[Spucky33]

Of the vast array of characters surrounding the assassination of President Kennedy, few are more mysterious and enigmatic than David William Ferrie of New Orleans. Before and after the assassination, Ferrie's life is full of mystery, strange activity, and puzzling behavior. Cuban exiles christened him the "master of intrigue." Jim Garrison, New Orleans D.A. during the sixties, called him a key figure in the assassination of the president and "one of history's most important individuals."

At the time of the assassination Ferrie was a forty-five year old New Orleans resident who was acquainted with some of the most notorious names linked to the assassination: Lee Oswald, Clay Shaw, Guy Banister, Jack Ruby, and Carlos Marcello. He possessed assorted talents and eccentricities. He was a pilot, and at one time a senior pilot with Eastern Airlines until he was fired for homosexual activity on the job. He was also a hypnotist, a serious researcher of the origins of cancer, amateur psychologist, and a victim of a strange disease, alopecia, which made all of his body void of hair. Anti-Castro, anti-Kennedy, and anti-Communist, Ferrie was also a bishop of the Orthodox Old Catholic Church of North America. His odd lifestyle was embellished with an equally bizarre appearance featuring a red toupee and false eyebrows. Investigator and author Harrison Livingstone met Ferrie and remembered him as "an intense and sinister, cynical, disgusting, disheveled individual who was excited at the prospect of preying upon the vulnerable, the helpless, and the innocent."

[The2Halves]

Nice read with pics man!

[Faline]

Lovely post

[Spucky33]

[nomedia="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJMZ-MEIcAI"]YouTube- DAVID FERRIE.wmv[/nomedia]

[IRISH.]

Never heard of the guy!
Interesting story!

[butterfly]

Nice post and info

[Spucky33]

Ferrie's suicide notes:

To leave this life is, for me, a sweet prospect. I find nothing in it that is desirable, and on the other hand everything that is loathsome.
Daily we are propagandized more and more about a rising crime rate. But how do we know it is true? We don't, for we Americans have little or no access to the truth. Today I went to the police headquarters to see these "public records" of this rising crime rate and nearly wound up in jail for my trouble. I was searched, interrogated, verbally abused, had my record checked, and finally threatened. Needless to say, I did not see the "public records."
Still more irking is to hear a superintendent of police, who rose through the ranks (thus proving that zero equals super zero) stating that the solution to the crime problem was tightened and more stringent laws. A somewhat messianic district attorney concurred. Together these men prove themselves utterly unfit for office, just as they proved that an electorate cannot be depended on to pick the right man. The problems of crime rest deep in society. The problems exist in the existence of divorce and the absence of regulations.
No parents would send him [sic] child to an amateur for dental work, nor a quack for an appendectomy. Yet what atrocious negligence is permitting other amateurs to raise children. Mere kids are allowed to marry because they have the "urge". How stupid can you get? Every expert tells in detail how children must be cared for physically, emotionally and intellectually. Yet society lets girls and boys, not yet capable of lover [sic] begat [sic] children who, love-starved, turn to crime for some sort of identification. However, I don't think we will often see a district attorney or a police chief with brains to realize this.
We pay so much attention to the law. I have not figured out the reason. I have watched judges like Cocke at work. The various police and district attorneys and the like get to bend the judge's ear long before the trial. These judges of today deny defendants due process of the law. They permit the court to try the case in chambers, to have district attorneys form their opinions and decisions long before the defense gets a chance. Further, these same judges (and I am afraid it pertains to nearly all of them) then comment, by word, glance, gesture or remark, on the evidence in front of a jury. If the defendant wins, these judges take it as a personal insult.
When I was a boy my father preached that in the "American way of life" you are innocent till proven guilty. No greater lie has been told. The man charged before the court has flat got to prove his innocence. Go witness a criminal trial and watch. The state is supposed to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. If you read decisions of the various courts of appeal and the Supreme Court you discover that truth and falsehood, right and wrong have no place in court. All the state needs is "evidence to support a conviction". If this is justice, then justice be damned.


Dear Al:
When you read this I will be quite dead and no answer will be possible. I wonder how you are going to justify things.
Tell me you treated me as you did because I was the one who always got you in trouble. The police arrest. The strip car charge. The deal at Kohn School. Flying Barragona in the Beech.
Well, I guess that helps ease your conscience, even if it is not the truth. All I can say is that I offered you love, and the best I could. All I got in return in the end was a kick in the teeth. Thus I die alone and unloved.
You would not even straighten out Carol about me, though this started when you were going steady.
I wonder what your last days and hours are going to be like. As you sowed, so shall you reap.

[JOJOJIN]

Looks like Quentin Tarantino in the morning :laug

[FavaBeans]

Great info and awesome old pix!

[methos666]

Interesting post...for further reading, I'd suggest the following site:

http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100menu.html

While many people view Oliver Stone's JFK as something of a documentary presenting facts...this site does a VERY good job of explaining the truth about the many inaccuracies in Stone's movie.

I, for one, find it hilarious that JFK is sainted for no other reason than having his head blown off. Look at what the man truly accomplished and actually did and you'll find he really was nothing more than a career politician who generally made poor decisions. Style over substance indeed.

As for the mystery of who killed JFK...I figured that out long ago...

It was Jackie O!! Look at the film...she leans close to him and his head goes BOOM. She shot him!!!

Why would she do such a thing? FOR MONEY, of course!!!

After inheriting his millions she found a stupid old Greek dude to be her next Sugar Daddy and walked away with his fortune, too.

Jackie O gets celebrated for doing the same thing Anna Nicole Smith did.

Lesson learned, kiddies...It's all about perspective. :-)