|
#24
●
03-30-2010, 03:47 PM
| ||||||||
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:4030 Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 78 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Iraq Sniper 2008
Prove it then. It was a propoganda film put together in the first place. I've seen footage where the solider got right back up after the sniper attack. Prove your sources. |
|
#25
●
04-11-2010, 05:26 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:22377 male Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Iraq Sniper 2008
Russia is Allied with China to rival the North Pacific Treaty Organization (NATO) which means that the usa would be pulling the allied nations of the UK, Canada, Israel, and Austrailia (i appologize if i missed any others); into all out war with probably the entire eastern continent. And of course nuclear warfare is not the smartest way to handle turbulance between nations, especially considering The Soviets have engineered the 'Tsar' bomb with a yield of 52 Mt. This was a scaled down version of a 100 Mt device demanded by Krushchev durring WWII. The bomb was actually the cleanest nuclear weapon ever detonated because the 3rd stage had been replaced with lead instead of U-238 ( which would have given it's 100 MT yield ). and thence reducing the nuclear radiation as lead is a conductor of radiation, turning the dangerous radiation rays into harmless ions which can be absorbed or transformed elsewhere after the electron transfer between the lead and radiation. and one more thing, you ould do more damage by dropping ten 100 killoton bombs than by droping 1 megaton bomb. therfeore: dropping 250 100 killoton bombs rather than your 25 nukes, would do far more damage. size doesnt matter. it's the nuclear fission or fusion that counts. Moral: The USA is not the alphamale country that many of it's citizens see it as, and could be brought to it's knees in the same way people like you believe could bring other countries crashing down. so don't get cocky, nuclear warfare is no joke, neither is warfare for that matter. may the best man win? (this comment has no intention of any insults toward any nationality or race)  |
|
#26
●
04-11-2010, 05:30 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:22377 male Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Iraq Sniper 2008
Russia is Allied with China to rival the North Pacific Treaty Organization (NATO) which means that the usa would be pulling the allied nations of the UK, Canada, Israel, and Austrailia (i appologize if i missed any others); into all out war with probably the entire eastern continent. And of course nuclear warfare is not the smartest way to handle turbulance between nations, especially considering The Soviets have engineered the 'Tsar' bomb with a yield of 52 Mt. This was a scaled down version of a 100 Mt device demanded by Krushchev durring WWII. The bomb was actually the cleanest nuclear weapon ever detonated because the 3rd stage had been replaced with lead instead of U-238 ( which would have given it's 100 MT yield ). and thence reducing the nuclear radiation as lead is a conductor of radiation, turning the dangerous radiation rays into harmless ions which can be absorbed or transformed elsewhere after the electron transfer between the lead and radiation. and one more thing, you ould do more damage by dropping ten 100 killoton bombs than by droping 1 megaton bomb. therfeore: dropping 250 100 killoton bombs rather than your 25 nukes, would do far more damage. size doesnt matter. it's the nuclear fission or fusion that counts. Moral: The USA is not the alphamale country that many of it's citizens see it as, and could be brought to it's knees in the same way people like you believe could bring other countries crashing down. so don't get cocky, nuclear warfare is no joke, neither is warfare for that matter. may the best man win? (this comment has no intention of any insults toward any nationality or race) |
|
#28
●
04-25-2010, 05:32 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:1782 Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 291 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 11 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Iraq Sniper 2008
Let me tell you about Russia. If it wasn't for the USA the Russians would have been defeated by the nazis during WWII. If it wasn't for the USA the Chinese would have been defeated by the Japanese during WWII. Those commies wouldn't have anything if it wasn't for the USA. |
|
#29
●
04-25-2010, 09:41 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:5724 Male Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 42 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Iraq Sniper 2008
And the US Company's espacialy supported by(Rothschild Familie) were financing Hitler. So the US helped Hitler to invade Russia. And then the US "helped" the russians to deffeat Hitler. Its a double win for the US. But today it isn't that easy. Nuclear war is just a stupid solution. U just use this option if u gona lose it all and there is no hope. If u would bomb down whole russian. u would also kill a lot of people in Euro-Contries. The Radiactive Down-Fall would also hit the US. If the water becomes radioactive, there is no Life possible on earth. And by the way, the sniper in the video did a great job. If u see that as a profession. But i hate this killings of people who aren't guilty for this whole bullshit caused by some US company's! The US isn't fighting for freedom... Just for resources, which belongs to Iraq and the People there! Don't take their oil and other usefull resources! |
|
#30
●
04-25-2010, 09:51 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:1782 Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 291 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 11 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Iraq Sniper 2008
Lots of countries did business with Hitler before he turned into a cold blooded killer. The muslims have been allies of the nazis to this day. Look at that little prick leader of Iran? |
