stalin's Russia murdered 20 million of their own before Hitler was a blip on the globalist's radar.

Hitler's genocide happened after declarations of war, and most deaths could have been a result of that as well.

If we reflected, those genocides in Hitler's world, could have gone prevented, whilist, no one gave two shits about the Genocides already happening just a few hundred mile east.

They're both monsters- on entirely different levels. Non-comparable.

[Oswald2001]

This approach should be taken with ISIS and al Qaeda.

Then march directly to Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iran and straighten out the locations of the biggest moo slum tumors.


Mecca should go...at the very least.

[bob351]

Originally Posted by Top Gear ↗

Stalin was much much worse than Hitler could ever be, that seems to get swept under the rug because of his involvement in winning the war. He killed his own people mostly by starvation when he took away their land and sold of their crops abroad. Even Hitler wouldn't have gone that far.

What the fuck are you talking about? Yeah everyone knows the prisoners in the camps were very well fed. Also tons of food in the walled ghettos. Famine was used by both of them, most of the prisoners of the nazis died of starvation, ever seen a pile of dead prisoners from ww2, not a single fatty among them. Lets not forget cataloging prisoners like cattle by branding them with tattoo and other means. There are many things stalin and mao never did that hitler did, also hitler was the aggressor in many cases not only killing his own countrymen but importing people from other nations for extermination.


Ignorance is the problem debating the evil of these men, some like to turn it into a pissing contest for whatever reason and downplay either side. Another problem is blaming it on a handful of people instead of the nations that caused this and those that supported it. Neither hitler nor stalin nor mao or any other genocidal fuck could have achieved their aims without massive populace support.

[bob351]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Lenin-Stalin's Russia murdered 20 million of their own before Hitler was a blip on the globalist's radar.

Hitler's genocide happened after declarations of war, and most deaths could have been a result of that as well.

If we reflected, those genocides in Hitler's world, could have gone prevented, whilist, no one gave two shits about the Genocides already happening just a few hundred mile east.

They're both monsters- on entirely different levels. Non-comparable.

Nobody gave a shit about the holocaust either, ww2 was not fought to end genocide. That was a byproduct of hitler losing the war, and like you said only ended the genocides committed by the nazis and japanese, he would have continued his ethnic cleansing like stalin was able to since he was never toppled.

Lets not forget after the jews, hitler would have been overjoyed to throw the entire russian population into the ovens as well. Basically anyone non aryan was going to die had he not have been stopped.

He was just stopped well before his vision of the world could happen, he already had shit in place like the hunger plan to wipe out the soviets entirely, paling in comparison to what stalin achieved. Stalin and Mao had time on their hands and still only achieved a relatively comparable number.

Also the camps were running well before the outbreak of ww2.

Huge misconception by many who like to think the allies were on a noble crusade.

The harsh truth is most genocides happen because nobody gave a shit that it was happening, many supported them, all could have been prevented.



Plus there are also generational genocides who dont have a hitler or stalin or anyone in particular to point a finger at, such as the native american genocide.