|
#42
●
09-16-2022, 04:24 PM
| ||||||||
 ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:1080 Dude Join Date: Mar 2021 Posts: 610 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 222 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Afghanistan - 3 Taliban Members Tries To Fly Black Hawk
Thanks for giving them these while simultaneously saying we need to ban everything in America. Let's Go Brandon. |
|
#44
●
09-16-2022, 09:19 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1446 Male Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 400 Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Quoted: 279 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Afghanistan - 3 Taliban Members Tries To Fly Black Hawk
*previous administration *the Iraqis for surrendering |
|
#46
●
09-16-2022, 10:38 PM
| ||||||||
 ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:71 Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 21,696 Mentioned: 68 Post(s) Quoted: 11367 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Afghanistan - 3 Taliban Members Tries To Fly Black Hawk
This is actually the cheapest way to kill the taliban; 3 million a person? 2 trillion is like 2.000.000.000.000 / 3.000.000 a person. So for the same budget the US could have actually killed 666.667 of these fuckers if they had send in black hawk helicopters and asked 3 persons to board them |
|
#47
●
09-16-2022, 10:42 PM
| ||||||||
| ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:71 Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 21,696 Mentioned: 68 Post(s) Quoted: 11367 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Afghanistan - 3 Taliban Members Tries To Fly Black Hawk
According to the Costs of War Project, the war killed approximately 176,000 people in Afghanistan So the US could have sent 1 single black hawk helicopter (at 10 million a black hawk), have a single person try and fly it and still have had a more cheaper way if killing the army, civilians, and insurgents. All the baby’s and toddlers killed is pretty hard though; I doubt a toddler could take off in the helicopter, let alone a baby  |
|
#48
●
09-16-2022, 10:45 PM
| ||||||||
| ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:71 Join Date: Jul 2008 Posts: 21,696 Mentioned: 68 Post(s) Quoted: 11367 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Afghanistan - 3 Taliban Members Tries To Fly Black Hawk
The coalition forces would still need boots on the ground to kill the baby’s and toddlers probably, but the rest could easily be done by “project black hawk down”. Would go through congress pretty easily;“Buy 1, have they fly 1, and they die 1.” Of course the baby’s are killed in cluster ammunition shelling and through other ordinance, but still, soldiers are cheaper. Make sure they kill themselves back home though, otherwise the costs of dying in service kind of add up  |
