|
#8
●
04-13-2010, 11:02 AM
|
|
Re: Found the Remains of a Man, Only Legs and Boots
I'm not really getting how people are coming to the conclusion that the bones are "short" when there is nothing in the pic to do a size comparison against. For all we know those shoes could be a whopping size 16 clod-hopper, and the length of the bones is fitting in relation to that size. The bones may or may not be "short", but unless something (that we know the size of) is put beside them how do you decide what is "short"? |
|
#10
●
04-13-2010, 04:18 PM
|
|
Re: Found the Remains of a Man, Only Legs and Boots
all these year's i've been led to believe the ditty, the femur's connected to the knee bone, the knee bone's connected to the thigh bone, and so on, no thank's for the correction you little rogue you, i was trying to sound cool, but you showed me to be a fool, thank's |