[Broadjumper]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/08/18/politi...use/index.html

[TheVrist]

“Ethno-nationalism — it’s losers. It’s a fringe element,” Bannon told the magazine. “I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, eh, help crush it more.”

“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.

Steve Bannon.


You liberal CNN drones and lack of objective thinking abilities are what's really wrong with America.

[Broadjumper]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Steve Bannon.


You liberal CNN drones and lack of objective thinking abilities are what's really wrong with America.

Cry harder Mein Herr...

[Kanda444]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Steve Bannon.


You liberal CNN drones and lack of objective thinking abilities are what's really wrong with America.

you know what i love about Breitbart? they way they call everybody 'fake news' yet they still post Associated Press stories.

ffs, even the 'fake news' people still listen to only one source...the AP Wire Service:

AP Wire Services is a division of The Associated Press that provides news and information to Web sites, wireless operators, corporate and government desktops, information distributors and other commercial and new media applications.

once the fake news crowd sells their TV like i did and start using some nuance in their arguments (the media isnt 'fake'...it sells sensationalism, thus, they will doll up any story to look like a sensationalistic 'whore' if they think it will sell), they would have a stronger argument. yelling 'fake news' and pretending like CNN, Fox and Breitbart dont all use the same wire service...well, that's silly.

even when Breitbart called the AP out on exaggerating shit, they failed to point out the news outlets that have been hit with that exact affliction in the past:

In a separate interview with WOUB, the university’s public broadcasting service, Ailes remarked that 50 years ago, the AP was a “neutral” news source that has now shifted into some non-neutral gear.

In that chat, Ailes also let slip some proprietary data about the wire service’s business with Fox News and related properties: “It’s funny — I’m in a negotiation with AP now for about $24 million, which is what News Corp., that I work for, pays them to give us sort of non-neutral news.”

(source 1 and 2)

sorry (not really) but i think its hilarious when people go 'such fake news' about an AP source, then they go to another AP Wire Service customer for news.

[Kanda444]

go to the link i posted for the AP articles on Breitbart, pick one...then google just the headline and see how many other news outlets posted the exact same article verbatim.

watch:

Soothing the nation? Trump struggles like no other president

sites with same article verbatim:

Brietbart
Idaho Statesman
SFGate
FollowNews
FoxNews23

the list goes on and on and on.....most local news sites will likely have this on their AP Wire section. that's how most news works. The AP sends something over the wire and all the news outlets give their own summary of the same story.

[vontrips61]

We win at end

[lesslis2015]

Originally Posted by Kanda444 ↗

go to the link i posted for the AP articles on Breitbart, pick one...then google just the headline and see how many other news outlets posted the exact same article verbatim.

watch:

Soothing the nation? Trump struggles like no other president

sites with same article verbatim:

Brietbart
Idaho Statesman
SFGate
FollowNews
FoxNews23

the list goes on and on and on.....most local news sites will likely have this on their AP Wire section. that's how most news works. The AP sends something over the wire and all the news outlets give their own summary of the same story.

Agree Kanda, but people can watch it live and in color and still come away with a completely different interpretation. Very odd.

[Broadjumper]

Originally Posted by vontrips61 ↗

We win at end

Yeah...just let Trump know when the end is coming so he can prepare to get the fuck out...

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by Kanda444 ↗

go to the link i posted for the AP articles on Breitbart, pick one...then google just the headline and see how many other news outlets posted the exact same article verbatim.

watch:

Soothing the nation? Trump struggles like no other president

sites with same article verbatim:

Brietbart
Idaho Statesman
SFGate
FollowNews
FoxNews23

the list goes on and on and on.....most local news sites will likely have this on their AP Wire section. that's how most news works. The AP sends something over the wire and all the news outlets give their own summary of the same story.

I'm not sure why you felt compelled to preach to the choir. I've been one of the most vocal on these forums as well as politics at naming MSM in general as a dangerous culprit in social public opinion forming matters.

I don't bother with any sources, including AP-products since they themselves have been too far down the bullshit meter creating false narratives based on bias opinions.

Not all things come directly from AP, either-a lot of hard news stories?, sure. Granny high on meth eating the face off her Pomeranian, level stories? No doubt, all news outlets will absorb it from AP if they have an open source policy with them. Generally the verbatim headlines are actually direct from AP, because AP is using the platform to send news to all general readers, and not a particular audience. AP makes their profits through private organizations such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc so that they can keep their non-profit organization status and not sell the product themselves.

"Investigative (insert non AP employee) reporter has a unnamed source" doesn't necessarily cross the AP threshold. Then you have pundits and op-ed level political analyst and opinionated vloggers on highend platforms that could take a basic AP news report and twist it into however best fits the audience's preferred position-


Sensationalism is a thing of the past. It was relevant when you had over 50 groups fighting over advertising airtime- but today, a good number of companies and advertisers have their shareholders that are also shareholders of the piss-poor networks. Many companies get huge cuts in airtime if they allow the networks used their own advertising firms- which is when they push their level of social justice agendas into advertisement- You know, like poor helpless illegal aliens travelling day and night without food and water to start a new life at a lumber company in Texas- (super bowl)

All news outlets are owned by 6 conglomerates whom themselves control other sources of revenue producing venues. Time Warner owns CNN which has lower ratings than nick at night, but still runs strong because it isn't clicks and watches they really need, because you could flip the channel and get their propagated opinion from an advertising firm selling beer, or a morning talk show full of gossiping women, or even a cooking show talking politics while buttering yams.

Briebart in my opinion is no better than the super power networks. However, I tend to call a spade a spade, and know that the propagated bullshit against the outlet is more than false. Calling the group Nazis, white supremacist, et al, is nothing but a logical fallacy on a national social justice scale. The outlet is predominately owned and operated by pro-Israel Jews, hardly a breeding ground for literal Nazis, or "white supremacist" for that matter. Godwin's law at its finest-

That alone stems from Milo Yiannopoulos attempting to be objective in a op-ed on "defining the alt-right" and Milo himself, being highly critical of social justice warriors and radical militant feminist, was promptly labeled "The leader of the alt-right, a white supremacist Nazi movement" which is a farce, considering Milo is a gay jew, that loves big black dick. But alas! anyone on the sociopolitical level of even Milo, was dubbed an "alt right" and the "alt right" alone was falsely dubbed as an Neo-Nazi, white supremacist movement, because "fake news" pushed that narrative based on a small fringe of literal Nazi wannabes calling themselves alt-right. But if anyone took the time to actually scour real Neo-Nazi, white supremacist discussions, or seen them on twitter you'd soon discover they disavow the alt-right because they deem it to be a jewish controlled opposition movement against them.

But is that to say there still isn't WS/NeoNazis following alt-right rallies? A critical thinker would take the time to acknowledge to themselves that having a fringe group in any pocket is par for the course. Progressive have their own fringe group of openly supportive anarchist commies- that shows up at women's marches, gay-pride parades, BLM demonstrations, does this make every democrat voter a commie?

The alt-right isn't even a movement, but a mere political statement that has no base organization. The term was NOT created by Richard Spencer, but hijacked. The real theorist behind the alt-right is by a paleoconservative jew, Paul Gottfried, whom Steve Bannon regards as a brilliant man, and is why he said that Briebart would be welcoming as a platform for the dissenter right, that is not only an opposition to liberalism, but establishment conservatism as well.

So yeah- a lot of "fake news" is developed by vlogger opinions, op-eds, pundits, and false sources stories- all hidden behind de facto news titles- Hardly for sensationalism, more so for opinion shaping of the viewers.

Then when you have Huffingpuffingpost create hit rags like this,based on factually wrong news-
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/08/1...ne-for-bannon/

All they do is blow more into the flames that has those "hate groups" angry- and they're fucking it up for many people whom don't think like them.

[Kanda444]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

I'm not sure why you felt compelled to preach to the choir. I've been one of the most vocal on these forums as well as politics at naming MSM in general as a dangerous culprit in social public opinion forming matters.

I don't bother with any sources, including AP-products since they themselves have been too far down the bullshit meter creating false narratives based on bias opinions.

Not all things come directly from AP, either-a lot of hard news stories?, sure. Granny high on meth eating the face off her Pomeranian, level stories? No doubt, all news outlets will absorb it from AP if they have an open source policy with them. Generally the verbatim headlines are actually direct from AP, because AP is using the platform to send news to all general readers, and not a particular audience. AP makes their profits through private organizations such as CNN, FOX, MSNBC, etc so that they can keep their non-profit organization status and not sell the product themselves.

"Investigative (insert non AP employee) reporter has a unnamed source" doesn't necessarily cross the AP threshold. Then you have pundits and op-ed level political analyst and opinionated vloggers on highend platforms that could take a basic AP news report and twist it into however best fits the audience's preferred position-


Sensationalism is a thing of the past. It was relevant when you had over 50 groups fighting over advertising airtime- but today, a good number of companies and advertisers have their shareholders that are also shareholders of the piss-poor networks. Many companies get huge cuts in airtime if they allow the networks used their own advertising firms- which is when they push their level of social justice agendas into advertisement- You know, like poor helpless illegal aliens travelling day and night without food and water to start a new life at a lumber company in Texas- (super bowl)

All news outlets are owned by 6 conglomerates whom themselves control other sources of revenue producing venues. Time Warner owns CNN which has lower ratings than nick at night, but still runs strong because it isn't clicks and watches they really need, because you could flip the channel and get their propagated opinion from an advertising firm selling beer, or a morning talk show full of gossiping women, or even a cooking show talking politics while buttering yams.

Briebart in my opinion is no better than the super power networks. However, I tend to call a spade a spade, and know that the propagated bullshit against the outlet is more than false. Calling the group Nazis, white supremacist, et al, is nothing but a logical fallacy on a national social justice scale. The outlet is predominately owned and operated by pro-Israel Jews, hardly a breeding ground for literal Nazis, or "white supremacist" for that matter. Godwin's law at its finest-

That alone stems from Milo Yiannopoulos attempting to be objective in a op-ed on "defining the alt-right" and Milo himself, being highly critical of social justice warriors and radical militant feminist, was promptly labeled "The leader of the alt-right, a white supremacist Nazi movement" which is a farce, considering Milo is a gay jew, that loves big black dick. But alas! anyone on the sociopolitical level of even Milo, was dubbed an "alt right" and the "alt right" alone was falsely dubbed as an Neo-Nazi, white supremacist movement, because "fake news" pushed that narrative based on a small fringe of literal Nazi wannabes calling themselves alt-right. But if anyone took the time to actually scour real Neo-Nazi, white supremacist discussions, or seen them on twitter you'd soon discover they disavow the alt-right because they deem it to be a jewish controlled opposition movement against them.

But is that to say there still isn't WS/NeoNazis following alt-right rallies? A critical thinker would take the time to acknowledge to themselves that having a fringe group in any pocket is par for the course. Progressive have their own fringe group of openly supportive anarchist commies- that shows up at women's marches, gay-pride parades, BLM demonstrations, does this make every democrat voter a commie?

The alt-right isn't even a movement, but a mere political statement that has no base organization. The term was NOT created by Richard Spencer, but hijacked. The real theorist behind the alt-right is by a paleoconservative jew, Paul Gottfried, whom Steve Bannon regards as a brilliant man, and is why he said that Briebart would be welcoming as a platform for the dissenter right, that is not only an opposition to liberalism, but establishment conservatism as well.

So yeah- a lot of "fake news" is developed by vlogger opinions, op-eds, pundits, and false sources stories- all hidden behind de facto news titles- Hardly for sensationalism, more so for opinion shaping of the viewers.

Then when you have Huffingpuffingpost create hit rags like this,based on factually wrong news-
http://amp.dailycaller.com/2017/08/1...ne-for-bannon/

All they do is blow more into the flames that has those "hate groups" angry- and they're fucking it up for many people whom don't think like them.

because i thought you would like to laugh at the 'its all fake news....except my source' people with me.