[minka1]

Originally Posted by df2112 ↗

Who cares who took pictures? Is it different over there? Here in the states I’m fairly sure that would be completely legal, “disrespectful” at worst.

Didn’t a fireman get fired after taking Pix of a dead woman in a vehicle accident and then sharing it? Also I think California just signed it into law or something, being a crime to take footage of dead people. Specifically due to pictures taken of the victims in Kobe Bryant plane crash.
Though it makes no sense.
Bystanders or even the victims themselves taking video of them being murdered by cops and whoever else. Even those people who livestream their own auto crashes that end up with people killed...
Or suicides live-streamed.

[df2112]

Originally Posted by Lindemann ↗

I don't think so... For example, In USA and Europe there are yearly hundreds (if not thousands) of gruesome deaths by car accidents, but most of the gory content you find in the web come from a certain number of third world countries.
We all know cases in our towns of someone who was run over by a train, a truck, who commited suicide, who was shot in the head, etc... but you mostly find those pictures from Asia, South America etc, not from USA, France, UK, Spain, Canada... I guess the laws and prosecution has something to do with the few number of leakages on those countries.

Yeah, your absolutely right. Much less leaks out of developed countries. I’m still curious as to exactly why.. after some quick research there is “no expectation of post Mortem privacy” in the US, but another user also mentioned new laws might be in the works, especially since the Kobe crash (let’s pray they leak). I guess it comes down to jurisdiction/state? And how do you even begin to track photos like that with technology nowadays. Shit can get sent to millions in a split second.

[gatagato]

According to Italian penal code (art. 593), you face up to 2 years in prison, if you make a video instead of trying to help.
No matter the woman was dead or alive, it is up to every citizen to dial 118 instead of sharing the video on social networks.
They want to punish him for being cold-hearted and 101% unemotional, possibly under the pressure of the relatives of the victim.
Hypocrisy at its Best, I know it darn well.


https://www.brocardi.it/codice-penal...-i/art593.html

[K53]

Sad, what demons infested her mind?

[Splay]

Street photography in Italy is riskier than in some other places. You can't harm the dignity of a stranger in your photograph, and what is more undignified than having your brains falling out in a public square? And Heaven help you if you get a child in the frame under any circumstances.

[Razorhead]

Mother of two. Very sad.

[dilbertlooking]

Splattered like a pizza.

[kelvin92]

Originally Posted by minka1 ↗

Didn’t a fireman get fired after taking Pix of a dead woman in a vehicle accident and then sharing it? Also I think California just signed it into law or something, being a crime to take footage of dead people. Specifically due to pictures taken of the victims in Kobe Bryant plane crash.
Though it makes no sense.
Bystanders or even the victims themselves taking video of them being murdered by cops and whoever else. Even those people who livestream their own auto crashes that end up with people killed...
Or suicides live-streamed.

It's not illegal in the US to film anything in public. You have no expectation of privacy either dead or alive. I doubt California passed any laws regarding filming dead bodies that would be an infringement on freedom of press.

[marble]

The fall took her roughly around 4 seconds- that's probably just about enough time to change your mind... but not much else.

[K53]

Appears her head took a direct hit