#31
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/EcFQIGwWrp8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> i do not condone racism in any form whether it's couched in pseudo intellectual terms or outright bigotry and mindless hatred, i just thought this song sums up the entire thread nicely. ![]() hate me i don't give a fuck ![]() by the way skrewdriver are a band from Blackpool and never made it big until they started putting out white power anthems |
The Following Users Say Fuck Off To This Post By Arsedestroyer: | ||
Feirefiz |
#32
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
Damn asians...lol
|
#33
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
A lively tune! Racism Shmacism! Boys will be boys and its fun the shake your fist and stomp your boots against otha fuckas. The problem is though - it will be hard raising the nation all by yourselves. Not many girls in the nation ![]() |
#34
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
This thread is for closet racists who need to back up their childhood resentments against people of a certain race with "science".
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RangaRang For This Useful Post: | ||
curvature, Feirefiz, rob666 |
#35
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
All the stupid people call this racism.. since their moma told them that racism is to blame for everything. Other who can understand the research face-palm . ![]() |
#36
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
Others who are laymen - not scientists. But believe what you want. Find comfort in your nationality being something indicative of some kind of superiority, something you had nothing to do with. Unlike your own personal interior deficits.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to curvature For This Useful Post: | ||
slash4321 |
#37
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
So now rejecting largely disproved science is the same as blaming racism? You're just using a blatant straw man argument that no one here has actually made. Purely genetic explanations for intelligence are quickly fading into the same obscurity that physiognomy, phrenology, alchemy, reflexology, etc eventually did. You're holding on to a debunked concept for reasons I can only guess are political or ideological.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dean mclean For This Useful Post: | ||
curvature |
#38
|
Re: Race and Intelligence
Racism is disproven and foolish. But knowing and judging cultures is perfectly okay. I am willing to say that many cultures are plain terrible and one should be on the lookout for a person's culture. But culture has nothing to do with science and everything to do with social engineering.
|
#39
| |
Re: Race and Intelligence
Quote:
reposted as it must have been too sardonic and i can't edit my previous post ![]() |
#40
| ||||||||
My Rank: PRIVATE Poster Rank:12897 male Join Date: Jan 2012 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 0 Post(s)
| ||||||||
Re: Race and Intelligence
I can't believe you believe the leftist lies. There is proof of race everywhere, in plants and animals alike. There is no one race, the human race, because human is a species and species have races. And every race has its good and bad sides. You can't address a German Shepherd as a Poodle, because the German Shepherd isn't a Poodle, but they are still dogs. The Race isn't determined by the colour of your skin, the colour of the skin is only one attribute belonging to that race. There is also the skull shape, the face structures like lips, ears, nose, chin and so on, the hair structure and colour, eye colour and shape, length, width and the hairiness of the body, and the muscle and brain structure. For instance, the negroid race is superior in sprinting (because their muscles are made of another material, which is superior for short bursts of energy) and rhythm, or did you see someone sprint faster than someone of negroid race? The European Descendant aka Indo-Aryan race or caucasian are build stronger and more intelligent , so they were able to produce the biggest and the best kingdoms in the world, dating far back to the sumerians. The East-Asian Descendant are smarter than all other on avarage level but had far less brilliant people than Indo-Aryans. Thats why most of inventions are made by European Descendant. Race is not something social or what ever you say it is, it is biological, determined by their genes. If it would be a social construct then tell me why south africa was a very wealthy colony of the west, only populated by European descendant and rhodesia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhodesia) was the breadbasket for the entire africa, owned by European descendant farmers and as soon as apartheid ended (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boer and the 2 boer wars) the country has experienced tremendous waves of criminiality and destruction. The necks of many farmers were slit and their family butchered otherwise in Rhodesia region. South Africa has the highest rape rates (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crime_in_South_Africa). Why was Haiti a beautiful place in the hand of the Spanish and when Spain had to retreat from there letting all their slaves loose and giving them the country it became a shithole? (http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg688...ng&res=landing) Even after 2 years of the earthquake they are still in the same condition despite the help of other countries. Japan is already on their feets after those tsunamis hit them and will still be when the next tsunami will come and rebuild quickly. Because of discrimination or social structures? What discrimination is there if the majority of that country belongs to the negroid race? Why was Detroit a phenomenal Place when the majority of its inhabitants were of European descendant? A place full of industry and productivity, culture and freedom. Now after the majority of the populace of that city became negroid, it became a shithole with gangs fighting everywhere and people have to barricade themselves for the night, just so they can sleep without getting murdered in the night. Why are people of East-Asian descendant better in math and other school subjects, than people of European descendant? You will probably say something like "It's because of the hard parenting". If you take an East-Asian child at birth away from its parents and let it get parented by negroid parents, the kid will still be one of the top of the class. Why didn't the European Colonist in Australia encountered a thriving Nation with big cities and other things, which are common now in Australia after its colonisation? Australia is a rich country with a rich amount of flora and fauna, you can't deny that. Why did the aborigines or negroids never invent the wheel? I know you will say something like "one of my best friends is black/mulatto/hispanic/arabic/indian/south asian and he is a beautiful and intelligent human being", that is fine to have them as friends and have contact to them. I too know and admire some friends of non-European descendant. But they are an exception. They were taken under the parenting of European descendant, so they could actually do something out of them, because 20% of your IQ is corresponding with your environment. But they still show a lot non-European descendant attributes in their behavior and thinking. You will probably also come up with some arguments about China and being a second world country despite them being more intelligent on avarage level. The country is in a bad shape because of three major events and of course the difference between the European-Descendant and East-Asians. First, when the British Empire came to visit and colonize, they encountered a very good working economy system, where everyone could be something and everyone lived not bad. It had to be destabilized with drugs and greed, so they made the opium wars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars). British had a big technology advantage, having metal platted ships with steamengine and superior guns, who took out fleets on its own. This act destroyed their superior economy, but the country didn't turn to shit. (second)Then the leftist Communist came and put people like mao on the top of the state and he then took out millions of people, because they were smart. Just like in Soviet union. Did you know that in Emperial Russia they had everything from wealth, culture to living place for everyone? And during the Comminsts it suddenly had no wealth, not enough livingplaces for its inhabitants and no good were able to be bought, despite the industry running 24/7 . That I know for a fact, because my family lived there. (third)And now the Capitalist are exploatating the country and bringing it to their knees, forcing to look for ressources on other continents (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/p...se-Africa.html). And racial difference on the account that they have far less brilliant people, than Europe. Why is there so much suffering in Africa these days? It is really all European-Descendants fault. Not because the slavery or expluatation, it's because of our International Help Fonds. If you give someone a good amount of money every month, they will automaticly stop working. Why work? They can go around and fuck people, sing and dance, eat and drink and sleep. Their population exploaded because of our help and suddenly there is not enough food for everyone, because their farms, which are not that many or big as farms in first world countries, can't produce enough food, because of lack of knowledge, technology and work ethnics. The african slaves introduced rice to european colonists in the thirteen colonies. (http://www.yale.edu/glc/gullah/index.htm) They never domesticated any animals, africa is full of those. There are sheeps and zebras for instance. Africa is really a ressource rich country. Now its time to say something about the desert I think, because it will be one of your arguments. The Agyptians, which were of Arabic-Descendant and had also some percentage of European blood, survived and build a prosperous civilisation in the desert. And the desert is only in the north parts of africa. Libya was a prosperous country, where a simple Nurse had a payout of 3-4k$ before NATO came and destroyed everything, even doing Warcrimes to achieve their goal. (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=26466) (same is happening to syria and iran btw.) You can't deny facts just because you feel sorry for someone. This "I feel sorry for a certain group of people, because they are getting descriminated for what they really are or look like" has brought destruction and suffering everywhere. "Oh noes, that country doesn't follow some human rights, we have to invade it, kill everyone in our way, destroy anything they built, take away culture, economy and politics from them and reinstall democracy and make damn sure those bastards will never break the human rights again by torturing and killing, therefore breaking those human rights." And when all that happend and all refugees and other immigrants are trying to come to your country, you gladly accept them, because those poor people have no place to live, give them all the support they need with home and money and passport, so they don't have to go back ever again in that god forsaken place. Appreciate diversity by keeping it diverse. And now for the last argument I can think of, you will bring, which will be "You are a blind racist...". No, you are. You are with all that politically correct bullshit, not acknowledging all the beautiful race attributes, which the people value greatly in non-western world. Thinking everyone is equal in everything, do you think only "white People" are racists? Every other member of those races actually are and don't really mind to be made fun of because of their asian eyes or curly negroid hair. They too are making fun of our racial attributes. And the proper term is actually racialist. |
The Following 2 Users Said Fuck Off to evilion For This Post: | ||
Feirefiz,
rob666 |