[30564U]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

I'm sure people are use to me throwing random perspectives by now. Sometimes even things I don't believe myself.

Whatever you do don't question the DRAPB. You'll end up having to have someone start your car for you in the mornings. My only hope is that they'll all get so emotional in their raving responses that they'll swallow their lying tongues. Since I've blocked them all I can still see them posting in a desperate hope that their responses will somehow be heard by me, but I can't read them. It's like watching someone claw at a window but not being able to hear them...it's kinda cool.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by Mr Poo ↗

Possibly.. He could easily have put her in a bad situation, I don't know if going to a store would constitute that however. Or maybe it's just a coverup for a mistake, who knows..

Vague journalism, leaves us hangin, yo!.



Gives us somthing to argue about though.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by 30564U ↗

Whatever you do don't question the DRAPB. You'll end up having to have someone start your car for you in the mornings. My only hope is that they'll all get so emotional in their raving responses that they'll swallow their lying tongues. Since I've blocked them all I can still see them posting in a desperate hope that their responses will somehow be heard by me, but I can't read them. It's like watching someone claw at a window but not being able to hear them...it's kinda cool.

Run little boy run..

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by 30564U ↗

Whatever you do don't question the DRAPB. You'll end up having to have someone start your car for you in the mornings. My only hope is that they'll all get so emotional in their raving responses that they'll swallow their lying tongues. Since I've blocked them all I can still see them posting in a desperate hope that their responses will somehow be heard by me, but I can't read them. It's like watching someone claw at a window but not being able to hear them...it's kinda cool.

Meh, I just take what people say at face value. I'm sure many just argue, for the sake of arguing

But none the less, when you respond, you're still getting your message, or opinions read by those not involved. So it's not always a total waste of time.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Vague journalism, leaves us hangin, yo!.



Gives us somthing to argue about though.

Strange situation, really though. Why would the police shoot into the window either way the situation happened? If Lee was driving at the officer, how did he have the clear frame of mind to only use non-lethal rounds if the person was driving at them which is felony attempted assault.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Meh, I just take what people say at face value. I'm sure many just argue, for the sake of arguing

But none the less, when you respond, you're still getting your message, or opinions read by those not involved. So it's not always a total waste of time.

He goes into threads of people he blocks to post his opinions without seeing theirs.. Typical pussy behavior.

[30564U]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Meh, I just take what people say at face value. I'm sure many just argue, for the sake of arguing

But none the less, when you respond, you're still getting your message, or opinions read by those not involved. So it's not always a total waste of time.

Why thank you for that. Sometimes it seems I'm just talking to the walls. But I appreciate your comments and clam logic even in the face of sometimes hysterical confrontations.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by 30564U ↗

Why thank you for that. Sometimes it seems I'm just talking to the walls. But I appreciate your comments and clam logic even in the face of sometimes hysterical confrontations.

Says the guy blocking people!!

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by Mr Poo ↗

Strange situation, really though. Why would the police shoot into the window either way the situation happened? If Lee was driving at the officer, how did he have the clear frame of mind to only use non-lethal rounds if the person was driving at them which is felony attempted assault.

I'd say we will need to see what was the over all scene was. The narrative would lead us to believe we have 1 car, at a gas station, with an army of cops. The army of cops all on this one car, a panicky cop in his army still aggressively needs to pursue by shooting at the car. But ends with no deatail to the probable cause for issuance of a warrant.


So what are the "could haves" of the scene? Could it been a warzone? The gas station under duress, or were they happily operating service un disturbed? Could have (if innocent) this couple been wrapped up in the mess infused around them? (If guilth) could the been trying to plow through the croweds of people in their car, and the cop took an oppositional shot?


So much still to discover.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by 30564U ↗

Why thank you for that. Sometimes it seems I'm just talking to the walls. But I appreciate your comments and clam logic even in the face of sometimes hysterical confrontations.

There are always an average of 100 viewers here. Only a handful of continuous posters. So there are plenty of people taking in what is written

I like everyone's input, and opinion. It stimulates the conversation, and brings a broader perspective for people to consider.