JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
The Lynching of Jesse Washington - Section 5

The Lynching of Jesse Washington 

Current Rating:

Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Thread Tools
  #41  
12-01-2015, 03:47 AM
badassbaldbastard's Avatar
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:3747
Male
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 88
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 11/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss88
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

Don't you agree that he is guilty of killing Nicole and Ron Goldman?
Whether or not OJ killed Ron and Nicole is irrelevant. Let's say for the sake of argument that you are right in your suppositions that:
1.) His confession was legit and un-coerced.
2.) He had a fair trial which included an impartial jury of his peers and competent representation.
3.) The jury considered all of the evidence and mitigating factors and found him guilty.
4.) He was lawfully sentenced to die.
All of the above Still doesn't justify the mob being the ones to execute him and to do it in such a cruel fashion. The Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments and it's my opinion that this barbaric action meets the above 2 criteria.

Look I understand being angry and pissed. I get wanting make sure a guilty person pays the price, but is this really what we want to be? I think we are better than that.

Anyway, my .02, probably not even worth that much.
4 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
flailingmeatmech, rob666, Sonnirae, winvens
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Real Amateur Street Fighting Videos
View Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #42  
12-01-2015, 05:29 AM
Zambini's Avatar
Zambini
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Pull on it
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25,957
Contributions: 3
 
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Quoted: 12750 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25957
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

Whether or not OJ killed Ron and Nicole is irrelevant. Let's say for the sake of argument that you are right in your suppositions that:
1.) His confession was legit and un-coerced.
2.) He had a fair trial which included an impartial jury of his peers and competent representation.
3.) The jury considered all of the evidence and mitigating factors and found him guilty.
4.) He was lawfully sentenced to die.
All of the above Still doesn't justify the mob being the ones to execute him and to do it in such a cruel fashion. The Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishments and it's my opinion that this barbaric action meets the above 2 criteria.

Look I understand being angry and pissed. I get wanting make sure a guilty person pays the price, but is this really what we want to be? I think we are better than that.

Anyway, my .02, probably not even worth that much.
I would say killing anyone, any fashion is cruel and unusual since I rarely see it.
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
facing_reality
This User Says Fuck You to This Post:
flailingmeatmech
  #43  
12-01-2015, 10:35 PM
badassbaldbastard's Avatar
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:3747
Male
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 88
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 11/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss88
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

I would say killing anyone, any fashion is cruel and unusual since I rarely see it.
What this mob did was murder. Justify it, condone it, defend it. If it makes you feel better more power to you.
3 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
flailingmeatmech, lovelylucinda, winvens
  #44  
12-02-2015, 03:19 AM
Zambini's Avatar
Zambini
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Pull on it
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25,957
Contributions: 3
 
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Quoted: 12750 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25957
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

What this mob did was murder. Justify it, condone it, defend it. If it makes you feel better more power to you.
Isn't execution murder?

Justify it, condone it, defend it.

It obviously makes you better if it is done YOUR way.

But the end is result is:

The guilty is dead

And the victims never have a say in their manner of death, so who really cares?

Dead is dead
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
facing_reality, ouagadougou
This User Says Fuck You to This Post:
flailingmeatmech
  #45  
12-02-2015, 04:04 AM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
★ Legacy Member ★
Poster Rank:100
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 16,280
 
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Quoted: 8638 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16280
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

Isn't execution murder?

Justify it, condone it, defend it.

It obviously makes you better if it is done YOUR way.

But the end is result is:

The guilty is dead

And the victims never have a say in their manner of death, so who really cares?

Dead is dead
You sure about that?
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
flailingmeatmech
  #46  
12-02-2015, 04:10 AM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
★ Legacy Member ★
Poster Rank:100
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 16,280
 
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Quoted: 8638 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16280
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

Don't you agree that he is guilty of killing Nicole and Ron Goldman?
I think that if this dead kid found himself facing the case OJ was up against, without OJ's resources, he'd have been found guilty.

The percentage of people that plead out is well into the 90's....... Even today if you don't have the resources to mount a defense, the public defender will tell you to take a deal even if he thinks you're innocent.

So, take a 16 year old black kid, a Sheriff looking to close a highly public case with an election imminent, a local media sensationalizing and promoting a mob mentality, while eliminating any possibility of an unbiased jury....... An all white jury? a 4 minute deliberation?

Yeah, seems legit to me
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
flailingmeatmech, winvens
  #47  
12-02-2015, 06:02 AM
Zambini's Avatar
Zambini
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Pull on it
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25,957
Contributions: 3
 
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Quoted: 12750 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25957
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

I think that if this dead kid found himself facing the case OJ was up against, without OJ's resources, he'd have been found guilty.

The percentage of people that plead out is well into the 90's....... Even today if you don't have the resources to mount a defense, the public defender will tell you to take a deal even if he thinks you're innocent.

So, take a 16 year old black kid, a Sheriff looking to close a highly public case with an election imminent, a local media sensationalizing and promoting a mob mentality, while eliminating any possibility of an unbiased jury....... An all white jury? a 4 minute deliberation?

Yeah, seems legit to me
Good, glad we finally agree

The jury really wasn't needed with his confession, that's why it only took 4 minutes.

(Is the weed giving you the giggles today?)
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
Bletch, facing_reality
These 2 Users Said Fuck Off To This Post:
flailingmeatmech, lovelylucinda
  #48  
12-02-2015, 06:02 AM
Zambini's Avatar
Zambini
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Pull on it
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25,957
Contributions: 3
 
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Quoted: 12750 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25957
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

You sure about that?
He said he was guilty

What evidence is there that he wasn't?
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
Bletch, facing_reality
These 2 Users Said Fuck Off To This Post:
flailingmeatmech, lovelylucinda
  #49  
12-02-2015, 11:28 PM
badassbaldbastard's Avatar
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:3747
Male
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 88
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 11/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss88
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

Isn't execution murder?

Justify it, condone it, defend it.

It obviously makes you better if it is done YOUR way.

But the end is result is:

The guilty is dead

And the victims never have a say in their manner of death, so who really cares?

Dead is dead
No, the death penalty is not murder, it is homicide, but not murder. Intent and legal standing are the difference.
It's not my way, it's the law.
Correct, victims don't have a choice in their manner of death.
Correct, dead is dead.
You seem to be convinced that this kid was guilty. You say he confessed. If everyone who confesses is guilty then why have 92 convictions, based on a confession been overturned due to DNA evidence? They confessed--how can they be innocent?
I promise if you are put in a room under the right circumstance there are people that could make you confess to a crime you didn't commit, without ever laying a hand on you.
I'll admit, I have no idea if this kid is guilty or innocent. I didn't see any evidence either way. I've only heard conjecture and the confession of a kid.
What I do know is that he is innocent until proven guilty. He was never afforded that luxury.
If someone had murdered my wife or mother, I would want to make that person die a horrible death. But, it would only be a want. Killing the person for my own personal pleasure would leave me a shell of a human.
I understand rage, but if one must be able to control it.
I know I won't change your mind and that's cool. It's been a good debate, and that is why our society works!
2 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
flailingmeatmech, Sonnirae
  #50  
12-03-2015, 03:28 AM
Zambini's Avatar
Zambini
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Pull on it
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 25,957
Contributions: 3
 
Mentioned: 160 Post(s)
Quoted: 12750 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25957
Re: The Lynching of Jesse Washington

No, the death penalty is not murder, it is homicide, but not murder. Intent and legal standing are the difference.
It's not my way, it's the law.
Correct, victims don't have a choice in their manner of death.
Correct, dead is dead.
You seem to be convinced that this kid was guilty. You say he confessed. If everyone who confesses is guilty then why have 92 convictions, based on a confession been overturned due to DNA evidence? They confessed--how can they be innocent?
I promise if you are put in a room under the right circumstance there are people that could make you confess to a crime you didn't commit, without ever laying a hand on you.
I'll admit, I have no idea if this kid is guilty or innocent. I didn't see any evidence either way. I've only heard conjecture and the confession of a kid.
What I do know is that he is innocent until proven guilty. He was never afforded that luxury.
If someone had murdered my wife or mother, I would want to make that person die a horrible death. But, it would only be a want. Killing the person for my own personal pleasure would leave me a shell of a human.
I understand rage, but if one must be able to control it.
I know I won't change your mind and that's cool. It's been a good debate, and that is why our society works!
I'm not convinced he's guilty, I was responding to those that posted they knew certain unproven or unpublished facts about this case.

None of us knows the truth, just like many cases today, as you pointed out.

It keeps the mind sharp to question everything

Plus, I just like to poke rob with a stick sometimes, and he pokes back

Good debate indeed
4 Users Say Thank You For This Post:
badassbaldbastard, facing_reality, rob666, Sonnirae


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO