[Pit Bull]

Originally Posted by Oswald2001 ↗

And this coming from someone that defends subjecting the population - including children - to the predation of known dangerous unstable vicious essentially wild animals.

Typical hater response for an ignorant asshole that doesn't understand the difference between domestic and wild. Pit bulls are dogs dumb ass. Nothing more nothing less. Just fucking dogs.

[Pit Bull]

This is from the CDC Kellyhound, what they say about the studt you posted.....A CDC study on fatal dog bites lists the breeds involved in fatal attacks over 20 years (Breeds of dogs involved in fatal human attacks in the United States between 1979 and 1998 Adobe PDF file). It does not identify specific breeds that are most likely to bite or kill, and thus is not appropriate for policy-making decisions related to the topic. Each year, 4.7 million Americans are bitten by dogs. These bites result in approximately 16 fatalities; about 0.0002 percent of the total number of people bitten. These relatively few fatalities offer the only available information about breeds involved in dog bites. There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill.

Many practical alternatives to breed-specific policies exist and hold promise for preventing dog bites. For prevention ideas and model policies for control of dangerous dogs, please see the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) Task Force on Canine Aggression and Human-

[Pit Bull]

Here's the link......http://www.cdc.gov/homeandrecreation...factsheet.html

[Oswald2001]

Originally Posted by Pit Bull ↗

Typical hater response for an ignorant asshole that doesn't understand the difference between domestic and wild. Pit bulls are dogs dumb ass. Nothing more nothing less. Just fucking dogs.

Typical dishonest response from someone that forces others into danger of a mauling, but somehow expects not to be held accountable when his own BS is exposed.

If what you say is true (It's not true, of course.), then why would you mind being held responsible? I mean...supposedly...there's no problem. That's what you claim. Right?

If the monster dog is truly safe, then you would have no worry.

You object because you know that you are lying and that you put others in danger and don't want to be held accountable.

This is typical of pitbull owners.

If your dog mauls...you...personally...should be mauled.

[Pit Bull]

I don't mind being held responsible dickweed. Just like a boat operator is responsible for his wake. I'm responsible for the actions of my dog what the fuck ever she/he does. That goes for every goddamn cocksucker on the planet that owns a dog, irregardless of breed ,you anal pus trap.
I'm not worried a bit about my dogs. They have been socialized with both humans and other animals since puppy hood and are members of my family not discarded in the fucking yard like used lawn furniture. I'd trust them way before I'd trust a dog hating bastard like you....
I don't want to to be held more responsible than any other fucking dog owner. Whats good for me is good for you.....
I think you personally should put a pistol in your mouth and pull the trigger.....today. You're wasting my air little man.

[Oswald2001]

My, you seemed so filled with vitriol and unstable to boot.

No wonder you are fixated on owning dangerous wild animals. Many psychos do.

The more dangerous the animal, the stiffer the penalty should be.

The dangerous combination of having such an unstable animal and such a hate filled unstable owner is just more evidence of why people like you should not be allowed to have vicious wild animals.


Do you have cancer yet? If you don't drop the hatred, you probably will.

[Esamorenasexi]

i've been bitten by three different golden retrievers, never a pit bull. so. . . if it's a breed thing, it's not just pits. i want to say i've been bitten by chihuahuas, but they never seem to break the skin, so i don't count that.

[johnleeknoefler]

Originally Posted by kellyhound ↗

some stats

Obviously Pitbulls are the most dangerous. Rotties come in second but almost as dangerous. Makes no never mind. Owners should be held liable for the actions of their "pets".

[Oswald2001]

If a house burns down because of an electrical fire due to unforseen circumstances, that is one thing.

If a house burns down because someone irresponsibly and insanely stored 1,200 gallons of gasoline next to an electric space heater, that is something else entirely.

If the pitbull liars really believed their own BS, they would have no problem being mauled by a strange dog if their own dog mauled someone as a penalty...because...there would be no penalty since their little 'angel' dogs would 'never' bite anyone. Right?

So, if they really believed what they spew, there would be no risk for them.

The trouble is, they want to put others at risk, evade responsibility and go on in blissful denial.

[johnleeknoefler]

Originally Posted by Oswald2001 ↗

If a house burns down because of an electrical fire due to unforseen circumstances, that is one thing.

If a house burns down because someone irresponsibly and insanely stored 1,200 gallons of gasoline next to an electric space heater, that is something else entirely.

If the pitbull liars really believed their own BS, they would have no problem being mauled by a strange dog if their own dog mauled someone as a penalty...because...there would be no penalty since their little 'angel' dogs would 'never' bite anyone. Right?

So, if they really believed what they spew, there would be no risk for them.

The trouble is, they want to put others at risk, evade responsibility and go on in blissful denial.