Go Back  

Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m) 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
  #1  
Old 08-25-2012, 02:11 PM
Faline's Avatar
Faline
Offline:
♥ Moderator ♥
Poster Rank:2
Gore Goddess
Join Date: Jun 2009
Contributions: 226
 
Mentioned: 85 Post(s)
Quoted: 1894 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss93392
Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m)

Quote:
A US court has ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m) in damages for infringing intellectual property.

The jury decided several Samsung devices had infringed iPhone-maker Apple's software and design patents, but rejected counter-claims by Samsung.

Apple will now seek import bans on several of its rival's products. Samsung has said it will appeal.

Correspondents say the ruling is one of the most significant in a global battle over patents and intellectual property.

In recent weeks, a court in South Korea ruled that both technology firms had copied each other, while a British court threw out claims by the US company that Samsung had infringed its copyright.

But the year-long US case has involved some of the biggest damages claims, and is likely to shape the way patent licences are handled in the future.

Samsung promised to appeal against the decision describing it as "a loss for the American consumer".

"It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices," the South Korean firm said.

The statement added that it was "unfortunate that patent law can be manipulated to give one company a monopoly over rectangles with rounded corners".

Apple, however, said it applauded the court "for finding Samsung's behaviour wilful and for sending a loud and clear message that stealing isn't right".

Apple said it intended to seek sales injunctions at a follow-up hearing on 20 September

The two firms account for more than half of global smartphone and tablet computer sales.

The nine-person jury at the federal court in San Jose, California had to consider 700 questions about each side's claim that its rival had infringed its intellectual property.

It deliberated for less than three days before coming to a unanimous decision, rejecting all of Samsung's claims and upholding five of Apple's allegations, including:

Some of Samsung's handsets, including its Galaxy S 4G model, infringed Apple's design patents for the look of its iPhone including the system it uses to display text and icons
All the disputed Samsung devices had copied Apple's "bounce-back response", which makes lists jump back as if yanked by a rubber band
Several Samsung devices incorporated Apple's facility allowing users to zoom into text with a tap of a finger
Apple had wanted $2.5bn in damages. Samsung had sought $519m.

Michael Gartenburg, research director at Gartner, told the BBC it could be a good thing for consumers in the long run because it would force Apple's competitors to innovate.

"Anyone who was even thinking about borrowing a technology or design from Apple will think twice about it now," he said.

Other analysts point out that Apple could be the overall loser because the court case has helped boost Samsung's profile.

However, Christopher Marlett of investment bank MDB Capital Group said there was a "social cost" for Samsung.

"As a company, you don't want to be known as someone who steals from someone else," he said.

Apple remains one of the South Korean company's biggest customers buying computer chips and, reportedly, screens.

Sansung has already brought out a new generation of products that should avoid the patent issues.

But Apple said it still intended to seek sales injunctions at a follow-up hearing on 20 September.

It may also seek to use this ruling to block other devices powered by Google's Android software that it believes replicate elements of its user-interface, including current models by Samsung as well as other firms.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-25-2012, 03:03 PM
isharp88's Avatar
isharp88
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2024
Male
Join Date: Jul 2012
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 9/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss145
Re: Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m)

i fucking hate apple products. it drives me crazy being out in public and seeing all the zombies on theyre i phones. im just the type of person where if a majority is doing one thing im doing the opposite. your wearing snap backs im wearing fitted. your wearing fitted im wearing snap back!

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to isharp88 For This Useful Post:
chris50stang, Sharon
  #3  
Old 08-25-2012, 03:49 PM
Sharon's Avatar
Sharon
Offline:
✝ Moderator ✝
Poster Rank:10
Sparkle and Smut
Join Date: Nov 2008
Contributions: 204
 
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Quoted: 1782 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
6/20 16/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss51381
Re: Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m)

Quote:
Other analysts point out that Apple could be the overall loser because the court case has helped boost Samsung's profile.
That's hilareous Go on Samsung! Apple annoys me anyway.

__________________
Why not join us at:
http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/register.php
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Sharon For This Useful Post:
chris50stang
  #4  
Old 08-25-2012, 06:55 PM
Nite's Avatar
Nite
Offline:
Retarded Genius
Poster Rank:3
Join Date: Dec 2009
 
Mentioned: 384 Post(s)
Quoted: 16139 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
11/20 14/20
Today Posts
5/11 ssss88622
Re: Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m)

wait,what?
it will boost samsungs profile?
they are the largest manufacturer of Televisions and Smartphones on the planet,why do they need their profile boosted?
fuck them so now just because Apple are wildly successful it is ok to do this?

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-25-2012, 07:28 PM
abacus's Avatar
abacus
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:1589
Male
Join Date: Apr 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss210
Re: Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m)

Apple steal all their idea's and hardly even manufacture their own shit. Just get other companies to do it and slap their logo in it. Fuck apple and its moron userbase. Their marketing strategy is "if its expensive people will think its better".

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to abacus For This Useful Post:
dean mclean
  #6  
Old 08-26-2012, 09:48 AM
kellyhound's Avatar
kellyhound
Offline:
✝Moderator from Hell✝
Poster Rank:9
e-mail
Join Date: Oct 2006
Contributions: 413
 
Mentioned: 82 Post(s)
Quoted: 1760 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
15/20 20/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss61220
Re: Samsung Ordered To Pay Apple $1.05bn (£665m)

so it all depends on in what country the court is based than. no surprise. i bet both copied one thing from another.

__________________
Reply With Quote

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO