[Forensicgirl52]

Originally Posted by honeysprite ↗

No matter how over zealous you are and how much we disagree, I believe you mean well but BLINDNESS <> Circumcision


Based on all of those current dates I've changed my mind completely...

If I'm allowed to use opinions and medical information that old I'm going to start giving/using the following medical treatments:

• Soothing Syrup with the active ingredients..."morphin sulphate, chloroform, morphine hydrochloride, codeine, heroin, powdered opium, cannabis indica"
• Mercury for scrapes, bruises or constipation
• Heroin for cough suppression
• Bloodletting when he's not feeling well

I used the clearly outdated and uneducated information provided by WHO and AAP (what would they know right?! ) and real people to make my decision which is done and I'd do it again.

As I stated before: So, I'm calling the game and moving on.

Medical circumcision became popular to prevent masturbation by reducing both ease and pleasure. I proved it using historical quotes, since the original idea arose during the past. The excuses given for circumcision in modern times have changed but those are its origins and all the excuses used today to justify it are just as false as the original ones were. You can disagree with me all you like, but the fact remains that I am correct and have given more than enough evidence to prove it.

[Forensicgirl52]

Originally Posted by ChristySD ↗

Those of you who know me on here know I will give my medical opinions, but this one I am not touching (pardon the pun Shaz!). I briefly glanced at the ranting by the OP and got a good chuckle, needless to say. "Mutilation", "barbaric"........I get a good laugh every time I hear propoganda such as this. Infections and gangrene are consequences of a circumcision that is, usually (I use this caveat) not properly cared for. This is so with ANY surgical procedure, minor or major. Do not take a smattering of quotes from different medical groups and form your own opinions, then say it is fact. It is "practicing" medicine. As much as I hold my peers at the WHO and AMA in esteem, they are not always correct, that is why it is called medical OPINION. As always my friends, hope this helps.

Amputating healthy, normal tissue from the genitals of an infant is a violation of medical ethics and IS mutilation by any definition of the word. Maybe you should actually do some research?
Unlike all other surgery performed on infants, circumcision has no therapeutic value or justification and is therefore wrong and medically unethical. What is propaganda is the North American attitude that the foreskin is useless (false-it serves several protective and sexual functions), that it is inherently dangerous (false again, 80% of the world's men are intact and are not being strangled by their foreskins), and that it is dirty (false, you just wash it like any other body part, and women produce way more smegma then men do).
Since infant circumcision is completely unnecessary, any consequences from it are completely avoidable. If doctors actually follow their ethics and don't remove healthy body parts from infants, then there is nothing to get infected or develop gangrene.
God, I hope I never meet a medical professional like you. I'd certainly never let you near any children I have.

[Forensicgirl52]

Originally Posted by ChristySD ↗

One thing I just cannot help myself on.......**hee hee** The website where the OP's link originated from is the "Ataahua Shop". "Ataahua" in Maori means "beautiful". **HEE HEE** Take a look at Maori tatoos. Want to talk about PAIN?!?! Let us start THERE.......... I am such an epic shit stirrer......I love you guys!

Now you're making things up. None of the links I have posted have anything to do with this "Ataahua Shop". You can't even make a coherent argument. Fail.

[TwistedSisterr]

why are you guys arguing with her Cant you see SHE KNOWS EVERYTHING and no matter what you say YOUR wrong because THAT "activist" is arrogant and presumptuous....

[DonB]

I agree, TwistedSisterr. I am no longer engaging her. She is too far gone, and will ride her hobby horse until it keels over dead. She probably signs up at any forum she can find, just to start threads condemning male circumcision. HondaOwnersTalk.com, watch out; you're next.

[Tomoyoshi]

Just leave the foreskin alone. It's like a hoodie for the turtle head.

[Stilkickin']

Nice pics, poor dicks!!!

[Urge2KilCntFulfil]

Why the fuck are these dumb fucks who don't even have dicks arguing this shit? If you don't got a cock then STFU. You say "Americans" Bitch we can take care of ourselves. you think if we fight back against taxes, racism, sexism, poverty, ect. ect. that we wouldn't stand up for are penises if we had a problem with it? Hell our penises stand up all by themselves FFS! We like not pissing all over the end of are dicks when we urinate, and them not smelling like the stinky pussies we fuck, and not getting infected. If you like having stinky urine covered dicks shoved up your vag that's your own business but you don't need to try and pass conjecture as fact. Take your urine covered, infection prone foreskin covered penis heads, and your penis envy and choke on that shit. REPLY IF YOU WANT BUT MY OPINION IS MORE VALID THEN YOURS, WHY YOU ASK? BECAUSE I ACTUALLY HAVE A PENIS. and you don't!

[PTSD Is My Life]

I happy to have the full skin intact....for those who say its less hygenic just havent heard of washing! I have been in filth for long periods of times and its easier to look after your foreskinned cock than your feet as you can clean your cock with anything from water to warm tea or coffee, trust me i know!
Tea is actually mildly antiseptic and the stewed leaves are put behind the foreskin in certain cultures to aid the healing of cuts, abrasions and even ulcers (hot countries where tea grow naturally)

[shadowstein]

i felt real gay for looking at the whole thing