[NaTaS]

I think is legit, nice photos.

[coco-noptik]

thats fake or???

[The Driver]

the grass is not flat around the FAKE body. animals would make a big flat area where they drag the carcass around and get down on it

[Kapitan517]

Not a bad fake, but still. The skin colour and texture is way too healthy and unmarred. The remaining eyeball is just too much, right out of a "house of horrors"-mannequin setup. And that breast ... no way.

[Oswald2001]

I think it's probably a fake.

But, a really good one.

[johnleeknoefler]

Photoshopped. But fairly good work.

[johnleeknoefler]

Originally Posted by The Driver ↗

the grass is not flat around the FAKE body. animals would make a big flat area where they drag the carcass around and get down on it

That's a good point also. I noticed that with all the vegetation around none is on the wounds. And the severed arm does not match up with the stump. There is some upper arm on the severed part as well as the elbow and part of the fore arm is on the stump. And the rib cage is out of position. Also there are no blood smears on the intact skin. Still cool to see.

[Pyramid_Head]

I don't know exactly why, but this looks fake.

[greg771]

If it's fake, it's not 'good work'.....

[hunnie_20]

photoshopped.