Go Back  

Genetically Engineering 'ethical' Babies is a Moral Obligation 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
Old 08-17-2012, 03:49 PM
knuggy's Avatar
Poster Rank:424
Join Date: Feb 2011
Contributions: 1
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 31 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 12/20
Today Posts
3/11 sssss1616
Genetically Engineering 'ethical' Babies is a Moral Obligation

Genetically screening our offspring to make them better people is just 'responsible parenting', claims an eminent Oxford academic.

Professor Julian Savulescu said that creating so-called designer babies could be considered a "moral obligation" as it makes them grow up into "ethically better children".
The expert in practical ethics said that we should actively give parents the choice to screen out personality flaws in their children as it meant they were then less likely to "harm themselves and others".
The academic, who is also editor-in-chief of the Journal of Medical Ethics, made his comments in an article in the latest edition of Reader's Digest.
He explained that we are now in the middle of a genetic revolution and that although screening, for all but a few conditions, remained illegal it should be welcomed.He said that science is increasingly discovering that genes have a significant influence on personality – with certain genetic markers in embryo suggesting future characteristics.
By screening in and screening out certain genes in the embryos, it should be possible to influence how a child turns out.
In the end, he said that "rational design" would help lead to a better, more intelligent and less violent society in the future.
"Surely trying to ensure that your children have the best, or a good enough, opportunity for a great life is responsible parenting?" wrote Prof Savulescu, the Uehiro Professor in practical ethics.
"So where genetic selection aims to bring out a trait that clearly benefits an individual and society, we should allow parents the choice.
"To do otherwise is to consign those who come after us to the ball and chain of our squeamishness and irrationality.
"Indeed, when it comes to screening out personality flaws, such as potential alcoholism, psychopathy and disposition to violence, you could argue that people have a moral obligation to select ethically better children.
"They are, after all, less likely to harm themselves and others."
"If we have the power to intervene in the nature of our offspring — rather than consigning them to the natural lottery — then we should."He said that we already routinely screen embryos and foetuses for conditions such as cystic fibrosis and Down’s syndrome and couples can test embryos for inherited bowel and breast cancer genes.
Rational design is just a natural extension of this, he said.
He said that unlike the eugenics movements, which fell out of favour when it was adopted by the Nazis, the system would be voluntary and allow parents to choose the characteristics of their children.
"We’re routinely screening embryos and foetuses for conditions such as cystic fibrosis and Down’s syndrome, and there’s little public outcry," he said.
"What’s more, few people protested at the decisions in the mid- 2000s to allow couples to test embryos for inherited bowel and breast cancer genes, and this pushes us a lot close to creating designer humans."
"Whether we like it or not, the future of humanity is in our hands now. Rather than fearing genetics, we should embrace it. We can do better than chance."

Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2012, 10:11 PM
dean mclean's Avatar
dean mclean
Poster Rank:347
Join Date: Apr 2012
Contributions: 1
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 22 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 9/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2115
Re: Genetically Engineering 'ethical' Babies is a Moral Obligation

I really wish academia would stop being such a fucking joke. Personality is NOT strictly correlated to genetics and its fucking ridiculous to suggest this would have any real effect. If he wants to promote "responsible parenting" he should be suggesting parents instill their kids with solid thinking skills and values, not with the idea that they would have been doomed to a life if crime if they were born with a specific personality.
And CF and Down's are physical diseases with a specific and predictable outcome, not personality types that only very loosely linked to some arbitrary norm of "acceptable behavior". There's a huge fucking difference: a person makes a choice to commit a crime. A person does not make a choice to suffer from a genetic disease.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dean mclean For This Useful Post:
Old 08-29-2012, 05:32 AM
curvature's Avatar
Poster Rank:497
Join Date: Aug 2010
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 177 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss1274
Re: Genetically Engineering 'ethical' Babies is a Moral Obligation

$20 bucks says he doesnt have any kids.

Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2012, 12:08 PM
lagunasun's Avatar
Poster Rank:1028
Join Date: Jan 2010
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss405
Re: Genetically Engineering 'ethical' Babies is a Moral Obligation

who will know until the first round grows up, and becomes "experiments" using the scientific method? Then who's to say, they wouldn't be a fluke?

Reply With Quote

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO