|
#12
●
04-16-2012, 03:04 AM
|
|
Re: Windsor Tower Burns Down. Madrid, Spain. (12 Feb 2005)
Dude I can not fucking believe that was walked right into. I knew your reply even before I had a chance to scroll past. Forums are a discussion board, as in you post.....it stays. |
|
#15
●
04-16-2012, 04:13 AM
|
|
Re: Windsor Tower Burns Down. Madrid, Spain. (12 Feb 2005)
I hate it when people try to prove their intellectual prowess, all he had to do was put his fucking argument across as to why he thought Bill was wrong but oh nooooooooozzzz he has come across all fucking arrogant. |
|
#16
●
04-16-2012, 01:26 PM
|
|
Re: Windsor Tower Burns Down. Madrid, Spain. (12 Feb 2005)
Actually I don't mind. Cause it's that arrogance that made him post something in direct conflict with what he's previously posted on the subject. Kinda the point I took from this thread.
|
|
#18
●
04-16-2012, 09:03 PM
|
|
Re: Windsor Tower Burns Down. Madrid, Spain. (12 Feb 2005)
Thanks for the deffinition explanation John. Now, could you explain to me how the building you posted is like the Soloman Tower, or WTC # 7 ? Or could you explain to me how the one I posted is not like the Soloman Tower, or WTC # 7 ? You are partialy correct, the entire tower did not collapse. It had a reinforced concrete core, except the top 6 floors. Those top 6 floors did not have the reinforced concrete core, and did collapse. Kind of how neither WTC tower had a reinforced concrete core, and they collapsed. I am somewhat paitent, so take your time. |