[RedneckR0nin]

Originally Posted by sicka ↗

the best 9/11 truth movement site: http://www.ae911truth.org/

Who have been caught doctoring graphs and charts to read what they want to convey.

I also went through the list of registered architects and engineers and not one posses the proper certification to build a steel structure high rise.

Do they make some good points? Yes they do. Are they factually correct in everything they say.. Definitely not.

[synthninja]

What about WTC 7..

There's a video of owner Larry Silverstein saying the decision was made (on the very day of 9-11) to "pull" the building.

The argument can be made that the buildings did not fall into their exact footprint like a real professional demolition job. The techniques used for demolition can easily be tweaked to be less precise, giving a much more natural look to the resulting rubble or DUST as it was in the case of 9-11. It's harder to make it fall into it's own footprint, obviously...so when you say it can't be demolition because it's not precise enough, this is simply not true.. If anything it just means demolition would take less time to set-up and therefore be even MORE likely to be the true cause.

He also lies about the mast/aerial hitting WTC7... ..this is known to be FALSE. In video footage of the scene we can clearly see the mast falling in the OPPOSITE direction of WTC7.

Also his attitude was disgustingly cold in regard to the people of New Yorks wishes for the 16 acres of now sacred land. In isolation this doesn't mean much, but given Larry Silversteins obvious lies, I think this is an important piece of information to bare in mind.

US Secret Service were tennants of WTC7 (that's just by the way).

There must be hundreds of points I've came across and listing them all for you would take a long long time. Just do your own research on it. You haven't read enough if you still trust the Bush administration/shadow government of that time...believe me.

For me the fact theres so many suspicious facts and so many questions, surrounding all the troubled sites...is enough to mistrust the relevant people we must mistrust. For the GOOD of American people...and us all.

I would argue that NOT investigating and questioning the government, is more unAmerican than questioning them. You only stand to get an improved government. That is not anti government.....it's anti-criminal.

I'm no conspiracy theorist. I know the government knew about it and did nothing to stop it. I'm not brainwashed.

I love America. Very pro America. Lot's of clever people, Lot's of successful people there. I don't like to see them suffer, that's all.

Oh and by the way, the title of this thread seems like a personal attack on someone.

[Billthegravedigger]

I don't know about the 346 foot tv antenna hitting WTC # 7, like you said it went the other direction. The North wall of the North Tower did come down and hit WTC # 7, and WTC # 7 was leaning South for a while before it collapsed.

[RedneckR0nin]

Originally Posted by synthninja ↗

What about WTC 7..

There's a video of owner Larry Silverstein saying the decision was made (on the very day of 9-11) to "pull" the building.

The argument can be made that the buildings did not fall into their exact footprint like a real professional demolition job. The techniques used for demolition can easily be tweaked to be less precise, giving a much more natural look to the resulting rubble or DUST as it was in the case of 9-11. It's harder to make it fall into it's own footprint, obviously...so when you say it can't be demolition because it's not precise enough, this is simply not true.. If anything it just means demolition would take less time to set-up and therefore be even MORE likely to be the true cause.

He also lies about the mast/aerial hitting WTC7... ..this is known to be FALSE. In video footage of the scene we can clearly see the mast falling in the OPPOSITE direction of WTC7.

Also his attitude was disgustingly cold in regard to the people of New Yorks wishes for the 16 acres of now sacred land. In isolation this doesn't mean much, but given Larry Silversteins obvious lies, I think this is an important piece of information to bare in mind.

US Secret Service were tennants of WTC7 (that's just by the way).

There must be hundreds of points I've came across and listing them all for you would take a long long time. Just do your own research on it. You haven't read enough if you still trust the Bush administration/shadow government of that time...believe me.

For me the fact theres so many suspicious facts and so many questions, surrounding all the troubled sites...is enough to mistrust the relevant people we must mistrust. For the GOOD of American people...and us all.

I would argue that NOT investigating and questioning the government, is more unAmerican than questioning them. You only stand to get an improved government. That is not anti government.....it's anti-criminal.

I'm no conspiracy theorist. I know the government knew about it and did nothing to stop it. I'm not brainwashed.

I love America. Very pro America. Lot's of clever people, Lot's of successful people there. I don't like to see them suffer, that's all.

Oh and by the way, the title of this thread seems like a personal attack on someone.

The title of thread is meant to be directed toward someone. Not a personal attack just to get his attention.

I have read about and researched this far more than you believe. If you want to have WTC 7 explained there is another thread in here about it. The best thing about all of this is the mind set of people that do think it's a conspiracy. Ask Bill if you don't believe me. Bill and I as well as Dan have been here for years. We have not swayed on our opinions. When I think of those two outside of this topic they are reasonable men that are intelligent. When I think of people that side on the conspiracy side of things, all I think of is them needing to be hospitalized minus John. So you see the most damage to your beliefs don't come from us who know it was what it was. It comes from your own people that share your beliefs, frankly most are social rejects and a few bricks shy of a load. Don't blame us blame yourselves.

[RedneckR0nin]

Oh and by the way I'm pro America too. I may be Canadian but I love that country with all my heart. I love Americans and I love the fact you are my neighbor.
It is unamerican to not investigate the events of that day. But they did and using some of the best minds in their respective fields.

[Billthegravedigger]

When Silverstein said pull it, it meant pull everyone back away from the Soloman Tower, or WTC # 7, whichever you prefer to call it. It was damaged by the North Tower, and burned unchecked for hours. The penthouse broke off, and seconds later, the rest came down too.

That tower did not have resonating explosions like a building that is controlled demolition man, it was the building collapsing, that is it. Not a succession of explosions.

[RedneckR0nin]

^ All of which we have addressed in countless other threads such as this one below that addresses WTC 7 exclusively!



Fuck Bill I grow tired of repeating the same fucking shit over and over and over and over and over and over and over

http://www.documentingreality.com/fo...omes-up-92790/

[dandroid]

that infamous statement of 'pulling it'...wtc 7 would have required explosives in place prior to the event....as we expand on this...we start to see way too many people involved...to the point of absurdity

[RedneckR0nin]

Originally Posted by dandroid ↗

that infamous statement of 'pulling it'...wtc 7 would have required explosives in place prior to the event....as we expand on this...we start to see way too many people involved...to the point of absurdity

Thank you...not for supporting my viewpoint but for injecting some logical thought into this thread!

[Billthegravedigger]

I second that RnR.