|
#26
●
04-11-2012, 08:01 AM
| ||||||||
 Madonna vergine bugiarda. Poster Rank:437 Male Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 2,612 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 11 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Commits Suicide Under Train, India
I dunno how you prove that, but it's probably right. The immediate impact would give you enough concussion to not suffer those few seconds it takes to lose consciousness, and the chances of ending up in a wheelchair are pretty slim!
|
|
#28
●
04-11-2012, 02:58 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:148 Male Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 11,125 Mentioned: 6 Post(s) Quoted: 205 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Commits Suicide Under Train, India
it fascinates me that someone seemed to stand and film all this, with the zooming and shit. Wierd, at least over here people don't just film people on the station   |
|
#29
●
04-11-2012, 04:23 PM
| ||||||||
 ★ Server Supporter ★ Poster Rank:436 Male Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2,615
Contributions: 119
Mentioned: 7 Post(s) Quoted: 155 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Woman Commits Suicide Under Train, India
You are right - At first I thought it was a surveillance camera, and it possibly is. But even if it could be remotely zoomed, it should not have these handheld-like movements. On the other hand: The viewing direction is totally fixed. A human handholding the camera and filming the woman (and why should he?), would follow her, especially when she jumps. But the position is fixed - she jumps out in the right edge of the image, instead of being kept in the center. So I still guess, it's a remotely operated camera in a somewhat unstable mount. The operator zooms in on the lone woman on the platform, finds nothing unusual and let it be - and then she jumps. But it's just guesswork  |
