|
#11
●
10-23-2014, 10:31 PM
|
|
Re: Possible Terror Attack in New York City
The more publicity these cowardly attacks get the more it emboldens others to act. My guess is there will be more, they will die for Allah and be a famous warrior. But what can you do, media has to cover it and we all want to know. It just sucks the whole world will know this nuts name, for being a horrible person to us, and for being a hero to them. This kind of shit will never end. There might be 5 this month or it could take 5 years. No matter what we do we can't stop it. The only leader capable of solving this problem is Hitler, he had a knack for extermination. |
|
#12
●
10-23-2014, 10:55 PM
|
|
Re: Possible Terror Attack in New York City
Can't really do that. The Patriot Act doesn't entirely skip the whole due process thing...besides, even if it did, do you really think our pin headed President would allow it? He's so damn limp wristed he wants to Mirandize battlefield POW's and terrorist suspects caught outside of the US.
|
|
#14
●
10-24-2014, 09:31 AM
|
|
Re: Possible Terror Attack in New York City
Still no comments from the supposed 'moderate' moo slums? No? Nothing? Time to do a 2% annual reduction in the number of mosques in the US. Expel 5% of the imams annually as well. The DEATH Cult political ideology masquerading as a 'religion' is hiding behind the US protection of Freedom of Religion. But, there are limits to freedoms. Although there is a substantial degree of Freedom of Speech, one is not legally allowed to yell "Fire!" in a theater or use speech to incite violence. The moo slum DEATH Cult is one big movement to incite violence and should be outlawed. Cannibal Cults are not allowed to practice their phoney 'religion' in the US and moo slums, who do far more damage, shouldn't be allowed to either. Again, nothing from the supposedly 'moderate' moo slums. Certainly, nothing from CAIR (Council on American–Islamic Relations). |
|
#17
●
10-25-2014, 02:34 PM
|
|
Re: Possible Terror Attack in New York City
Think of it in terms of concentric circles: in the center you have radical Islamists like ISIS; then in the circle beyond that, you have conservative Islamists who sympathize with ISIS and their cause, but choose to adopt other methods (such as changing institutions and governments through less violent means and contributing financial and material support to extremist organizations); then beyond that second circle lies conservative Muslims, who believe in things such as death sentences for apostasy and who give to charities not really caring whether or not their money falls into extremist hands; and then the outermost circle is where you find your moderate Muslims, who don't take the faith or interpretation of the Koran as seriously or literally as members of the previous three inner circles. The problem with Islam becomes evident when you realize that the values held by the first three inner circles -- death for apostasy, the oppression of women, the persecution of homosexuals, the institutional implementation of Shari'a Law, honor killings, et cetera -- are essentially the same across all three. While it is indeed a minority that acts upon such things, it is a far greater number that sympathizes with said minority than organizations like CAIR and criers of "Islamophobia" would have us believe. Only those who can be grouped into the outermost ring -- the moderate Muslims -- fully oppose such acts and ideologies, and it is at great risk to themselves that they speak out publicly against such things. Even if you estimate the three innermost rings of the above model to constitute a very conservative number of perhaps 20% of the worldwide Muslim population, you'll still arrive at a considerable and troublingly number given that it's 20% of a religion that accurately claims 1.5 billion followers throughout the world. So really, how wildly "stereotypical" can one consider such violent representatives of the Muslim faith if indeed the percentages I've listed above are truly accurate assessments? |
|
#18
●
10-25-2014, 04:49 PM
|
|
Re: Possible Terror Attack in New York City
The supposed 'moderate' moo slums are happy to sit on the side lines with silent support for the 'radical' moo slums. After all, if their team wins, they might get some goodies out of it. It was the same in Nazi Germany. The supposed 'good' Germans were happy to see Hitler invade other countries and bringing Germany influence, prestige and wealth. As long as things were going well for Germany that is. When Germany lost, they all sang quite a different tune. |
|
#19
●
10-25-2014, 06:17 PM
|
|
Re: Possible Terror Attack in New York City
for all muslims that allow the extremist to do as they wish, u support them.. u also support hate, along with the destruction of ur own from the outside in..... so... enjoy! were comming
|