|
#173
●
02-22-2012, 03:55 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1634 Male Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 336 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 4 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Traumatic Dismemberment Crossing the Street
If the story is true regarding survival for another 48 hours, it would be highly unusual first from the extreme trauma of the person's injuries and second from the scene photos themselves devoid of any medical responders administering any aid to the alleged survivor.
|
|
#174
●
02-22-2012, 04:01 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1634 Male Join Date: Nov 2010 Posts: 336 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 4 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Traumatic Dismemberment Crossing the Street
It would in fact be actionable criminal negligence if the responder's first priority was to first record such photos if the victim were still alive and and not being stabilized. So I'm thinking the victim here is obviously deceased at the scene.
|
|
#176
●
02-22-2012, 06:49 PM
|
|
Re: Traumatic Dismemberment Crossing the Street
There is NO way that person is alive. First...the color of her skin would indicate that she bled out. Second, those type of horrific injuries would kill you in minutes, if not seconds. She was probably dead on first impact with anything.
|