Go Back  

N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
 
  #21  
Old 04-25-2012, 10:36 AM
Bletch's Avatar
Bletch
Offline:
My Rank: MASTER GUNNERY SERGEANT
Poster Rank:256
Male
Join Date: Feb 2010
 
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Quoted: 687 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss3324
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Someone should nuke North Korea from orbit, just to make sure.

Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:39 PM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Join Date: May 2009
 
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Quoted: 8621 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16567
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Quote:
Originally Posted by niknik View Post
You are hilarious, South Korea has a very advanced military. You think they don't know much much more about the norths military and locations than vise versa. You can bet the south already has it missiles pointed at strategic sites in hundreds of locations. That can be fired simultaneously at a moments notice.
The North has tunnels dug under the DMZ, and tens of thousands of artillery pieces that can hit Seoul...... And Nukes.
There is a reason that North Korea has not been invaded, it would be the death of hundreds of thousands..... If South korea's military is so advanced, why do they still need 30k of our troops on their border with NK?

Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:45 PM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Join Date: May 2009
 
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Quoted: 8621 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16567
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dynamo47 View Post
Which is precisely why swift and devastating action needs to be taken. But a million man army on what is essentially an island is no match for the combined technology and arsenal the US and our allies could throw at them IF they want to do it properly.

We don't need another politically correct Iraqi war. We need to just lay them out and put them down for the count.
I agree its not a question of IF they could be beaten, but at what cost........ We're already in 2 wars, neither of which went as planned, and North Korea probably will use their nukes when faced with certain defeat.
Not defending their actions or policy's at all, I just don't think we should be involved and paying for another nation building experiment.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to rob666 For This Useful Post:
dankboosh
  #24  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:50 PM
niknik's Avatar
niknik
Offline:
My Rank: MAJOR
Poster Rank:68
Conservative OG
Join Date: Jan 2010
 
Mentioned: 249 Post(s)
Quoted: 6768 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss13671
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Because we have no peace treaty robb. Technically we are still at war with north korea.

Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:56 PM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Join Date: May 2009
 
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Quoted: 8621 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16567
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Quote:
Originally Posted by niknik View Post
Because we have no peace treaty robb. Technically we are still at war with north korea.
Technically the North would have rolled over them 50 years ago if not for the UN, and that probably still holds true today.......... Its just a longer, more drawn out version of Nam.

Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:07 PM
niknik's Avatar
niknik
Offline:
My Rank: MAJOR
Poster Rank:68
Conservative OG
Join Date: Jan 2010
 
Mentioned: 249 Post(s)
Quoted: 6768 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss13671
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Sure the south would sustain big blows. But really, the north is far more out gunned. The south buys it's weapons from America, we train their soldiers, have war games with them. The south has been preparing for fifty years, they are as ready as they will ever be. All wars are brutal and bloody, so no doubt the south with sustain large casualties. But in a situation like that, it's the ending that matters most. Just as in ww2, England got rocked by Germany, but look who won. Now tell me does it matter now that Germany did so much damage?

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:16 PM
niknik's Avatar
niknik
Offline:
My Rank: MAJOR
Poster Rank:68
Conservative OG
Join Date: Jan 2010
 
Mentioned: 249 Post(s)
Quoted: 6768 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss13671
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob666 View Post
Technically the North would have rolled over them 50 years ago if not for the UN, and that probably still holds true today.......... Its just a longer, more drawn out version of Nam.
I'm sure soon we will find out.

Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-25-2012, 06:37 PM
Tyberius
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:745
Join Date: Dec 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 11 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss694
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Quote:
Originally Posted by rob666 View Post
why do they still need 30k of our troops on their border with NK?
Cause if you put 30k angry south Koreans on the border chances that an incident will break out increase substantially.
If you put 30K U.S. soldiers then you know the border is secured and that NK army won't do anything stupid.

It's a precaution measure, not a demonstration of power.
Regardless of the previous U.S.-NK conflict, it's still a better solution that letting SK secure the border and watch them go into open war within weeks.

Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tyberius For This Useful Post:
candymosh, niknik
  #29  
Old 04-25-2012, 09:46 PM
rob666's Avatar
rob666
Offline:
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:55
Join Date: May 2009
 
Mentioned: 59 Post(s)
Quoted: 8621 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss16567
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Quote:
Originally Posted by niknik View Post
Sure the south would sustain big blows. But really, the north is far more out gunned. The south buys it's weapons from America, we train their soldiers, have war games with them. The south has been preparing for fifty years, they are as ready as they will ever be. All wars are brutal and bloody, so no doubt the south with sustain large casualties. But in a situation like that, it's the ending that matters most. Just as in ww2, England got rocked by Germany, but look who won. Now tell me does it matter now that Germany did so much damage?
If Hitler would of had nuclear technology, you can bet the UK would not still exist.... The stakes are a whole lot higher, this is a whole different ballgame..... Its not a matter of winning a conventional war against a sane enemy, NK is not rational and they will use everything at their disposal..... This is the problem.

Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-25-2012, 09:50 PM
Blewvane's Avatar
Blewvane
Offline:
Benevolent dictator
Poster Rank:28
Arse fucker
Join Date: May 2009
 
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Quoted: 1399 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 15/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss25730
Re: N. Korea Threatens Attack on S. Korea

Take a step back for a moment and ask yourselves who really cares? Korea as a whole is one of the most racist nations on earth, their society refuses to accept non Koreans or half blood Koreans. The south is quick to accept aid where ever it can get it but refuses to take any real action that would see an end to the north/south split. "North Korea is our brother"??? Well your brother wants to arse fuck you and take control of your country so they can hand it over to China, how about that!
South Korea has the worlds most powerful military machine standing behind it saying 'just attack the motherfuckers, we will back you up'. If the south isn't willing to launch a pre emptive strike to sort this shit out once and for all then why should we continue to get stuck with the task of protecting them.

Reply With Quote

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO