#21
| |
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
Quote:
Obviously it is difficult for us to not fall into the trap of anthropocentric thinking, but I will try to explain my thoughts on time without thinking too much "inside of the box". I believe time is fundamental, rather than being a resultant property caused by the existence of space, energy or matter. I believe time is the base state from which everything else naturally results, i.e. time causes space to exist which in turn produces matter and so forth. The anthropocentric angle teaches us two concepts at an early age, and indeed on Earth, these concepts are applicable and undeniable - 1) If we live in an empty cave, it remains empty until something is put into it. 2) If we put an object inside the cave it remains in the same place unless a force acts upon it. These concepts I believe are cornerstones of the idea that the universe had to be created either by a natural phenomenon or by a deliberate action from a creator. However it is also possible that something can naturally exist by default. I believe time is this thing - it exists regardless of any other fact, Why do I think this? Because everything we are familiar with falls under the cause and effect umbrella. Things must be caused. Time though can not be caused, since cause and effect are features of time. They do not exist outside of time. They are merely points plotted onto an existing timeline that says A precedes B, and we make our observations accordingly. These observations are not necessarily purely true e.g. we can say if we heat an object up it will radiate energy, hence the black body radiation principle, but in reality it may be something entirely different that causes objects to glow when they become hot. We can only do repeated experiments and say "this is what happens every time, so it is probably the temperature of an object that makes it emit radiation". We are using the timeline to try and ascertain what the causes and effects are. But without diverging too much from the original point, it then follows (in my eyes) that time can NOT be caused as it is by default uncausable. Nor can time have a beginning or an end as these are also just simply measurements made using an existing timeline. I know there are many arguments that refute my ideas, such as "If time was infinite, then today would never have arrived". I regard that as a weak argument. Today obviously has arrived, so I think instead of denying the results of our experiment, we should test the idea that time IS infinite and today HAS arrived, so let's investigate how that is possible. Furthermore, and to conclude, it also follows that if time is infinite, that every possibility will eventually occur. We are now living in one of those inevitable possibilities. Where did the matter or energy come from to produce our universe ? From nowhere, is my answer. The laws of conservation of mass and energy are really a by-product of this universe, and rather than being laws of authority, they are really just descriptions of our observations - that in experiments they are always true and irrefutable. Can something come from nothing? Absolutely. In fact in infinity, such a thing must eventually occur. So nothing we see around us is miraculous, but was always destined to happen. Going back to the cave analogy I started with, it is only through human observation that we have decided things can not come from nothing - this is definitely the case INSIDE our universe, but no evidence exists to say that this should be the case for what happens outside of, or prior to the universe existing. Therefore I do not believe time is a construct of our perception. It has always existed, and always will, and this universe is a natural product of it. There is no need for a God in any of this. It works perfectly well without someone upstairs waving a magic wand. Thinking along those lines is childish at best, and at worst it is completely fucking retarded. |
The Following User Says Thank You to spycosis For This Useful Post: | ||
Ozymandias |
#22
| ||||||||
My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:33238 Join Date: Jun 2021 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)
| ||||||||
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
You are right, the mask in the first picture is in Chinese.
|
#23
|
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
Needs bigger boobies
|
#24
|
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
And not as much dead
|
#25
|
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
Incredible set, TYSM ![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Sharon For This Useful Post: | ||
Ozymandias |
#26
| ||||||||
My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:12477 Join Date: Dec 2022 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 4 Post(s)
| ||||||||
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
She got a lil piece of poo turtle-necking its way out.
|
#27
|
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
Op thank you for the post! If you purchased the set you'd think they would include the verdict of the autopsy. Good find though!
|
#28
|
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
The third photo is the actual death test. If you arrive with no pulse, no respirations, and you are room temperature or colder, you could maybe be only mostly dead. Hemostats are used to pinch the eyelids for a full minute. If you don't try to blink, scream or escape, you're completely dead.
|
#29
|
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
First time I have EVER read the phrase "as well as her neatly-shaved pussy" on an autopsy report. That was fantastic! I'm going to see if I can get my autopsy to say "the decedent's gorgeous, ample dick is neatly trimmed."
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CatBatMan For This Useful Post: | ||
Facesofdeath85 |
#30
| ||||||||
My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:20240 Join Date: Apr 2024 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
Re: Blonde Woman in Morgue
She has a pewpy sticking put her bum bum!
|