Go Back  

Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
  #1  
Old 03-22-2012, 12:11 PM
bigmikeymike's Avatar
bigmikeymike
Offline:
To infinity and beyond!
Poster Rank:538
Weener
Join Date: Mar 2011
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 12/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1140
Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress

Let the president be duly warned.

Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr., R-N.C., has introduced a resolution declaring that should the president use offensive military force without authorization of an act of Congress, “it is the sense of Congress” that such an act would be “an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor.”

Specifically, Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution reserves for Congress alone the power to declare war, a restriction that has been sorely tested in recent years, including Obama’s authorization of military force in Libya.

In an exclusive WND column, former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo claims that Jones introduced his House Concurrent Resolution 107 in response to startling recent comments from Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta.

“This week it was Secretary of Defense Panetta’s declaration before the Senate Armed Services Committee that he and President Obama look not to the Congress for authorization to bomb Syria but to NATO and the United Nations,” Tancredo writes. “This led to Rep. Walter Jones, R-N.C., introducing an official resolution calling for impeachment should Obama take offensive action based on Panetta’s policy statement, because it would violate the Constitution.”

Read “The Case for Impeachment” and know why Obama has got to go before America is done for …

In response to questions from Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., over who determines the proper and legal use of the U.S. military, Panetta said, “Our goal would be to seek international permission and we would … come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress – I think those are issues we would have to discuss as we decide what to do here.”

“Well, I’m almost breathless about that,” Sessions responded, “because what I heard you say is, ‘We’re going to seek international approval, and then we’ll come and tell the Congress what we might do, and we might seek congressional approval.’ And I just want to say to you that’s a big [deal].”

Asked again what was the legal basis for U.S. military force, Panetta suggested a NATO coalition or U.N. resolution.

Sessions was dumbfounded by the answer.

“Well, I’m all for having international support, but I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “They can provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”

The exchange itself can be seen below:

<****** width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/5zNwOeyuG84?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></******>

The full wording of H. Con. Res. 107, which is currently referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, is as follows:

Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a president without prior and clear authorization of an act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under Article I, Section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution.


http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/obama-imp...w-in-congress/

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bigmikeymike For This Useful Post:
Dynamo47
  #2  
Old 03-22-2012, 12:19 PM
Flaka
Offline:
Tuya
Poster Rank:19
Join Date: Oct 2009
 
Mentioned: 35 Post(s)
Quoted: 2170 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
4/20 14/20
Today Posts
1/11 ssss37570
Oh please. Impeach the black guy right? Why didn't they impeach bush when he fucked us all?

Oh yeah cuz he's white.

Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flaka For This Useful Post:
clndstn46, Nite, rob666, TwistedPrincess
  #3  
Old 03-22-2012, 12:40 PM
bigmikeymike's Avatar
bigmikeymike
Offline:
To infinity and beyond!
Poster Rank:538
Weener
Join Date: Mar 2011
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 12/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1140
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress

lol yeah because he's black. Not because he fucked this country.

And yes Bush should have been impeached but his time is passed.


Bush didn't forge a birth certificate or SSN to get into office.

So it's not just because he's black but I'm sure it adds fuel to the fire. But no doubt this is what people will make it about. Not all the criminal activity this freak has done.


Shit, if I could do half the stuff he has and get away with it I'd be soooooo happy <- reference any one? Le petit tourette?

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-22-2012, 01:40 PM
Dynamo47's Avatar
Dynamo47
Offline:
My Rank: MASTER SERGEANT
Poster Rank:379
Male
Join Date: Jan 2012
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 10/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1905
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress

I do not like Obama. I did not vote for Obama. But I think that is a little extreme. I am a Republican Committeeman in my state and I would never support something like that.

With a winnable presidential election coming up something like this would piss off more voters then win them.

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Dynamo47 For This Useful Post:
candymosh, rob666
  #5  
Old 03-22-2012, 03:09 PM
TwistedPrincess's Avatar
TwistedPrincess
Offline:
My Rank: STAFF SERGEANT
Poster Rank:583
Join Date: Oct 2010
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 12/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1008
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress

bush left the toilet full of shit and obama gets the blame for not flushing it i guess. obama did lie during his campagne about getting our troops home within 6 months but i think every campagne is full of lies. IMO, obama is just a puppet for those who are in real control, the elite, the Bilderberg Group, whoever. someone pulls his strings. this is why some of those such as kucinich were conveniently forced out of the elections. they were not puppets willing to have their strings pulled.

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TwistedPrincess For This Useful Post:
bigmikeymike, rob666
  #6  
Old 03-22-2012, 11:38 PM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Join Date: May 2009
 
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Quoted: 8621 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16567
Re: Obama Impeachment Bill Now in Congress

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigmikeymike View Post
lol yeah because he's black. Not because he fucked this country.

And yes Bush should have been impeached but his time is passed.


Bush didn't forge a birth certificate or SSN to get into office.

So it's not just because he's black but I'm sure it adds fuel to the fire. But no doubt this is what people will make it about. Not all the criminal activity this freak has done.


Shit, if I could do half the stuff he has and get away with it I'd be soooooo happy <- reference any one? Le petit tourette?
Let the fucking Birther movement die already, holy fucking fuck........ At this point its just an intelligence test, and if you STILL believe Obama's birth certificate is fake you have failed.

Reply With Quote

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO