Go Back  

Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
Old 02-27-2012, 11:58 AM
Illusion's Avatar
★ɳѳʀtɦɛʀɳ upʀiรiɳg★
Poster Rank:28
Join Date: Oct 2009
Contributions: 21
Mentioned: 188 Post(s)
Quoted: 10514 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
14/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25213
Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

Jonathon Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, reports on a disturbing case in which a state judge in Pennsylvania threw out an assault case involving a Muslim attacking an atheist for insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

Judge Mark Martin, an Iraq war veteran and a convert to Islam, threw the case out in what appears to be an invocation of Sharia law.

The incident occurred at the Mechanicsburg, Pa., Halloween parade where Ernie Perce, an atheist activist, marched as a zombie Muhammad. Talaag Elbayomy, a Muslim, attacked Perce, and he was arrested by police.

Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that Elbayomy was obligated to attack Perce because of his culture and religion. Judge Martin stated that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not permit people to provoke other people. He also called Perce, the plaintiff in the case, a “doofus.” In effect, Perce was the perpetrator of the assault, in Judge Martin’s view, and Elbayomy the innocent. The Sharia law that the Muslim attacker followed trumped the First Amendment. Words almost fail.

The Washington Post recently reported on an appeals court decision to maintain an injunction to stop the implementation of an amendment to the Oklahoma state constitution that bans the use of Sharia law in state courts. The excuse the court gave was that there was no documented case of Sharia law being invoked in an American court. Judge Martin would seem to have provided that example, which should provide fodder for the argument as the case goes through the federal courts.

The text of the First Amendment could not be clearer. “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof-” It does not say “unless somebody, especially a Muslim, is angered.” Indeed Judge Martin specifically decided to respect the establishment of a religion, in this case Islam.

That Judge Martin should be removed from the bench and severely sanctioned goes almost without saying. He clearly had no business hearing the case in the first place, since he seems to carry an emotional bias. He also needs to retake a constitutional law course. Otherwise, a real can of worms has been opened up, permitting violence against people exercising free speech.

It should be noted that another atheist, dressed as a Zombie Pope, was marching beside the Zombie Muhammad. No outraged Catholics attacked him.


Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Illusion For This Useful Post:
Sharon, Zambini
Old 02-27-2012, 12:07 PM
TwistedPrincess's Avatar
Poster Rank:578
Join Date: Oct 2010
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 12/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1008
Re: Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

well there ya go.... proof that we don't discriminate in america. even a mentally challenged idiot can hold the position of a judge.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TwistedPrincess For This Useful Post:
Old 02-27-2012, 02:50 PM
kellyhound's Avatar
✝Moderator from Hell✝
Poster Rank:9
Join Date: Oct 2006
Contributions: 398
Mentioned: 81 Post(s)
Quoted: 1728 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
16/20 20/20
Today Posts
4/11 ssss60916
Re: Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

what an idiot.
audio starts around 1.40.
<****** width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Bf11F3y9LOE?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></******>

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kellyhound For This Useful Post:
Illusion, Sharon
Old 02-27-2012, 03:59 PM
TheCapn's Avatar
Poster Rank:853
Join Date: Nov 2009
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss545
Re: Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

I have mixed feelings. On the one hand thats a corrupt judge, but most judges are corrupt. However "dressed as a zombie mohammad".

Now..it seem that he was just trying to stir up problems, that is provoking an assault.

Either way "Fuck religion, stupid people and Bill O Reilly"

Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2012, 05:21 PM
Sharon's Avatar
✝ Moderator ✝
Poster Rank:10
Sparkle and Smut
Join Date: Nov 2008
Contributions: 203
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Quoted: 1765 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 16/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss51204
Re: Penn Judge: Muslims Allowed to Attack People for Insulting Mohammad

The amount of time Jesus'/God's name is used in vain in the media...

Imagine what would happen if Mohammed was blasphemed against A war!!

Why not join us at:
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sharon For This Useful Post:
rrrr_reubs, Zambini

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO