Race and Intelligence

[peema]

I don't know much about science and statistics, but I live where half of population is black. And I tell you, the way black people conduct themselves makes it very hard for me to form positive opinion of them. I am also very skeptical about asians, go visit the traffic section to see how smart those guys really are.

Love,

Racist Peema

[gore555]

Originally Posted by evilion

I can't believe you believe the leftist lies. There is proof of race everywhere, in plants and animals alike. There is no one race, the human race, because human is a species and species have races. And every race has its good and bad sides.
You can't address a German Shepherd as a Poodle, because the German Shepherd isn't a Poodle, but they are still dogs. The Race isn't determined by the colour of your skin, the colour of the skin is only one attribute belonging to that race. There is also the skull shape, the face structures like lips, ears, nose, chin and so on, the hair structure and colour, eye colour and shape, length, width and the hairiness of the body, and the muscle and brain structure.

For instance, the negroid race is superior in sprinting (because their muscles are made of another material, which is superior for short bursts of energy) and rhythm, or did you see someone sprint faster than someone of negroid race?
The European Descendant aka Indo-Aryan race or caucasian are build stronger and more intelligent , so they were able to produce the biggest and the best kingdoms in the world, dating far back to the sumerians.

The East-Asian Descendant are smarter than all other on avarage level but had far less brilliant people than Indo-Aryans. Thats why most of inventions are made by European Descendant.
Race is not something social or what ever you say it is, it is biological, determined by their genes.
If it would be a social construct then tell me why south africa was a very wealthy colony of the west, only populated by European descendant and rhodesia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesia) was the breadbasket for the entire africa, owned by European descendant farmers and as soon as apartheid ended (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boer and the 2 boer wars) the country has experienced tremendous waves of criminiality and destruction. The necks of many farmers were slit and their family butchered otherwise in Rhodesia region. South Africa has the highest rape rates (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_South_Africa).

Why was Haiti a beautiful place in the hand of the Spanish and when Spain had to retreat from there letting all their slaves loose and giving them the country it became a shithole?
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg688...ng&res=landing)
Even after 2 years of the earthquake they are still in the same condition despite the help of other countries. Japan is already on their feets after those tsunamis hit them and will still be when the next tsunami will come and rebuild quickly. Because of discrimination or social structures? What discrimination is there if the majority of that country belongs to the negroid race?

Why was Detroit a phenomenal Place when the majority of its inhabitants were of European descendant? A place full of industry and productivity, culture and freedom. Now after the majority of the populace of that city became negroid, it became a shithole with gangs fighting everywhere and people have to barricade themselves for the night, just so they can sleep without getting murdered in the night.

Why are people of East-Asian descendant better in math and other school subjects, than people of European descendant? You will probably say something like "It's because of the hard parenting". If you take an East-Asian child at birth away from its parents and let it get parented by negroid parents, the kid will still be one of the top of the class.

Why didn't the European Colonist in Australia encountered a thriving Nation with big cities and other things, which are common now in Australia after its colonisation? Australia is a rich country with a rich amount of flora and fauna, you can't deny that.

Why did the aborigines or negroids never invent the wheel?

I know you will say something like "one of my best friends is black/mulatto/hispanic/arabic/indian/south asian and he is a beautiful and intelligent human being", that is fine to have them as friends and have contact to them. I too know and admire some friends of non-European descendant. But they are an exception. They were taken under the parenting of European descendant, so they could actually do something out of them, because 20% of your IQ is corresponding with your environment. But they still show a lot non-European descendant attributes in their behavior and thinking.

You will probably also come up with some arguments about China and being a second world country despite them being more intelligent on avarage level. The country is in a bad shape because of three major events and of course the difference between the European-Descendant and East-Asians.
First, when the British Empire came to visit and colonize, they encountered a very good working economy system, where everyone could be something and everyone lived not bad. It had to be destabilized with drugs and greed, so they made the opium wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars). British had a big technology advantage, having metal platted ships with steamengine and superior guns, who took out fleets on its own. This act destroyed their superior economy, but the country didn't turn to shit.

(second)Then the leftist Communist came and put people like mao on the top of the state and he then took out millions of people, because they were smart. Just like in Soviet union. Did you know that in Emperial Russia they had everything from wealth, culture to living place for everyone? And during the Comminsts it suddenly had no wealth, not enough livingplaces for its inhabitants and no good were able to be bought, despite the industry running 24/7 . That I know for a fact, because my family lived there.

(third)And now the Capitalist are exploatating the country and bringing it to their knees, forcing to look for ressources on other continents (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/p...se-Africa.html).

And racial difference on the account that they have far less brilliant people, than Europe.

Why is there so much suffering in Africa these days? It is really all European-Descendants fault. Not because the slavery or expluatation, it's because of our International Help Fonds. If you give someone a good amount of money every month, they will automaticly stop working. Why work? They can go around and fuck people, sing and dance, eat and drink and sleep. Their population exploaded because of our help and suddenly there is not enough food for everyone, because their farms, which are not that many or big as farms in first world countries, can't produce enough food, because of lack of knowledge, technology and work ethnics. The african slaves introduced rice to european colonists in the thirteen colonies. (http://www.yale.edu/glc/gullah/index.htm) They never domesticated any animals, africa is full of those. There are sheeps and zebras for instance. Africa is really a ressource rich country.

Now its time to say something about the desert I think, because it will be one of your arguments. The Agyptians, which were of Arabic-Descendant and had also some percentage of European blood, survived and build a prosperous civilisation in the desert. And the desert is only in the north parts of africa. Libya was a prosperous country, where a simple Nurse had a payout of 3-4k$ before NATO came and destroyed everything, even doing Warcrimes to achieve their goal. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=26466) (same is happening to syria and iran btw.)

You can't deny facts just because you feel sorry for someone. This "I feel sorry for a certain group of people, because they are getting descriminated for what they really are or look like" has brought destruction and suffering everywhere.

"Oh noes, that country doesn't follow some human rights, we have to invade it, kill everyone in our way, destroy anything they built, take away culture, economy and politics from them and reinstall democracy and make damn sure those bastards will never break the human rights again by torturing and killing, therefore breaking those human rights."
And when all that happend and all refugees and other immigrants are trying to come to your country, you gladly accept them, because those poor people have no place to live, give them all the support they need with home and money and passport, so they don't have to go back ever again in that god forsaken place.

Appreciate diversity by keeping it diverse.

And now for the last argument I can think of, you will bring, which will be "You are a blind racist...". No, you are. You are with all that politically correct bullshit, not acknowledging all the beautiful race attributes, which the people value greatly in non-western world. Thinking everyone is equal in everything, do you think only "white People" are racists? Every other member of those races actually are and don't really mind to be made fun of because of their asian eyes or curly negroid hair. They too are making fun of our racial attributes.

And the proper term is actually racialist.

Summed up perfectly.

[Vera Wang]

Originally Posted by tannersmith

The Bell Curve
Race Differences In Intelligence
IQ and Global Inequality

3 of the worst books around.

D- (try harder....)

[bob351]

Originally Posted by evilion

I can't believe you believe the leftist lies. There is proof of race everywhere, in plants and animals alike. There is no one race, the human race, because human is a species and species have races. And every race has its good and bad sides.
You can't address a German Shepherd as a Poodle, because the German Shepherd isn't a Poodle, but they are still dogs. The Race isn't determined by the colour of your skin, the colour of the skin is only one attribute belonging to that race. There is also the skull shape, the face structures like lips, ears, nose, chin and so on, the hair structure and colour, eye colour and shape, length, width and the hairiness of the body, and the muscle and brain structure.

For instance, the negroid race is superior in sprinting (because their muscles are made of another material, which is superior for short bursts of energy) and rhythm, or did you see someone sprint faster than someone of negroid race?
The European Descendant aka Indo-Aryan race or caucasian are build stronger and more intelligent , so they were able to produce the biggest and the best kingdoms in the world, dating far back to the sumerians.

The East-Asian Descendant are smarter than all other on avarage level but had far less brilliant people than Indo-Aryans. Thats why most of inventions are made by European Descendant.
Race is not something social or what ever you say it is, it is biological, determined by their genes.
If it would be a social construct then tell me why south africa was a very wealthy colony of the west, only populated by European descendant and rhodesia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesia) was the breadbasket for the entire africa, owned by European descendant farmers and as soon as apartheid ended (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boer and the 2 boer wars) the country has experienced tremendous waves of criminiality and destruction. The necks of many farmers were slit and their family butchered otherwise in Rhodesia region. South Africa has the highest rape rates (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_South_Africa).

Why was Haiti a beautiful place in the hand of the Spanish and when Spain had to retreat from there letting all their slaves loose and giving them the country it became a shithole?
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg688...ng&res=landing)
Even after 2 years of the earthquake they are still in the same condition despite the help of other countries. Japan is already on their feets after those tsunamis hit them and will still be when the next tsunami will come and rebuild quickly. Because of discrimination or social structures? What discrimination is there if the majority of that country belongs to the negroid race?

Why was Detroit a phenomenal Place when the majority of its inhabitants were of European descendant? A place full of industry and productivity, culture and freedom. Now after the majority of the populace of that city became negroid, it became a shithole with gangs fighting everywhere and people have to barricade themselves for the night, just so they can sleep without getting murdered in the night.

Why are people of East-Asian descendant better in math and other school subjects, than people of European descendant? You will probably say something like "It's because of the hard parenting". If you take an East-Asian child at birth away from its parents and let it get parented by negroid parents, the kid will still be one of the top of the class.

Why didn't the European Colonist in Australia encountered a thriving Nation with big cities and other things, which are common now in Australia after its colonisation? Australia is a rich country with a rich amount of flora and fauna, you can't deny that.

Why did the aborigines or negroids never invent the wheel?

I know you will say something like "one of my best friends is black/mulatto/hispanic/arabic/indian/south asian and he is a beautiful and intelligent human being", that is fine to have them as friends and have contact to them. I too know and admire some friends of non-European descendant. But they are an exception. They were taken under the parenting of European descendant, so they could actually do something out of them, because 20% of your IQ is corresponding with your environment. But they still show a lot non-European descendant attributes in their behavior and thinking.

You will probably also come up with some arguments about China and being a second world country despite them being more intelligent on avarage level. The country is in a bad shape because of three major events and of course the difference between the European-Descendant and East-Asians.
First, when the British Empire came to visit and colonize, they encountered a very good working economy system, where everyone could be something and everyone lived not bad. It had to be destabilized with drugs and greed, so they made the opium wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars). British had a big technology advantage, having metal platted ships with steamengine and superior guns, who took out fleets on its own. This act destroyed their superior economy, but the country didn't turn to shit.

(second)Then the leftist Communist came and put people like mao on the top of the state and he then took out millions of people, because they were smart. Just like in Soviet union. Did you know that in Emperial Russia they had everything from wealth, culture to living place for everyone? And during the Comminsts it suddenly had no wealth, not enough livingplaces for its inhabitants and no good were able to be bought, despite the industry running 24/7 . That I know for a fact, because my family lived there.

(third)And now the Capitalist are exploatating the country and bringing it to their knees, forcing to look for ressources on other continents (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/p...se-Africa.html).

And racial difference on the account that they have far less brilliant people, than Europe.

Why is there so much suffering in Africa these days? It is really all European-Descendants fault. Not because the slavery or expluatation, it's because of our International Help Fonds. If you give someone a good amount of money every month, they will automaticly stop working. Why work? They can go around and fuck people, sing and dance, eat and drink and sleep. Their population exploaded because of our help and suddenly there is not enough food for everyone, because their farms, which are not that many or big as farms in first world countries, can't produce enough food, because of lack of knowledge, technology and work ethnics. The african slaves introduced rice to european colonists in the thirteen colonies. (http://www.yale.edu/glc/gullah/index.htm) They never domesticated any animals, africa is full of those. There are sheeps and zebras for instance. Africa is really a ressource rich country.

Now its time to say something about the desert I think, because it will be one of your arguments. The Agyptians, which were of Arabic-Descendant and had also some percentage of European blood, survived and build a prosperous civilisation in the desert. And the desert is only in the north parts of africa. Libya was a prosperous country, where a simple Nurse had a payout of 3-4k$ before NATO came and destroyed everything, even doing Warcrimes to achieve their goal. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=26466) (same is happening to syria and iran btw.)

You can't deny facts just because you feel sorry for someone. This "I feel sorry for a certain group of people, because they are getting descriminated for what they really are or look like" has brought destruction and suffering everywhere.

"Oh noes, that country doesn't follow some human rights, we have to invade it, kill everyone in our way, destroy anything they built, take away culture, economy and politics from them and reinstall democracy and make damn sure those bastards will never break the human rights again by torturing and killing, therefore breaking those human rights."
And when all that happend and all refugees and other immigrants are trying to come to your country, you gladly accept them, because those poor people have no place to live, give them all the support they need with home and money and passport, so they don't have to go back ever again in that god forsaken place.

Appreciate diversity by keeping it diverse.

And now for the last argument I can think of, you will bring, which will be "You are a blind racist...". No, you are. You are with all that politically correct bullshit, not acknowledging all the beautiful race attributes, which the people value greatly in non-western world. Thinking everyone is equal in everything, do you think only "white People" are racists? Every other member of those races actually are and don't really mind to be made fun of because of their asian eyes or curly negroid hair. They too are making fun of our racial attributes.

And the proper term is actually racialist.

[tecumseh35]

When you have Russia and Europe with average IQs of 100, you know this study is completely flawed!

[curvature]

Hey evilion kiss the different material of my halfbreed ass

[Spiffyfable]

Neato!

[RangaRang]

Originally Posted by evilion

I can't believe you believe the leftist lies. There is proof of race everywhere, in plants and animals alike. There is no one race, the human race, because human is a species and species have races. And every race has its good and bad sides.
You can't address a German Shepherd as a Poodle, because the German Shepherd isn't a Poodle, but they are still dogs. The Race isn't determined by the colour of your skin, the colour of the skin is only one attribute belonging to that race. There is also the skull shape, the face structures like lips, ears, nose, chin and so on, the hair structure and colour, eye colour and shape, length, width and the hairiness of the body, and the muscle and brain structure.

For instance, the negroid race is superior in sprinting (because their muscles are made of another material, which is superior for short bursts of energy) and rhythm, or did you see someone sprint faster than someone of negroid race?
The European Descendant aka Indo-Aryan race or caucasian are build stronger and more intelligent , so they were able to produce the biggest and the best kingdoms in the world, dating far back to the sumerians.

The East-Asian Descendant are smarter than all other on avarage level but had far less brilliant people than Indo-Aryans. Thats why most of inventions are made by European Descendant.
Race is not something social or what ever you say it is, it is biological, determined by their genes.
If it would be a social construct then tell me why south africa was a very wealthy colony of the west, only populated by European descendant and rhodesia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesia) was the breadbasket for the entire africa, owned by European descendant farmers and as soon as apartheid ended (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boer and the 2 boer wars) the country has experienced tremendous waves of criminiality and destruction. The necks of many farmers were slit and their family butchered otherwise in Rhodesia region. South Africa has the highest rape rates (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_South_Africa).

Why was Haiti a beautiful place in the hand of the Spanish and when Spain had to retreat from there letting all their slaves loose and giving them the country it became a shithole?
(http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg688...ng&res=landing)
Even after 2 years of the earthquake they are still in the same condition despite the help of other countries. Japan is already on their feets after those tsunamis hit them and will still be when the next tsunami will come and rebuild quickly. Because of discrimination or social structures? What discrimination is there if the majority of that country belongs to the negroid race?

Why was Detroit a phenomenal Place when the majority of its inhabitants were of European descendant? A place full of industry and productivity, culture and freedom. Now after the majority of the populace of that city became negroid, it became a shithole with gangs fighting everywhere and people have to barricade themselves for the night, just so they can sleep without getting murdered in the night.

Why are people of East-Asian descendant better in math and other school subjects, than people of European descendant? You will probably say something like "It's because of the hard parenting". If you take an East-Asian child at birth away from its parents and let it get parented by negroid parents, the kid will still be one of the top of the class.

Why didn't the European Colonist in Australia encountered a thriving Nation with big cities and other things, which are common now in Australia after its colonisation? Australia is a rich country with a rich amount of flora and fauna, you can't deny that.

Why did the aborigines or negroids never invent the wheel?

I know you will say something like "one of my best friends is black/mulatto/hispanic/arabic/indian/south asian and he is a beautiful and intelligent human being", that is fine to have them as friends and have contact to them. I too know and admire some friends of non-European descendant. But they are an exception. They were taken under the parenting of European descendant, so they could actually do something out of them, because 20% of your IQ is corresponding with your environment. But they still show a lot non-European descendant attributes in their behavior and thinking.

You will probably also come up with some arguments about China and being a second world country despite them being more intelligent on avarage level. The country is in a bad shape because of three major events and of course the difference between the European-Descendant and East-Asians.
First, when the British Empire came to visit and colonize, they encountered a very good working economy system, where everyone could be something and everyone lived not bad. It had to be destabilized with drugs and greed, so they made the opium wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars). British had a big technology advantage, having metal platted ships with steamengine and superior guns, who took out fleets on its own. This act destroyed their superior economy, but the country didn't turn to shit.

(second)Then the leftist Communist came and put people like mao on the top of the state and he then took out millions of people, because they were smart. Just like in Soviet union. Did you know that in Emperial Russia they had everything from wealth, culture to living place for everyone? And during the Comminsts it suddenly had no wealth, not enough livingplaces for its inhabitants and no good were able to be bought, despite the industry running 24/7 . That I know for a fact, because my family lived there.

(third)And now the Capitalist are exploatating the country and bringing it to their knees, forcing to look for ressources on other continents (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/p...se-Africa.html).

And racial difference on the account that they have far less brilliant people, than Europe.

Why is there so much suffering in Africa these days? It is really all European-Descendants fault. Not because the slavery or expluatation, it's because of our International Help Fonds. If you give someone a good amount of money every month, they will automaticly stop working. Why work? They can go around and fuck people, sing and dance, eat and drink and sleep. Their population exploaded because of our help and suddenly there is not enough food for everyone, because their farms, which are not that many or big as farms in first world countries, can't produce enough food, because of lack of knowledge, technology and work ethnics. The african slaves introduced rice to european colonists in the thirteen colonies. (http://www.yale.edu/glc/gullah/index.htm) They never domesticated any animals, africa is full of those. There are sheeps and zebras for instance. Africa is really a ressource rich country.

Now its time to say something about the desert I think, because it will be one of your arguments. The Agyptians, which were of Arabic-Descendant and had also some percentage of European blood, survived and build a prosperous civilisation in the desert. And the desert is only in the north parts of africa. Libya was a prosperous country, where a simple Nurse had a payout of 3-4k$ before NATO came and destroyed everything, even doing Warcrimes to achieve their goal. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=26466) (same is happening to syria and iran btw.)

You can't deny facts just because you feel sorry for someone. This "I feel sorry for a certain group of people, because they are getting descriminated for what they really are or look like" has brought destruction and suffering everywhere.

"Oh noes, that country doesn't follow some human rights, we have to invade it, kill everyone in our way, destroy anything they built, take away culture, economy and politics from them and reinstall democracy and make damn sure those bastards will never break the human rights again by torturing and killing, therefore breaking those human rights."
And when all that happend and all refugees and other immigrants are trying to come to your country, you gladly accept them, because those poor people have no place to live, give them all the support they need with home and money and passport, so they don't have to go back ever again in that god forsaken place.

Appreciate diversity by keeping it diverse.

And now for the last argument I can think of, you will bring, which will be "You are a blind racist...". No, you are. You are with all that politically correct bullshit, not acknowledging all the beautiful race attributes, which the people value greatly in non-western world. Thinking everyone is equal in everything, do you think only "white People" are racists? Every other member of those races actually are and don't really mind to be made fun of because of their asian eyes or curly negroid hair. They too are making fun of our racial attributes.

And the proper term is actually racialist.

Evolution causes people over time in certain climes to develop certain things. For instance, in the hot plains of the African continent or the plains of Australia and in the southern areas of the Indian subcontinent, people are dark skinned, wider nosed, and generally grow taller. This does not make them dumber or of worse character. Where things pertain to character, it's culture and society, and these are shaped by economics and the politics that facilitate them. Not leftist lies, just proven by a basic understanding of human psychology. What is one of the largest concepts in biology? That of nature and nurture. Each affects each other, but character is largely a nurture argument as for character to exist, it is implied that the human beings need to socialize, this it is malleable by the society they live in.

