Go Back  

Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
 
  #1  
Old 11-22-2013, 01:01 AM
Megamel29's Avatar
Megamel29
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:283
Female
Join Date: Dec 2009
Contributions: 6
 
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2913
Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

http://www.realfarmacy.com/walnuts-are-drugs-says-fda/


Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

Nov 16
by MICHAEL TENNANT

Seen any walnuts in your medicine cabinet lately? According to the Food and Drug Administration, that is precisely where you should find them. Because Diamond Foods made truthful claims about the health benefits of consuming walnuts that the FDA didn’t approve, it sent the company a letter declaring, “Your walnut products are drugs” — and “new drugs” at that — and, therefore, “they may not legally be marketed … in the United States without an approved new drug application.” The agency even threatened Diamond with “seizure” if it failed to comply.

Diamond’s transgression was to make “financial investments to educate the public and supply them with walnuts,” as William Faloon of Life Extension magazine put it. On its website and packaging, the company stated that the omega-3 fatty acids found in walnuts have been shown to have certain health benefits, including reduced risk of heart disease and some types of cancer. These claims, Faloon notes, are well supported by scientific research: “Life Extension has published 57 articles that describe the health benefits of walnuts”; and “The US National Library of Medicine database contains no fewer than 35 peer-reviewed published papers supporting a claim that ingesting walnuts improves vascular health and may reduce heart attack risk.”



This evidence was apparently not good enough for the FDA, which told Diamond that its walnuts were “misbranded” because the “product bears health claims that are not authorized by the FDA.”



The FDA’s letter continues: “We have determined that your walnut products are promoted for conditions that cause them to be drugs because these products are intended for use in the prevention, mitigation, and treatment of disease.” Furthermore, the products are also “misbranded” because they “are offered for conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners; therefore, adequate directions for use cannot be written so that a layperson can use these drugs safely for their intended purposes.” Who knew you had to have directions to eat walnuts?



“The FDA’s language,” Faloon writes, “resembles that of an out-of-control police state where tyranny [reigns] over rationality.” He adds:



This kind of bureaucratic tyranny sends a strong signal to the food industry not to innovate in a way that informs the public about foods that protect against disease. While consumers increasingly reach for healthier dietary choices, the federal government wants to deny food companies the ability to convey findings from scientific studies about their products.



Walnuts aren’t the only food whose health benefits the FDA has tried to suppress. Producers of pomegranate juice and green tea, among others, have felt the bureaucrats’ wrath whenever they have suggested that their products are good for people.



Meanwhile, Faloon points out, foods that have little to no redeeming value are advertised endlessly, often with dubious health claims attached. For example, Frito-Lay is permitted to make all kinds of claims about its fat-laden, fried products, including that Lay’s potato chips are “heart healthy.” Faloon concludes that “the FDA obviously does not want the public to discover that they can reduce their risk of age-related disease by consuming healthy foods. They prefer consumers only learn about mass-marketed garbage foods that shorten life span by increasing degenerative disease risk.”



Faloon thinks he knows why this is the case. First, by stifling competition from makers of more healthful alternatives, junk food manufacturers, who he says “heavily lobb[y]” the federal government for favorable treatment, will rake in ever greater profits. Second, by making it less likely that Americans will consume healthful foods, big pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers stand to gain by selling more “expensive cardiac drugs, stents, and coronary bypass procedures” to those made ill by their diets.

But people are starting to fight back against the FDA’s tactics. “The makers of pomegranate juice, for example, have sued the FTC for censoring their First Amendment right to communicate scientific information to the public,” Faloon reports. Congress is also getting into the act with a bill, the Free Speech About Science Act (H.R. 1364), that, Faloon writes, “protects basic free speech rights, ends censorship of science, and enables the natural health products community to share peer-reviewed scientific findings with the public.”



Of course, if the Constitution were being followed as intended, none of this would be necessary. The FDA would not exist; but if it did, as a creation of Congress it would have no power to censor any speech whatsoever. If companies are making false claims about their products, the market will quickly punish them for it, and genuine fraud can be handled through the courts. In the absence of a government agency supposedly guaranteeing the safety of their food and drugs and the truthfulness of producers’ claims, consumers would become more discerning, as indeed they already are becoming despite the FDA’s attempts to prevent the dissemination of scientific research. Besides, as Faloon observed, “If anyone still thinks that federal agencies like the FDA protect the public, this proclamation that healthy foods are illegal drugs exposes the government’s sordid charade.”

Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Megamel29 For This Useful Post:
Azimuth, BBKF, Eaton, EPIC_FAIL, K9Grip, Kelseecat65, luciddrmr, Oswald2001, Pyramid_Head, Tiffany32
  #2  
Old 11-22-2013, 09:14 AM
Shakey's Avatar
Shakey
Offline:
★ Server Supporter ★
Poster Rank:18
MAN
Join Date: Nov 2009
 
Mentioned: 448 Post(s)
Quoted: 21495 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
17/20 14/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss37796
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

I like to put those drugs in my salad.

Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Shakey For This Useful Post:
Megamel29, Oswald2001, sklarian
  #3  
Old 11-22-2013, 09:41 AM
Kelseecat65's Avatar
Kelseecat65
Offline:
The Eternal Optimist
Poster Rank:26
Join Date: Mar 2013
Contributions: 29
 
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Quoted: 11715 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 8/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss27615
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

Nom nom!!

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kelseecat65 For This Useful Post:
Megamel29
  #4  
Old 11-22-2013, 03:02 PM
Kanda444's Avatar
Kanda444
Online
You holdin....?
Poster Rank:11
Join Date: May 2010
Contributions: 23
 
Mentioned: 228 Post(s)
Quoted: 20135 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
15/20 13/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss49377
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

why cant they just put 'these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA' ?

this is more about stopping the food industry from making bold claims like 'our food will help you fight heart disease and cancer' as marketing tools. the FDA is basically saying that if you want to sell food, good.... sell it as food. if you want to sell something that will help fight a disease, that's a drug and needs to be marketed as a drug. cheerios got in trouble for the same shit with their 'heart healthy' marketing... not because it wasnt try but because all grains are 'heart healthy' and nothing about cheerios makes it any better.

nothing wrong with truth in labeling laws... in fact, this kind of shit should be happening to protect the consumer for bullshit claims used as marketing tools.

just my thoughts.

__________________
"High moral character is not a precondition for great moral accomplishments."
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kanda444 For This Useful Post:
bigjoe, Megamel29
  #5  
Old 11-22-2013, 10:59 PM
Megamel29's Avatar
Megamel29
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:283
Female
Join Date: Dec 2009
Contributions: 6
 
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Quoted: 691 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2913
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kanda444 View Post
why cant they just put 'these statements have not been evaluated by the FDA' ?

this is more about stopping the food industry from making bold claims like 'our food will help you fight heart disease and cancer' as marketing tools. the FDA is basically saying that if you want to sell food, good.... sell it as food. if you want to sell something that will help fight a disease, that's a drug and needs to be marketed as a drug. cheerios got in trouble for the same shit with their 'heart healthy' marketing... not because it wasnt try but because all grains are 'heart healthy' and nothing about cheerios makes it any better.

nothing wrong with truth in labeling laws... in fact, this kind of shit should be happening to protect the consumer for bullshit claims used as marketing tools.

just my thoughts.
True. But it's a little odd to think of all the pharmaceuticals with dangerous side effects that they do approve when vitamins have to have that 'not approved by the FDA' label.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Megamel29 For This Useful Post:
Kanda444
  #6  
Old 11-22-2013, 11:07 PM
Kanda444's Avatar
Kanda444
Online
You holdin....?
Poster Rank:11
Join Date: May 2010
Contributions: 23
 
Mentioned: 228 Post(s)
Quoted: 20135 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
15/20 13/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss49377
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megamel29 View Post
True. But it's a little odd to think of all the pharmaceuticals with dangerous side effects that they do approve when vitamins have to have that 'not approved by the FDA' label.
i agree...and this is one of the few times i have ever been on the FDA's side it kills me that while they do this to walnuts, they allow kids to be given heavy mood altering drugs. it seems they care more about the consumer wasting money than about their actual health

__________________
"High moral character is not a precondition for great moral accomplishments."
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Kanda444 For This Useful Post:
Megamel29
  #7  
Old 11-23-2013, 03:43 AM
bob351's Avatar
bob351
Offline:
★ Server Supporter ★
Poster Rank:32
male
Join Date: Jun 2012
 
Mentioned: 158 Post(s)
Quoted: 11212 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 9/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss23599
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

pizza is a fruit... not surprised.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bob351 For This Useful Post:
rapeWhistle
  #8  
Old 11-23-2013, 12:26 PM
Pyramid_Head's Avatar
Pyramid_Head
Offline:
My Rank: MAJOR
Poster Rank:80
Male
Join Date: Aug 2009
 
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Quoted: 1095 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
2/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss12566
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

That is a seriously yummy drug.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Pyramid_Head For This Useful Post:
Megamel29
  #9  
Old 11-23-2013, 06:03 PM
Kanda444's Avatar
Kanda444
Online
You holdin....?
Poster Rank:11
Join Date: May 2010
Contributions: 23
 
Mentioned: 228 Post(s)
Quoted: 20135 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
15/20 13/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss49377
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyramid_Head View Post
That is a seriously yummy drug.
most drugs are seriously yummy

__________________
"High moral character is not a precondition for great moral accomplishments."
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Kanda444 For This Useful Post:
invertigo, Megamel29, Pyramid_Head
  #10  
Old 11-23-2013, 07:48 PM
rapeWhistle's Avatar
rapeWhistle
Offline:
Hand of the King
Poster Rank:15
Standing by...
Join Date: Sep 2010
Contributions: 53
 
Mentioned: 480 Post(s)
Quoted: 21618 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
17/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss40871
Re: Walnuts Are Drugs, Says FDA

Another example of an unchecked government agency using it's power in an insane manner.

__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by joak View Post
but they get all fucking fat and useless.
i'm not sure i'd have the patience to deal with an aging pig.
Reply With Quote

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO