[MrCorpse]

I don't like pigs but that was kinda impressive.

[mattmanes]

Showed us this vid in the academy! LOVE IT!!!:2gunsfiring_ v1::2gunsfiring_v1 :

[SpicyWeiner]

Overreacting a little? Damn.

[Taco187]

Shooting through a windshield like a boss!!!

[sucka88]

Let's face it, we're probably better off without this piece of shit crim. The police often rid the world of rubbish like this. :) I like cops! :D

[dregs]

Originally Posted by EyeOnX ↗

Something very wrong here. The officer did not try to pull them over in the beginning (as stated in the article) nor did the driver of the car try to ram the cop (as seen in the video). The car was only assumed to be stolen (according to the article), but according to the video, the police at first was not sure what make of vehicle it was. The excuse to give chase was bogus. Only at the 1:26 mark of the video the driver should have pulled over, but towards the end the officer who rammed the car was being told the car was stopping. He did not have to ram the car. It could have been blocked.

According to the article "As officers pursued the car at speeds up to 100 mph, they said Bennett rammed his car into a police cruiser, then hit a tree.". According to the video, this did not happen, instead the officer rammed into Bennett.

At this point the video gets confusing and impossible to say if the driver had actually accelerated towards the officers after impact, but watch the bottom split of the screen…at the 3:49 mark a police car is seen ramming a car and at 3:52 the cruiser with the video rolling also hits a car. WTF??? I question this entire video.

IMO overall, the officer who initiated the chase was in the wrong from the very beginning and fabricated parts of the story. even though the driver was in the wrong considering he did not pull over when he should have…does not make what the police did any less wrong. The officer who initiated the chase should be fired.

Good post. I had the same questions as you with the inaccuracies between the article and the video.

If you watch the headlights of the stolen car just before the shooting (the first vision of it, not the replay), I think you can see the cop move in front of the car, then jump on the car, and then car headlights move as the car accelerates, which also goes against what the cops said (assuming article correctly quoted them)

[WH Bonney]

This is a case where the car is the deadly weapon, and the shooting is self defense.

[bagofsmoke]

ahha haaardcore, still a dick for just shooting him though lol

[odiesmedley]

hell YA

[Nanina]

The suspense was killing me.