|
#21
●
04-08-2015, 02:55 AM
|
|
Re: Cop Murders 50-year-old Walter Scott for Running
Sometimes the state will charge with the highest offense possible--in this case first degree murder. When you're on a jury, you can only find the defendant guilty or not for the crime they were charged with. And/or a lesser charge, but no higher. IE, if he had been charged with manslaughter the jury can only argue that charge and/or lower. They are just upping their odds of winning is all. (I hope that makes sense.) |
|
#23
●
04-08-2015, 03:06 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2405 Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 187 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 30 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Cop Murders 50-year-old Walter Scott for Running
What a fucking scumbag.. That stupid fucking cop should be the one shot |
|
#24
●
04-08-2015, 03:27 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:7914 Join Date: Dec 2012 Posts: 23 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 7 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Cop Murders 50-year-old Walter Scott for Running
Lets see how well you record when you happen to stumble upon a murder in progress by a cop.... not to mention trying to do it over a fence........ I thought it was quite commendable that he did not freak out and continued to record. Not a damn movie studio dumb fuck... stupid comment |
|
#28
●
04-08-2015, 03:42 AM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:174 Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 8,808 Mentioned: 30 Post(s) Quoted: 5360 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Cop Murders 50-year-old Walter Scott for Running
so would I; the cameraman had balls to record it |
|
#29
●
04-08-2015, 03:51 AM
|
|
Re: Cop Murders 50-year-old Walter Scott for Running
Funny that you waited a whole hour to proclaim them silent, especially when that hour happened to be when the vast majority of them were probably asleep.
|