JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
9/11 Explained to Roelly - Section 9

9/11 Explained to Roelly 

Current Rating:

Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Thread Tools
  #81  
10-22-2011, 12:30 AM
dotaku's Avatar
dotaku
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:3263
male
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 113
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss113
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

anyone who believes the plane took down the wtc and building 7 is a fuckin retard
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
Kazoo
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Join the party
Join Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #82  
11-09-2011, 05:14 PM
Onslaught
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:7282
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss27
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

I am still waiting on an answer or explanation.
  #83  
11-09-2011, 08:09 PM
666Marduk999
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2093
Gotacock...or Goatcock?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 231
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss231
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

There are 1300+ architects and engineers who would personally kick the shit out of you for going through this much effort to look stupid. Internally supported buildings don't fall STRAIGHT FUCKING DOWN FROM AN IMPACT AT FREE FALL SPEED.

Oh, and what happened to WTC7? They rigged a 70 story building to implode in an afternoon? Or did they rig it so surprise demo on the very same day as WTC1& 2 were hit by airplanes.

Oh hey, kinda forgot to mention that these buildings were supported by 46 internal support columns and were built to withstand a direct impact from a Boeing 707.

Or the numerous other steel buildings that burned for DAYS and never collapsed.

You ever see pictures of a plane crash? Didn't think so. Go find some, then compare them to the crashes in Shanksville and DC. No luggage, no seats, no bodies, no airplane parts...just a smoldering hole in the ground.

The people responsible for this atrocity are lucky to have a boatload of retards like you out there who just eat up some CNN and fox news. I wish your mom would have drowned you in the bathtub when you were a baby and saved us all that horribly stupid read.
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
DrChilds
  #84  
11-10-2011, 05:26 AM
RedneckR0nin's Avatar
RedneckR0nin
Offline:
goinggoingGONE
Poster Rank:33
I am a man yes I am and tell ya so
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 46,444
 
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Quoted: 6608 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
5/20 18/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss46444
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

Oh, fighting on the internet. How awesome.
On this subject it's fucking never ending
  #85  
11-10-2011, 05:35 AM
RedneckR0nin's Avatar
RedneckR0nin
Offline:
goinggoingGONE
Poster Rank:33
I am a man yes I am and tell ya so
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 46,444
 
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Quoted: 6608 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
5/20 18/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss46444
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

There are 1300+ architects and engineers who would personally kick the shit out of you for going through this much effort to look stupid. Internally supported buildings don't fall STRAIGHT FUCKING DOWN FROM AN IMPACT AT FREE FALL SPEED.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/qLShZOvxVe4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Oh, and what happened to WTC7? They rigged a 70 story building to implode in an afternoon? Or did they rig it so surprise demo on the very same day as WTC1& 2 were hit by airplanes.
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/uFJa9WUy5QI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Oh hey, kinda forgot to mention that these buildings were supported by 46 internal support columns and were built to withstand a direct impact from a Boeing 707. Again that means nothing..the Titanic was also unsinkable!

Or the numerous other steel buildings that burned for DAYS and never collapsed.
Has nothing to do with the fact that other buildings did this or that, the circumstances and engineering of the buildings allowed the collapse to happen...research the structural engineering and physics of the structural failure and it adds up!
You ever see pictures of a plane crash? Uhhh...which one we talking now? Didn't think so. Go find some, then compare them to the crashes in Shanksville and DC. No luggage, no seats, no bodies, no airplane parts...just a smoldering hole in the ground.
Ummm sure!
The people responsible for this atrocity are lucky to have a boatload of retards like you out there who just eat up some CNN and fox news. I wish your mom would have drowned you in the bathtub when you were a baby and saved us all that horribly stupid read.

Actually science and mathematics proved this to me..I don't mind CNN but only for business and Fox is lame!
Well I am glad my mommy never did such things cause then I couldn't have this adult and mature debate with you at the present moment now could I?
  #86  
11-10-2011, 08:42 AM
666Marduk999
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2093
Gotacock...or Goatcock?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 231
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss231
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Yer a twat, and thousands of people smarter than you agree.
  #87  
11-10-2011, 08:46 AM
666Marduk999
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2093
Gotacock...or Goatcock?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 231
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss231
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

Then of course, you are probably more schooled on the subjects of structural engineering and high-rise architecture than structural engineers and architects, right?
  #88  
11-10-2011, 09:45 AM
RedneckR0nin's Avatar
RedneckR0nin
Offline:
goinggoingGONE
Poster Rank:33
I am a man yes I am and tell ya so
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 46,444
 
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Quoted: 6608 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
5/20 18/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss46444
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

http://www.ae911truth.org/

Yer a twat, and thousands of people smarter than you agree.
Been there..don't much agree with anything it imply's or claims to prove!
  #89  
11-10-2011, 09:47 AM
RedneckR0nin's Avatar
RedneckR0nin
Offline:
goinggoingGONE
Poster Rank:33
I am a man yes I am and tell ya so
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 46,444
 
Mentioned: 65 Post(s)
Quoted: 6608 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
5/20 18/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss46444
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

Then of course, you are probably more schooled on the subjects of structural engineering and high-rise architecture than structural engineers and architects, right?
Never said anything about that, just know when you do the math it works out...far more plausible than the silly theories of planned explosives and all that other nonsense!
  #90  
11-10-2011, 10:38 AM
666Marduk999
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2093
Gotacock...or Goatcock?
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 231
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss231
Re: 9/11 Explained to Roelly

You cannot ignore a whole load of evidence just because it doesn't fit the official story. Once again, you are an idiot for believing any of it.


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO