Originally Posted by Creepy ↗

why would it be expected gun hater? we could go throw rocks at them or billy club them to death.

do raspberries and nanny nanny booo booo's

? what?

stevee? wanna do some raspberries and nanny nannny boo boo's wi me?

:P

Originally Posted by Creepy ↗

Ignorance tolerance zero. Never can know enough. Sexy, Big titty, brunette, mommy of two. Outdoorsy type, raised by a hunter and a Man (see my definition of man below). :D Absolutely zero confidence in the last 2 or 3 decades of politicians we have been force fed. Big Big Fan of Lincoln, Washington, & Reagan. Men. Like men. the strong, intelligent, and capable ones. Not afraid of anything. Except bee's. Go figure.

If I was not already married to a woman who appears to be your twin sister I'd be asking you out.

Mine likes guns too and is afraid of wasps.

Originally Posted by 5150 ↗

If I was not already married to a woman who appears to be your twin sister I'd be asking you out.

Mine likes guns too and is afraid of wasps.

beasts, I know her pain. nice to meet you. :)

[pbaj12]

Originally Posted by Stevee ↗

So if a thief gets blown away by some householder it was good because they had a gun to protect themselves right? so the next time they are robbed the thief will be armed too, yes I don't see the logic in that if you arm all the victims the thieves follow suit, it's a lose lose situation.

Well if a homeowner blew away a thief..I doubt he'd come back at all since he'd be in the ground or jail.

Plus, why would a thief break into someone's house when there's a good chance that the person will be armed? Why not pick someone they know isn't home or unarmed?
If you're a thief and all you do is break into houses where the people have guns..I don't think you'll be in business for too long even if you carry a gun.

So I'm assuming you would rather be a person unarmed against a thief than armed against a thief?
I don't see the logic there but to each their own.

I think if the bad guy has something, the good guy should have something just as good if not better.

Originally Posted by Creepy ↗

why would it be expected gun hater? we could go throw rocks at them or billy club them to death. do raspberries or nanny nanny boo boo's?

this some good shit right here :D

[Steve]

Originally Posted by 5150 ↗

Stevee,

Is your real name Charles?

No STEVE actually.

[Steve]

Originally Posted by pbaj12 ↗

Well if a homeowner blew away a thief..I doubt he'd come back at all since he'd be in the ground or jail.

Plus, why would a thief break into someone's house when there's a good chance that the person will be armed? Why not pick someone they know isn't home or unarmed?
If you're a thief and all you do is break into houses where the people have guns..I don't think you'll be in business for too long even if you carry a gun.

So I'm assuming you would rather be a person unarmed against a thief than armed against a thief?
I don't see the logic there but to each their own.

I think if the bad guy has something, the good guy should have something just as good if not better.

If you can't understand what I wrote and why then fair enough.