|
#21
●
07-29-2009, 11:22 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: SERGEANT Poster Rank:939 mail Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 779 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 100 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Doctor Chop a Cock
*female circumcision* "OMG OMG HOW EVIL AND BARBARIC AND TOTALLY UNNECESSARY!!!" *male circumcision* "lol nothing wrong with this at all..." Think about it. If male circumcision was that useful, why does only 20% of the world do it? Because it's religious/cultural bullshit, maybe? |
|
#24
●
07-30-2009, 03:20 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:13316 Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 7 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Doctor Chop a Cock
Huge difference in male and female circumcision. In male the outer skin is remove, exposing the glans, male can still feel pleasure and it is done under some kind of anesthia. And usually the male is a day or two old. Female circumcision, the clit is actually DUG out . Usually without any pain meds and against the females wishes when she is about 10 or older. The "g" spot is actually the back of the clit, so despite how hard it is for a guy to find the thing, its actually several inches long and it is, once again, DUG the f out!! Another major difference, male circumcisions were started to help prevent infections. Female circumcisions are done so the woman won't experience pleasure from sex and cheat on her husband or "betray" her family.... Yeah, big difference. Guys don't usually miss that little piece of flesh, but I can tell you that I would TOTALLY miss my little happy button!! |