Please, by your own logic (and don't use brain drain because that's clearly a leftist lie) explain to me why the original Aryan nations of India, Iran, Pakistan, and Afghanistan have such low IQ's according to this map? Is it possible that the Arabs and Mongols who invaded them infected them with a bug? If so, wouldn't that not make sense? Because, by the assumption of racism, Asian genes from the hordes of Genghis Khan would make the people in those countries superior in mathematics. The Arab genes, of course, being that they are Semitic, would make them shrewd, calculated, and greedy. Okay, let's throw in wild and angry as well. So, with those racial characteristics of wildness, anger, calculation, shrewdness, greediness, and superior intelligence, why aren't people from those ancient Aryan homelands ruling the world?

African countries will always have problems. Not because they are dumb, but because Africa is a geographically huge continent with a relatively smaller population, rich in valuable resources, and has a long history of being used by colonial powers. Most successful civilizations started near a body of water as maritime access boosts commerce and relations with other nations. Most of Africa is surrounded by vast, endless ocean. The North of Africa, with its proximity to Europe and Asia, was the home of the Egyptians and Carthaginians. And the latter, comprised of lazy, demanding, welfare types and wild, raging camel jockeys whooped Rome's ass repeatedly that it is still talked about in history books. In fact, white Aryan (actually, a mix of Afro-Semitic-Mediterreanean and only part Aryan) Rome was whooped repeatedly by the Parthians, Goths, Britons, Spaniards, and Turks, only to fall to (at that time, uncivilized) European tribesmen spearheaded by the Huns who were an Asiatic nomad group that was known for cannibalism and poor hygeine, and whose average warrior's height was roughly 4'9".

So is it "biologically determined" race that makes certain groups better than others? Not really. If evolution was so quick, then South African whites would be black by now, as would Australians, and South American Europeans would be all dark by now. Evolution that causes a species to break into subspecies occurs over tens of thousands of years, if not more. What determines how well certain people do compared to others is NECESSITY. The British were compelled to become a great world empire because they were a tiny, fractured island that had no resources of its own and ample environment to develop a powerful navy and make use of their maritime commerce. The Germans became (and failed ultimately) a powerful military empire because they were surrounded by ideological and ethnic enemies and because they were taken advantage of by their neighbors. The Japanese became a powerful force because they, too, had no resources of their own. They tried the British way, made an empire, then lost a devastating war and decided to excel economically, that is, to build a commercial empire. Why have the Persians been doing badly for hundreds of years now? Because they are all but landlocked due to losing land little by little. Now that the world needs the Persian Gulf for oil, they can't use the waterway to develop a strong navy or use it solely for their own commercial purposes. Why is America so successful? It conquered (through conniving and savagery) the space of nearly an entire continent, coast to coast, enabling it maritime power and enough resources to last on its own. This enabled America to grow exponentially to the point that whatever economic decision is made here affects every country. You cannot simplify the human condition to biology. That's the easy way out, and it gives you haught. I want to ask you specifically how you feel about the many Asians, Indians, and Middle-Easterners that are now in important positions in the US economy? The Jewish in the banking and media sectors? Surely if they were all backward genetically, they couldn't have made it so far. Why are the "Aryan pride" drum beaters all delinquents, drunkards, and on welfare? These are the same pure whites that should be at the top, right? Racism is neither biologically correct nor a healthy way of looking at things. Sure, some groups have certain characteristics, hell, some groups of people engage in practices and have attitudes that are below what we here would call "civilized". But it's not enough to call it that without understanding how it came to be and how we came to look down at it. And that has to do with culture and socialization. I'm libertarian by the way, and hate abortion.

[Feirefiz]

There are no races among us humans!
"Race" is an out-dated term of the 19th century.
A "race" would be a result of purposeful breeding and man was never bred purposefully. Modern genetics prove just the opposite: Very often people share less genes with a random neighbour than with a particular human on the other side of the world. It's true!
Racialism is nothing but a blunt ideology for people who only see the most obvious things...
Compare these two pictures and you'll see that the term "race" is total bs relating to man.

[Feirefiz]

...so, as long as you can't show me a person with super-long legs, lop ears, a mouth, that could swallow me in one piece and running thrice as faster than me, your "races" stay unproven and you're nothing but stupid and I mistrust your IQ!